Research on the impact of industrial structure upgrading on China’s carbon emissions: Mechanism and test
Abstract
Inspired by biomechanics, studying the relationship between industrial structure upgrading and carbon emissions and the specific impact paths is of great practical significance to the coordinated development of China’s environment and economy. Biomechanics, with its in-depth understanding of the interaction and energy-efficiency principles in natural systems, provides a novel perspective for this study. This paper selected the panel data of 30 provincial administrative regions from 2001 to 2020. Inspired by the concepts of biophysical economics, which are closely related to the energy-matter flow principles in biomechanics, a two-way fixed-effect model of carbon emissions was employed to empirically analyze the relationship between industrial structure upgrading and carbon emissions. Just as biomechanics analyzes the most efficient movement patterns in organisms to minimize energy consumption, this model aims to find the most efficient industrial structure patterns to reduce carbon emissions. The conclusions show that: (1) Industrial structure upgrading can effectively reduce carbon emissions; (2) due to the differences in the economic development levels of different regions, the intensity of industrial structure upgrading on carbon emissions is different. Among them, the effect on the eastern region is the most obvious, followed by the central region, while the effect on the western region and the northeast region is not obvious. (3) Through the mediation effect model, it is found that technological innovation and labor quality improvement are effective ways to upgrade the industrial structure and reduce carbon emissions. Finally, this paper analyzes carbon emission treatment technologies from the direction of biodegradation, which has attracted wide attention due to its environmental friendliness. In biomechanics, natural degradation processes in organisms provide inspiration for human-made biodegradation technologies. Based on biomechanics, six major disposal technologies are compared and analyzed from three aspects: Indirect carbon emissions from operation energy consumption, direct carbon emissions from plastic decomposition and carbon compensation for resource recovery. This paper provides a reference for the selection of waste biodegradation disposal technology from the perspective of helping “double carbon” goal, by drawing on the energy-efficient and sustainable principles from biomechanics.
References
1. Xiang Y, Dai Q. Carbon emission reduction effect and spatial spillover of two-way FDI coordinated development under the “dual carbon” target. Research in Financial Economics. 2022; 37(02): 105–121.
2. Wang Y, Liao M.Research on the emission reduction effect of the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China (Chinese). Science Research Management. 2022; 43(06): 104–112.
3. Zhou Y, Ji P. Effects of industrial upgrading and financial resource allocation efficiency on carbon emission: Based on provincial spatial panel data analysis. East China Economic Management. 2019; 33(12): 59–68.
4. Jiang H, Sun M. Carbon emission trading, Industrial structure and regional emission reduction (Chinese). Modern Economic Research. 2021; (11): 65–73.
5. Yu Z, Fan Y, Luo H. Study on the impact of industrial structure upgrading on carbon emission intensity in China (Chinese). East China Economic Management. 2019; 36(01): 78–87.
6. Yang F, Guo G, Zhang S. Technological innovation, Industrial structure adjustment and energy consumption. China Science and Technology Forum. 2020; (06): 75–84.
7. Zhao Y, Qian Z, Xu X. Study on the impact of industrial structure upgrading on carbon emissions in China under the background of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. Exploration of Economic Issues. 2022; (03): 87–105.
8. Sun Z, Liu R, Li H. Industrial structure adjustment, technological innovation and regional carbon emission reduction: An empirical study based on regional panel data. Reform of Economic System. 2020; (03): 101–108.
9. Zhou D, Wang X. Coupling degree and coupling path between carbon emission efficiency and industrial structure upgrading in China (Chinese). Journal of Natural Resources. 2019; 34(11): 2305–2316.
10. Kosheleva A, Gadaleta G, De Gisi S, et al. Co-digestion of food waste and cellulose-based bioplastic: From batch to semi-continuous scale investigation. Waste Management. 2023; 156: 272–281. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.11.031
11. Tseng HC, Fujimoto N, Ohnishi A. Biodegradability and methane fermentability of polylactic acid by thermophilic methane fermentation. Bioresource Technology Reports. 2019; 8: 100327. doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100327
12. Bandini F, Frache A, Ferrarini A, et al. Fate of biodegradable polymers under industrial conditions for anaerobic digestion and aerobic composting of food waste. Journalof PolymersandtheEnvironment. 2020; 28(9): 2539⁃2550.
13. Abraham A, Park H, Choi O, Sang BI. Anaerobic co-digestion of bioplastics as a sustainable mode of waste management with improved energy production—A review. Bioresource Technology. 2012; 322: 25.
14. Maga D, Hiebel M, Thonemann N. Life cycle assessment of recycling options for polylactic acid. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2019; 149: 86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.018
15. Bátori V, Åkesson D, Zamani A, et al. Anaerobic degradation of bioplastics: A review. Waste Management. 2018; 80: 406–413. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.040
16. Yagi H, Ninomiya F, Funabashi M, Kunioka M. Anaerobic Biodegradation Tests of Poly(lactic acid) under Mesophilic and Thermophilic Conditions Using a New Evaluation System for Methane Fermentation in Anaerobic Sludge. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2009; 10(9): 3824–3835. doi: 10.3390/ijms10093824
17. Sun L, Luo Y. The spatial effect of rationalization of industrial structure on carbon emission. Chongqing Social Sciences. 2022; 335(10): 55–68.
18. Zhao L, Li Y. The impact of industrial structure on carbon emission intensity. Urban Problems. 2018; (06): 61–66.
19. Zang J, Wan L, Li Z, et al. Does emission trading scheme have spillover effect on industrial structure upgrading? Evidence from the EU based on a PSM-DID approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020; 27(11): 12345–12357. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07818-0
20. An H, Xu J, Ma X. Does technological progress and industrial structure reduce electricity consumption? Evidence from spatial and heterogeneity analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2020; 52: 206–220. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2019.11.002
21. Wang B, Zhao C. Green technology innovation in China: Patent statistics and influencing factors (Chinese). Industrial Technical Economics. 2019; 38(07): 53–66.
22. He Y, Lin B. Study on the impact of heterogeneous labor force agglomeration on regional carbon emissions. Population Journal. 2002; 44(04): 39–56.
23. Liu Z, Huang H, Deng X. Population size, industrial structure and energy efficiency: An empirical study based on spatial panel econometric model. Macroeconomic Research. 2022; 285(08): 117–130.
24. Wang Y. Research on local government environmental regulation competition in China based on spatial panel model. Management Review. 2015; 27(8): 23–32.
25. Liu H, Gong M. Factor market distortion and two-way FDI scale effects on carbon emissions (Chinese). China Population, Resources and Environment. 2018; 28(10): 27–35.
26. Ma B, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Research on national finance, industrial innovation and regional coordinated development: Evidence from a moderated multiple intermediary effect model. Research on Macroeconomics. 2021; 274(09): 99–110.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
