Analysis of the mechanical characteristics of progressive one-handed underhand shooting in basketball play through kinematics

  • Huajian Zhu Wuxi Vocational Institute of Commerce, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214031, China
Keywords: kinematics; mechanical characteristic; one-handed underhand shooting; shooting speed
Article ID: 125

Abstract

Background: Progressive one-handed underhand shooting is not only a key movement in basketball but also a primary method of scoring. Objective: This paper aims to compare the mechanical characteristics of players at different levels while performing the progressive one-handed underhand shooting movement to guide training. Methods: Ten athletes were divided into an excellent group and an ordinary group. The shooting was conducted using two SONY cameras, and the kinematics data were acquired through re-analysis in the Simi 3D Motion system for comparative analysis. Results: The average number of successful shots per person in the excellent group was 8.12 ± 0.81, which was significantly different from the ordinary group. During ball holding, the first step length of the excellent group was 1.91 ± 0.03 m, showing a significant difference compared to the ordinary group. At the beginning of ball holding, the right elbow joint angle for the excellent group was 121.26° ± 0.58° and the right hip joint angle was 135.64° ± 0.78°, both significantly different from those in the ordinary group. At the end of holding the ball, the excellent group had a right shoulder joint angle of 51.26° ± 2.36° and a right elbow joint angle of 70.34° ± 1.68°, which was significantly different from the ordinary group. At the end of jump, the excellent group had a right shoulder joint angle of 80.16° ± 2.21° and a right elbow joint angle of 87.45° ± 1.68°, which was significantly different from the ordinary group. During the shooting phase, the excellent group had a shooting angle of 60.12° ± 2.36°, a shooting height of 2.92 ± 0.03 m, and a shooting speed of 4.12 ± 0.46 m/s, all showing significant differences compared to the ordinary group. Conclusion: The excellent group with more sufficient stride, push, and extension and better shooting parameters performed better in performing the movement of progressive one-handed underhand shooting.

References

1. Pomohaci M, Sopa IS. Study Regarding the Development of Jumping Ability in Basketball Game. Land Forces Academy Review. 2021; 26(3): 198–208. doi: 10.2478/raft-2021-0027

2. Yano S, Matsuura K, Tanioka H, et al. Tactics-Trend Analysis for Increasing the Possibility of Shooting in a Basketball Match. In: 2020 14th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM). 2020.

3. Ghiţescu IG, Tudor V, Moanţă AD. Study on the Development of Vertical Jumping Force in U18 Junior Basketball Players. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 117: 55–59. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.178

4. Taylor JB, Nguyen AD, Parry HA, et al. Modifying midsole stiffness of basketball footwear affects foot and ankle biomechanics. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2019; 14(3): 359–367. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20190359

5. Pehar M, Sekulic D, Sisic N, et al. Evaluation of different jumping tests in defining position-specific and performance-level differences in high level basketball players. Biology of Sport. 2017; 3: 263–272. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2017.67122

6. Arora C, Singh P, Varghese V. Biomechanics of core musculature on upper extremity performance in basketball players. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2021; 27: 127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.02.023

7. Zhen L, Wang L, Hao Z. A biomechanical analysis of basketball shooting. International Journal of Simulation—Systems, Science and Technology. 2015; 16(3): 1.1–1.5.

8. Tang D, Ma G, Guo J. Applications of Monte Carlo Algorithm in Research on the Basketball Hit Rate of Ideal Hollow Shooting Based on Matlab Simulation. Information Technology Journal. 2013; 12(15): 3315–3319. doi: 10.3923/itj.2013.3315.3319

9. A Halim NA, Ismail M. Effectiveness of practice in mind program on standing shot and jump shot performance in elite netball players. Malaysian Journal of Sport Scienceand Recreation (MJSSR). 2021; 17(1): 106. doi: 10.24191/mjssr.v17i1.12734

10. Arora C, Singh P, Varghese V. Biomechanics of core musculature on upper extremity performance in basketball players. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2021; 27: 127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.02.023

11. Daub BD, McLean BD, Heishman AD, et al. Impacts of mental fatigue and sport specific film sessions on basketball shooting tasks. European Journal of Sport Science. 2022; 23(8): 1500–1508. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2161421

12. Suzuki R, Maeda M. Relationship between shooting distance and release parameters in basketball. Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences). 2022; 67(0): 591–603. doi: 10.5432/jjpehss.21128

13. Lian C, Ma R, Wang X, et al. ANN-Enhanced IoT Wristband for Recognition of Player Identity and Shot Types Based on Basketball Shooting Motion Analysis. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2022; 22(2): 1404–1413. doi: 10.1109/jsen.2021.3128046

14. Sirnik M, Erčulj F, Rošker J. Research of visual attention in basketball shooting: A systematic review with meta-analysis. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2022; 17(5): 1195–1210. doi: 10.1177/17479541221075740

15. Smajla D, Kozinc Ž, Šarabon N. Elbow Extensors and Volar Flexors Strength Capacity and Its Relation to Shooting Performance in Basketball Players—A Pilot Study. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(22): 8206. doi: 10.3390/app10228206

16. Hanley B, Bissas A, Merlino S. The head is an excellent proxy for the whole body center of mass when measuring running velocity in competition. Journal of Biomechanics. 2021; 121: 110399. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110399

17. Miller DI, Morrison WE. Prediction of segmental parameters using the Hanavan human body model. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1975; 7(3). doi: 10.1249/00005768-197500730-00019

18. Wei J. The adoption of repeated measurement of variance analysis and Shapiro—Wilk test. Frontiers of Medicine. 2022; 16(4): 659–660. doi: 10.1007/s11684-021-0908-8

19. Batmaz, SB, Birinci, et al. Quality of life of children with allergic disease: the effect of depression and anxiety of children and their mothers. Journal of Asthma. 2021; 59(9): 1776–1786. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1978480

20. Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews. 2007; 82(4): 591–605. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00027.x

21. Kim KJ, Gailey R, Agrawal V, et al. Quantification of Agility Testing with Inertial Sensors after a Knee Injury. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2019; 52(1): 244–251. doi: 10.1249/mss.0000000000002090

22. Murakami T, Nakamura T. Athlete 3D pose estimation from a monocular TV sports video using pre-trained temporal convolutional networks. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). doi: 10.1109/smc42975.2020.9283128

23. Santa ED, Scalise L, Martarelli M, et al. Comfort assessment in the use of shotgun for skeet shooting: an EMG based approach. 2020 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC). 2020; 15: 1–6. doi: 10.1109/i2mtc43012.2020.9128689

24. Dou Z. RETRACTED: Research on virtual simulation of basketball technology 3D animation based on FPGA and motion capture system. Microprocessors and Microsystems. 2021; 81: 103679. doi: 10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103679

25. Mueske NM, Abousamra O, Katzel MJ, et al. Effect of Static Alignment on Dynamic Knee Abduction Moments in Adolescent Athletes with Recent ACL Reconstruction. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2021; 53(8): 1555–1560. doi: 10.1249/mss.0000000000002642

26. Dix C, Arundale A, Silvers-Granelli H, et al. Descriptive trunk kinematics in healthy collegiate women’s soccer players indicate trunk center of mass is laterally positioned prior to decelerating and cutting. Journal of ISAKOS. 2022; 7(3): 10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.03.002

27. Kapothanillath AN, Pradeep S, Sathishkumar S, et al. The Role of Boundary Layer Theory in Soccer Ball Dynamics. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2021; 1132(1): 012009. doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1132/1/012009

28. Kim DH, Oh JR, Seo YH. The Effect of Core Exercise on Blood Lactate and Performance Improvement Factors of Badminton Players. The Korean Journal of Growth and Development. 2018; 26(1): 47–51. doi: 10.34284/kjgd.2018.02.26.1.47

29. Cabarkapa D, Fry AC, Cabarkapa DV, et al. Kinetic and Kinematic Characteristics of Proficient and Non-Proficient 2-Point and 3-Point Basketball Shooters. Sports. 2021; 10(1): 2. doi: 10.3390/sports10010002

30. Caseiro A, França C, Faro A, et al. Kinematic analysis of the basketball jump shot with increasing shooting distance: comparison between experienced and non-experienced players. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics. 2023; 25(2). doi: 10.37190/abb-02205-2023-04

31. Slegers N, Lee D, Wong G. The Relationship of Intra-Individual Release Variability with Distance and Shooting Performance in Basketball. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2021: 508–515. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2021.508

Published
2024-10-14
How to Cite
Zhu, H. (2024). Analysis of the mechanical characteristics of progressive one-handed underhand shooting in basketball play through kinematics. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb.v21i1.125
Section
Article