Cognitive load detection in English language learning using wearable biosensors: A machine learning approach

  • Lili Qin College of Foreign language, Hechi University, Yizhou 546300, China
  • Weixuan Zhong College of Foreign language, Hechi University, Yizhou 546300, China
Keywords: cognitive load assessment; biosensor technology; English learners; English language tasks; Adaptive Random Forest (ARF); Barnacle Mating Optimization (BMO)
Article ID: 892

Abstract

To increase the use of wearable biosensors in language learning environments, approaches for accurately extracting small signs of cognitive load are necessary. However, assessing subjective cognitive states, such as the load experienced during language acquisition, provides significant obstacles. This research uses data from physiological sensors worn on the wrist, such as skin conductance, skin temperature, heart rate, and R-R intervals, to organize a machine learning (ML) challenge to develop techniques for quantifying cognitive load in English learners. Participants used data from respondents who completed English language tasks of various difficulty levels. A robust evaluation of preprocessing approaches such as Z-score normalization, signal detrending, and moving average filtering, as well as feature extraction methods such as time-domain and frequency-domain analysis, demonstrated that robust models efficiently used biosensor data. Classical classifiers, such as Adaptive Random Forest (ARF), performed better when optimized with Barnacle Mating Optimization (BMO) for hyperparameter tuning. The proposed method of BMO-ARF has attained accuracy at 95.89%, F1-score in the cognitive load of low at 0.95, medium at 0.90 and high at 0.97, sensitivity in the cognitive load of low at 80.3%, medium at 88.5% and high at 93.0% and specificity in the cognitive load of low at 87.5%, medium at 91.8% and high at 95.1%. The results show that cognitive load classifications were more accurate for higher-difficulty tasks and particular learners, potentially impacted by model overfitting and the subjective nature of physiological responses. The research highlights the need for more sophisticated annotation techniques to improve cognitive load monitoring in language learning environments and handle student response variability.

References

1. Sari FM. Exploring English learners’ engagement and their roles in the online language course. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics. 2020; 5(3), pp.349–361.

2. Yang H. Secondary-school Students' Perspectives of Utilizing TikTok for English learning in and beyond the EFL classroom. In 2020 3rd International Conference on Education Technology and Social Science (ETSS 2020) 2020. Vol. 1, pp. 162–83.

3. Sugarman J, Lazarín M., Educating English learners during the COVID-19 pandemic. Migration Policy Institute, 2020; 1, pp.1–30.

4. Rifiyanti H. Learners' perceptions of online English learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scope: Journal of English language teaching, 2020; 5(1), pp.31–35.

5. Syakur A, Fanani Z, Ahmadi R. 2020. The effectiveness of reading English learning process based on blended learning through “Absyak” website media in higher education. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(2), pp.763–772.

6. Degirmenci R. 2021. The use of Quizizz in language learning and teaching from the teachers' and students’ perspectives: A literature review. Language Education and Technology, 1(1), pp.1–11.

7. Syafiq AN, Rahmawati A, Anwari A, Oktaviana T. 2021. Increasing speaking skills through YouTube videos as English learning material during online learning during the pandemic covid-19. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 3(1), pp.50–55.

8. Rozal E, Ananda R, Zb A, et al. 2021. The effect of project-based learning through YouTube presentations on English learning outcomes in physics. AL-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), pp.1924–1933.

9. Anwar K. 2021. The perception of using technology Canva application as a media for English teachers creating media virtual teaching and English learning in loeithailand. Journal of English Teaching, Literature, and Applied Linguistics, 5(1), pp.62–69.

10. Utami AR, Oktaviani L, Emaliana I. 2021. The Use of Video for Distance Learning During Covid-19 Pandemic: Students’ Voice. JET (Journal of English Teaching) Adi Buana, 6(02), pp.153–161.

11. Mavrogordato M, White RS. 2020. Leveraging policy implementation for social justice: How school leaders shape educational opportunity when implementing policy for English learners. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(1), pp.3–45.

12. Rahardjo A, Pertiwi S. 2020. Learning motivation and students’ achievement in learning English. JELITA, 1(2), pp.56–64.

13. Zai X. 2024. Leveraging Bio-Sensing Technology and IoT for Optimizing Spanish Vocabulary Instruction Across Chinese and Western Cultures: A Biotechnological Approach. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 29(3), pp.305–314.

14. Lee H. 2020, October. Supporting instructors to provide emotional and instructional scaffolding for English language learners through biosensor-based feedback. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 733–737).

15. Hijazi H, Couceiro R, Castelhano J, et al. 2021. Intelligent biofeedback augmented content comprehension (tellback). IEEE Access, 9, pp.28393–28406.

16. Hijazi H, Couceiro R, Castelhano J, et al. 2022, June. Intelligent Biofeedback Comprehension Assessment: Theory, Research, and Tools. In 2022 IEEE 21st Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON) (pp. 414–419). IEEE.

17. McNeal KS, Zhong M, Soltis NA, et al. 2020. Biosensors show promise as a measure of student engagement in a large introductory biology course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(4), p.ar50.

18. Herbig N, Düwel T, Helali M, et al. 2020, July. Investigating multi-modal measures for cognitive load detection in e-learning. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM conference on user modeling, adaptation and personalization (pp. 88–97).

19. Hijazi H, Gomes M, Castelhano J, et al. 2024. Dynamically predicting comprehension difficulties through physiological data and intelligent wearables. Scientific Reports, 14(1), p.13678.

20. Wu L, Chau KT, Wan Y, et al. 2024. The Effect of Electroencephalogram Feedback in Virtual Reality Interactive System on Creativity Performance, Attention Value, and Cognitive Load. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, pp.1–18.

21. Muke PZ, Telec Z, Trawiński B. 2022, November. Multimodal Approach to Measuring Cognitive Load Using Sternberg Memory and Input Diagrammatic Reasoning Tests. In Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems (pp. 693–713). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

22. Khosravi S, Bailey SG, Parvizi H, Ghannam R. 2022. Wearable sensors for learning enhancement in higher education. Sensors, 22(19), p.7633.

23. Pavithran M, Ganeshmurthy MS, Periyasamy R. 2024, March. A Robust Algorithm for respiration rate monitoring during cognitive load using PPG Signals. In 2024 Tenth International Conference on Bio Signals, Images, and Instrumentation (ICBSII) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

24. Ahmad MI, Keller I, Robb DA, Lohan KS. 2023. A framework to estimate cognitive load using physiological data. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, pp.1–15.

25. Li K. 2024. Using biosensors and machine learning algorithms to analyze the influencing factors of research tours on students’ mental health. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(1), pp.328–328.

26. Marin E, Unsihuay N, Abarca VE, Elias DA. 2024. Identification of the Biomechanical Response of the Muscles That Contract the Most during Disfluencies in Stuttered Speech. Sensors, 24(8), p.2629.

27. Yang L, Shi Z, Jia R, et al. 2024. Multi-branch deep learning neural network prediction model for the development of angular biosensors based on sEMG. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 12, p.1492232.

28. Markova, Valentina (2020), CLAS: A Database for Cognitive Load, Affect and Stress Recognition, Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/8hm59ryzb8.1

Published
2025-02-19
How to Cite
Qin, L., & Zhong, W. (2025). Cognitive load detection in English language learning using wearable biosensors: A machine learning approach. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 22(3), 892. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb892
Section
Article