Bioelectrical stimulation therapy for muscle injuries in aerobics athletes

  • Jian Chen Department of Physical Education, College of Engineering and technology, Chengdu University of Technology, Leshan 614000, China
Keywords: bioelectrical stimulation therapy; muscle injury; functional recovery; pain score; recurrence rate
Ariticle ID: 268

Abstract

This article aims to explore the recovery effect of the bioelectrical stimulation therapy on muscle injuries in aerobics athletes. Non-invasive medical techniques are adopted to activate muscle tissue through electrical currents, promoting muscle contraction ability and functional recovery. This article selects 100 aerobics athletes with muscle injuries through questionnaire surveys and interviews. The Modulo Plus electrical stimulation device is used, and personalized treatment plans are set. Muscle changes before and after treatment are monitored using electromyography and ultrasound technology. In the single-blind experiment, in the fourth week, the pain score of the experimental group decreases to 2.4 points; the functional recovery score increases to 75.2 points; the flexibility measurement reaches 19.2 cm. In the case-control study, the bioelectrical stimulation therapy cures all athletes in the sixth week, exceeding the conventional therapy’s 35 patients, and has a lower recurrence rate. In the cohort study, athletes who use the bioelectrical stimulation therapy for a long time have a shorter average recovery time of 15.3 days and a recurrence rate of 16%. In the muscle recovery experiment, in the eighth week after treatment, the electromyographic activity level of the experimental group increases to 58.6 μV; the muscle thickness increases to 4.3 mm; the echo intensity increases to 63.1 dB; the fatigue characteristic score drops to 2.1. These data indicate that the bioelectrical stimulation therapy has significant effects in reducing pain, promoting functional recovery, improving flexibility, shortening recovery time, and reducing recurrence rates and pain scores, thereby providing an effective treatment option for the recovery of muscle injuries in aerobics athletes.

References

1. Nescolarde L, Talluri A, Yanguas J, et al. Phase angle in localized bioimpedance measurements to assess and monitor muscle injury. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders. 2023; 24(3): 415–428. doi: 10.1007/s11154-023-09790-9

2. Russell CS, Mostafavi A, Quint JP, et al. In Situ Printing of Adhesive Hydrogel Scaffolds for the Treatment of Skeletal Muscle Injuries. ACS Applied Bio Materials. 2020; 3(3): 1568–1579. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.9b01176

3. Bordalo M, Arnaiz J, Yamashiro E, et al. Imaging of Muscle Injuries. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America. 2023; 31(2): 163–179. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2023.01.002

4. Boivin J, Tolsma R, Awad P, et al. The Biological Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Skeletal Muscle Injury and Repair. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021; 51(5): 1347–1355. doi: 10.1177/03635465211061606

5. Farrell SG, Hatem M, Bharam S. Acute Adductor Muscle Injury: A Systematic Review on Diagnostic Imaging, Treatment, and Prevention. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023; 51(13): 3591–3603. doi: 10.1177/03635465221140923

6. Contreras-Muñoz P, Torrella JR, Venegas V, et al. Muscle Precursor Cells Enhance Functional Muscle Recovery and Show Synergistic Effects With Postinjury Treadmill Exercise in a Muscle Injury Model in Rats. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021; 49(4): 1073–1085. doi: 10.1177/0363546521989235

7. Ostrowski P, Bonczar M, Avram AE, et al. Safety monitoring of drug-induced muscle injury and rhabdomyolysis: a biomarker-guided approach for clinical practice and drug trials. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2023; 61(10): 1688–1699. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0313

8. Xu Y, Gu J. Cardiac and Muscle Injury Might Partially Contribute to Elevated Aminotransferases in COVID-19 Patients. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2020; 18(12): 2847–2848. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.042

9. Adidharma W, Khouri AN, Lee JC, et al. Sensory nerve regeneration and reinnervation in muscle following peripheral nerve injury. Muscle & Nerve. 2022; 66(4): 384–396. doi: 10.1002/mus.27661

10. Ekstrand J, Bengtsson H, Waldén M, et al. Hamstring injury rates have increased during recent seasons and now constitute 24% of all injuries in men’s professional football: the UEFA Elite Club Injury Study from 2001/02 to 2021/22. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2022; 57(5): 292–298. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105407

11. Chan SMH, Cerni C, Passey S, et al. Cigarette Smoking Exacerbates Skeletal Muscle Injury without Compromising Its Regenerative Capacity. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 2020; 62(2): 217–230. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2019-0106oc

12. Wang C, Wang P, Qi G. A new use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: Role of bioelectric technology in resistant hypertension (Review). Biomedical Reports. 2023; 18(6). doi: 10.3892/br.2023.1621

13. Steadman CJ, Abd-El Barr MM, Lad SP, et al. Bioelectric Medicine: Electrotherapy and Transcutaneous Electromagnetic Stimulation—Clinical and Research Challenges. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2022; 103(11): 2268–2271. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.08.001

14. Barsi PC, Santamaria MP, Casarin RCV, et al. Can bioelectrical stimulation favor orthodontic treatment? A randomized clinical trial to evaluate tooth movement, patient-centered, and inflammatory biomarker outcomes. AJO-DO Clinical Companion. 2023; 3(6): 464–472. doi: 10.1016/j.xaor.2023.09.004

15. Lee H, Cho S, Kim D, et al. Bioelectric medicine: unveiling the therapeutic potential of micro-current stimulation. Biomedical Engineering Letters. 2024; 14(3): 367–392. doi: 10.1007/s13534-024-00366-3

16. Lee SK, Jeakins GS, Tukiainen A, et al. Next-Generation Bioelectric Medicine: Harnessing the Therapeutic Potential of Neural Implants. Bioelectricity. 2020; 2(4): 321–327. doi: 10.1089/bioe.2020.0044

17. Zulbaran-Rojas A, Park C, El-Refaei N, et al. Home-Based Electrical Stimulation to Accelerate Wound Healing—A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Trial. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 2021; 17(1): 15–24. doi: 10.1177/19322968211035128

18. Zhao S, Mehta AS, Zhao M. Biomedical applications of electrical stimulation. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2020; 77(14): 2681–2699. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03446-1

19. Madane VB, Mali SN. Bioelectric Medicine: Magicall Tools for Treatment of Many Diseases. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. Published online November 26, 2021: 304–308. doi: 10.52711/2231-5713.2021.00052

20. Gao Q, Zhang F, Gao S, Hua S. Study on the therapeutic effect of biomimetic electrical stimulation therapy on postpartum rectus abdominis muscle separation. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(9): 73–76.

21. Xu Y. Effect of biofeedback electrical stimulation therapy combined with pelvic floor muscle training on postpartum pelvic floor electromyography values, tissue status, and functional rehabilitation. Harbin Medical Journal, 2022, 42(2): 135–136.

22. Wu F, Luo J, Long T, Liu L. Clinical efficacy of electrical stimulation biofeedback combined with comprehensive exercise therapy in the treatment of middle-aged and elderly patients with mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence. Journal of Clinical Research, 2021, 38(2): 206–208.

23. Shafshak TS, Elnemr R. The Visual Analogue Scale Versus Numerical Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Severity and Predicting Disability in Low Back Pain. JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology. 2020; 27(7): 282–285. doi: 10.1097/rhu.0000000000001320

24. Modarresi S, Lukacs MJ, Ghodrati M, et al. A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Psychometric Properties of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and the Visual Analog Scale for Use in People with Neck Pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2021; 38(2): 132–148. doi: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000999

25. Keysers C, Gazzola V, Wagenmakers EJ. Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence. Nature Neuroscience. 2020; 23(7): 788–799. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0660-4

26. Astuti RW, Fitria H, Rohana R. The Influence of Leadership Styles and Work Motivation on Teacher’s Performance. Journal of Social Work and Science Education. 2020; 1(2): 105–114. doi: 10.52690/jswse.v1i2.33

27. Siraj N, Bwambok DK, Brady PN, et al. Raman spectroscopy and multivariate regression analysis in biomedical research, medical diagnosis, and clinical analysis. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews. 2021; 56(8-10): 615–672. doi: 10.1080/05704928.2021.1913744

28. Orlandi M, Escudero-Casao M, Licini G. Nucleophilicity Prediction via Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2021; 86(4): 3555–3564. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c02952

29. Watanabe K, Vieira TM, Gallina A, et al. Novel Insights Into Biarticular Muscle Actions Gained From High-Density Electromyogram. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 2021; 49(3): 179–187. doi: 10.1249/jes.0000000000000254

30. Pradhan A, He J, Jiang N. Score, Rank, and Decision-Level Fusion Strategies of Multicode Electromyogram-Based Verification and Identification Biometrics. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 2022; 26(3): 1068–1079. doi: 10.1109/jbhi.2021.3109595

31. Wang Kj, Li Cl. A ℘-order R-L high-pass filter modeled by local fractional derivative. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2020; 59(5): 3255–3259. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.049

32. Wang Y, Chen P, Yong J, et al. A Comprehensive Investigation on the Selection of High-Pass Harmonic Filters. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 2022; 37(5): 4212–4226. doi: 10.1109/tpwrd.2022.3147835

33. Zeng Y, Shi H, Peng J, et al. A review of the scope of placebo effect control for appropriate techniques in traditional Chinese medicine nursing in clinical research. Military Nursing, 2023, 40(11): 79–82.

34. Tu R, Tao Q, Li S, et al. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial of hydrolyzed casein peptide improving sleep quality by regulating gut microbiota. Chinese Journal of Microecology, 2024, 36(6): 682–687.

Published
2024-11-07
How to Cite
Chen, J. (2024). Bioelectrical stimulation therapy for muscle injuries in aerobics athletes. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(2), 268. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb268
Section
Article