Research on interactive english classroom teaching based on biosensor technology: Analysis of biological indicators

  • Xia Guo School of Western Languages, Mudanjiang Normal University, Mudanjiang 157011, China
Keywords: biosensor; English; classroom teaching; spiking neural networks (SNNs)
Article ID: 935

Abstract

With the advancement of educational technology, biosensors are becoming valuable in enhancing classroom interactivity and adapting teaching strategies. In English language classrooms, maintaining student engagement and managing learning anxiety is essential for effective learning; traditional methods fail to offer real-time insights into student engagement and emotional states. The objective of the research was to enhance language instruction effectiveness by monitoring learners’ cognitive states using biosensor technology. Initially, biosensors were used to collect physiological data such as heart rate variability, eye movement, facial expression, posture, and seating data from students during English language lessons and also gathered over four weeks in a controlled classroom setting. The collected data underwent noise reduction using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to improve signal clarity and min-max normalization to scale the data within a consistent range for accurate analysis. Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are integrated with biosensors and areic brain neural processing, enabling dynamic adaptation of teaching content based on physiological signals and enhancing personalized learning by responding to student’s cognitive and emotional states. The findings offer that biosensor technology combined with SNNs significantly improves student engagement, reduces language anxiety, and increases learning efficiency. When compared to other weeks, student engagement (30%), cognitive load (10%), task completion efficiency (30%), attention focus (35%), and teacher-student interaction (35%), all showed better outcomes in Week 4. This suggests that biosensor-driven adaptive teaching, powered by SNNs, has the potential to transform interactive language learning.

References

1. Shu, D., Huang, C. and Xing, Y., 2024. Analysis of the promotion of classroom atmosphere in multimodal English teaching based on human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(13), pp.3516–3527.

2. KABIGTING, R. and Nanud, J.A., 2020. English language classroom anxiety and performance of senior high school learners. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 1(2), pp.58–69.

3. Junker, R., Donker, M.H. and Mainhard, T., 2021. Potential classroom stressors of teachers: An audiovisual and physiological approach. Learning and Instruction, 75, p.101495.

4. Alshumaimeri, Y.A. and Alhumud, A.M., 2021. EFL Students’ Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Virtual Classrooms in Enhancing Communication Skills. English Language Teaching, 14(11), pp.80–96.

5. Kaur, K. and Lim-Ratnam, C., 2023. Implementation of formative assessment in the English language classroom: Insights from three primary schools in Singapore. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 22(2), pp.215–237.

6. Olsen, R.H. and English, J.G., 2023. Advancements in G protein‐coupled receptor biosensors to study GPCR‐G protein coupling. British journal of pharmacology, 180(11), pp.1433–1443.

7. Yotta, E.G., 2023. Accommodating students’ learning styles differences in English language classroom. Heliyon, 9(6).

8. Arslan, O., Kamali Arslantas, T., & Baran, E. (2022). Integrating technology into an engineering faculty teaching context: examining faculty experiences and student perceptions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(3), 394-412.

9. Martinez, M., 2022. Microbial screening for melatonin responsive enzymes (Master’s thesis, Boston University).

10. Java, S., Mohammed, H., Bhardwaj, A.B. and Shukla, V.K., 2021. Education 4.0 and Web 3.0 applications in enhancing learning management system: Post-lockdown analysis in covid-19 pandemic. Knowledge Management and Web 3.0: Next Generation Business Models, 2, p.85.

11. Zai, X., 2024. Leveraging Bio-Sensing Technology and IoT for Optimizing Spanish Vocabulary Instruction Across Chinese and Western Cultures: A Biotechnological Approach. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 29(3), pp.305–314.

12. Wang, S., 2024. The role of biomechanics in enhancing cognitive function and learning outcomes in English language teaching. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(2), pp.383–383.

13. Huang, L., Doleck, T., Chen, B., Huang, X., Tan, C., Lajoie, S.P. and Wang, M., 2023. Multimodal learning analytics for assessing teachers’ self-regulated learning in planning technology-integrated lessons in a computer-based environment. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), pp.15823–15843.

14. Liapis, A., Maratou, V., Panagiotakopoulos, T., Katsanos, C. and Kameas, A., 2023. UX evaluation of open MOOC platforms: a comparative study between Moodle and Open edX combining user interaction metrics and wearable biosensors. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), pp.6841–6855.

15. Radhakrishnan, R., 2022. Microbial visualization research based on biosensing technology. Acad. J. Environ. Biol, 3(4), pp.18–25.

16. Jingning, L., 2023. Application of voice network analysis and scheduling joint optimization in the analysis of English learning effectiveness. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, pp.1–11.

17. Khosravi, S., Bailey, S.G., Parvizi, H. and Ghannam, R., 2022. Wearable sensors for learning enhancement in higher education. Sensors, 22(19), p.7633.

18. Wang, Q., 2024. Biomechanics intervention promotes college students’ English vocabulary acquisition and mental health. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(2), pp.459–459.

19. Lyu, W., 2023. Blended Teaching Evaluation Index System Based on AI Emotion Recognition.

20. Zhou, R. and Wang, X., 2024. The biomechanics of language: Using physical movement to improve English writing among Chinese college students. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(3), pp.681–681.

21. Ivković, J. and Stanković, V., Revolutionizing Educational Paradigms: Integrating Precision-Engineered AI into Next-Generation Wearable Technologies.

22. Silva, M., Roberto, R., Radu, I., Cavalcante, P., Schneider, B. and Teichrieb, V., 2023. Development of Design Principles for AR Authoring Tools for Education Based on Teacher’s Perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

23. Yu, S., Shui, X., Hao, S., Zhou, Z., Yu, J., Zhang, D. and Liang, J., 2024, May. Evaluating Children’s Engagement Through Wrist-worn Biosensors and LSTM Network. In 2024 9th International Symposium on Computer and Information Processing Technology (ISCIPT) (pp. 139–143). IEEE.

24. Wang, H., He, M., Zeng, C., Qian, L., Wang, J. and Pan, W., 2023. Analysis of learning behaviour in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 45(4), pp.5927–5938.

25. Williamson, B., 2023. Big Bioinformational Education Sciences: New Biodigital Methods and Knowledge Production in Education. In Postdigital Research: Genealogies, Challenges, and Future Perspectives (pp. 93–114). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Published
2025-02-10
How to Cite
Guo, X. (2025). Research on interactive english classroom teaching based on biosensor technology: Analysis of biological indicators. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 22(2), 935. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb935
Section
Article