Biomechanics-based early warning system for financial crises in advanced manufacturing enterprises using deep learning
Abstract
In response to the increasing demand for lean marketing management, enterprises are leveraging intelligent data technologies for risk management. This paper aims to construct a marketing business risk management model inspired by biomechanics, combining Internet of Things (IoT) technology and BP neural network to provide a proactive early warning mechanism. In constructing the risk management model, this paper draws on the adaptive mechanism in biomechanics, emphasizing the flexibility and responsiveness of the system when facing a complex environment. By simulating how organisms adjust their behavior in a dynamic environment, this paper proposes a project group resource conflict risk assessment model based on BP neural network. The model uses nonlinear fitting and self-learning capabilities to dynamically adjust prediction parameters to adapt to market changes and resource allocation issues. This biomechanically inspired design enables the model to better capture potential risks and improve the accuracy of predictions when processing complex data. In addition, this paper also introduces a Linux-based multi-task embedded management system to achieve seamless integration of the Internet of Things and neural network risk models. The design of this system is inspired by the multi-tasking ability of organisms, which can efficiently switch between multiple tasks, thereby improving the response speed and processing power of the overall system. In this way, enterprises can monitor and manage various risks in marketing operations in real time. The experimental results show that the proposed biomechanically inspired risk management model performs well in practical applications, can effectively model marketing business risks, and provides superior performance. The research in this paper provides new ideas and tools for enterprises to achieve more efficient active risk management in a complex and changing market environment, and emphasizes the importance of biomechanics in the application of intelligent data technology. This not only provides a scientific basis for corporate decision-making, but also points out the direction for future research. By combining the inspiration of biomechanics, companies can better cope with challenges in risk management and enhance their competitiveness.
References
1. Karmanov, M. V., Kiseleva, I. A., Kuznetsov, V. I., & Sadovnikova, N. A. (2021). Marketing strategies: models for assessing efficiency and risk level. Revista Turismo Estudos e Práticas-RTEP/UERN, (01), 1–9.
2. Araz, O. M., Choi, T. M., Olson, D. L., & Salman, F. S. (2020). Role of analytics for operational risk management in the era of big data. Decision Sciences, 51(6), 1320–1346.
3. Byun, C. G., & Ha, H. H. (2020). An Exploratory Study on Successful Factors of Entrepreneurial Marketing in Start-up. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 15(2), 183–192.
4. Cross, S. N., Gustafsson, A., Pechmann, C., & Winterich, K. P. (2022). Responsible research in business and management (RRBM) and the journal of public policy & marketing: connected through impact. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 41(1), 51–53.
5. Bangsawan, S., Haseeb, M., & Ms, M. (2020). A product of social mission, sustainable entrepreneurial and marketing orientation: enhancing social entrepreneurial self-efficacy in Indonesian education sector. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 10(October), 163–178.
6. Guo, C. The Setting and Dynamic Adjustment Mechanism of Law Majors Facing the Development of Regional New Economy. Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing, 120, 43–50.
7. Njeri, G. B. (2021). Influence of credit management on financial performance of dairy marketing cooperatives in Kenya. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management, 6, 10–15.
8. Morrish, S. C., & Jones, R. (2020). Post-disaster business recovery: An entrepreneurial marketing perspective. Journal of Business Research, 113, 83–92.
9. Sharma, P., Leung, T. Y., Kingshott, R. P., Davcik, N. S., & Cardinali, S. (2020). Managing uncertainty during a global pandemic: An international business perspective. Journal of business research, 116, 188–192.
10. Rosário, A., Moniz, L. B., & Cruz, R. (2021). Data science applied to marketing. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 37(5), 1067–1081.
11. Dhameria, V., Ghozali, I., Hidayat, A., & Aryanto, V. (2021). Networking capability, entrepreneurial marketing, competitive advantage, and marketing performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(4), 941–948.
12. Xu, Y., Tao, Y., Zhang, C., Xie, M., Li, W., & Tai, J. (2022). Review of digital economy research in China: a framework analysis based on bibliometrics. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022(1), 2427034.
13. Wang, K. The Construction of Fuzzy Prediction Model of Stock Price Rise and Fall Based on Machine Learning Technology. Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing, 120, 125–136.
14. Behera, R. K., Bala, P. K., Rana, N. P., & Kizgin, H. (2022). Cognitive computing based ethical principles for improving organisational reputation: A B2B digital marketing perspective. Journal of business research, 141, 685–701.
15. Sodhi, R. S., & Bapat, D. (2020). An empirical study of the dimensions of entrepreneurial marketing. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 24(1), 1–7.
16. Azadegan, A., Ojha, D., & Ogden, J. A. (2022). Benefiting from supplier business continuity: The role of supplier monitoring and buyer power. Industrial Marketing Management, 106, 432–443.
17. Eggers, F., Niemand, T., Kraus, S., & Breier, M. (2020). Developing a scale for entrepreneurial marketing: Revealing its inner frame and prediction of performance. Journal of Business Research, 113, 72–82.
18. Ahmed, W., & Huma, S. (2021). Impact of lean and agile strategies on supply chain risk management. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(1–2), 33–56.
19. Kieras, T., Farooq, J., & Zhu, Q. (2021). I-SCRAM: A Framework for IoT Supply Chain Risk Analysis and Mitigation Decisions. IEEE Access, 9, 29827-29840.
20. Nozari, H., Edalatpanah, S.A. (2023). Smart Systems Risk Management in IoT-Based Supply Chain. In: Garg, H. (eds) Advances in Reliability, Failure and Risk Analysis. Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9909-3_11
21. Meng, L. (2021). Using IoT in Supply Chain Risk Management, to Enable Collaboration between Business, Community, and Government. Smart Cities, 4(3), 995-1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4030052
22. Kuashuai Peng, Guofeng Yan. A survey on deep learning for financial risk prediction[J]. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2021, 5(4): 716-737. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2021032
23. Huang, J., Chai, J. & Cho, S. Deep learning in finance and banking: A literature review and classification. Front. Bus. Res. China 14, 13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-020-00082-6
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
