ESG and cost of equity capital: Biophysical and ergonomic considerations from Chinese listed companies

  • Bo Xu School of Accounting, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China
  • Jinghan Chen School of Accounting, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China
  • Chenjie Cao School of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China
Keywords: ESG performance; cost of equity capital; non efficient investment; biophysical factors; ergonomics
Article ID: 829

Abstract

The economic consequences of ESG have been debated between the “stakeholder hypothesis” and the “management self-interest hypothesis”. This study not only analyzes the impact of ESG behavior on the cost of equity capital using panel data and regression models but also delves into the biophysical and ergonomic aspects within the corporate context. ESG initiatives can lead to changes in the work environment and operational processes. For example, improvements in environmental sustainability might involve the installation of ergonomic equipment to reduce employees’ physical strain during work, which in turn could affect their productivity and overall well-being. Socially responsible initiatives may lead to a more harmonious workplace atmosphere, reducing stress levels among employees and potentially influencing their physiological states. The study uses panel data and regression models to analyze the impact of ESG behavior on the cost of equity capital. The findings reveal that corporate ESG behavior significantly reduces the cost of equity capital, supporting the stakeholder hypothesis. Further analysis indicates that this effect is more pronounced in highly market-oriented regions and non-state-owned enterprises, highlighting the roles of market efficiency and organizational flexibility. Additionally, the consideration of biophysical and ergonomic impacts on stakeholders provides a more comprehensive understanding of how ESG strategies can have far-reaching effects within and outside the organization. This research provides empirical evidence for enterprises to actively implement ESG strategies and offers actionable insights for governments to formulate policies that foster sustainable development.

References

1. Corps Daily Commentator. Unswervingly take the road of high-quality development. Corps Daily (Han). 2022-06-14(001).

2. Li Jinglin, Yang Zhen, Chen Jin, Cui Wenqing. Research on the mechanism of ESG promoting corporate performance - based on the perspective of corporate innovation. Science and Science and Technology Management. 2021,42(09):71-89.

3. Kim Jinsung, Kim Minseok, Im Sehyeuk, Choi Donghyun. Competitiveness of E Commerce Firms through ESG Logistics. Sustainability,2021,13(20).

4. Feng, Zifeng, Wu, Zhonghua. ESG Disclosure, REIT Debt Financing and Firm Value. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,2021(prepublished).

5. Li, Zhi-Bin, Shao, Yu-Meng, Li, Zong-Ze, Li, Min-Shi. ESG Disclosure, Media Monitoring and Corporate Financing Constraints. Science Decision Making. 2022(07):1-26.

6. Wang Linlin,Lian Yonghui,Dong Jie.Research on the influence mechanism of ESG performance on corporate value. Securities Market Herald. 2022(05):23-34.

7. Gao J.Y.,Chu D.X.,Lian Y.H.,Zheng J. Can ESG performance improve corporate investment efficiency. Securities Market Herald. 2021(11):24-34+72.

8. XI Longsheng,WANG Yan. Corporate ESG disclosure and stock price crash risk. Economic Issues. 2022(08):57-64.

9. Lv, Z. Problems and Effective Countermeasures in Joint and Several Liability of Civil and Commercial Law Based on Deep Learning Assessment. Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing, 120, 285-293.

10. TONG Menghua, XU Dongyan, ZHENG Timwen. Corporate environmental information disclosure and the cost of equity capital--an analysis of the mediating effect based on information transparency and social responsibility. Research on Financial Issues. 2020(02):63-71.

11. Elakkiya, A. T. A Note on Decomposition of Tensor Product of Complete Multipartite Graphs into Gregarious Kite. Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing, 120, 295-299.

12. HU Tao,LI Dan,GUO Ziming. Is disclosure of subsidiary financial information useful to investors? --Evidence from the Cost of Equity Capital Perspective. Accounting and Economic Research. 2022,36(02):22-39.

13. Xie Hongjun,Lv Xue. Responsible International Investment: ESG and China’s OFDI. Economic Research. 2022,57(03):83-99.

14. Chen, Y., Li, T., Zeng, Q., & Zhu, B. (2023). Effect of ESG performance on the cost of equity capital: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 83, 348-364.

15. Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Ye, C., Li, X., & Tao, Y. (2024). ESG ratings and the cost of equity capital in China. Energy Economics, 107685.

16. Wang, W. Esg Performance on the Financing Cost of A-Share Listed Companies and an Empirical Study. International Journal for Housing Science and Its Applications, 45, 1-7.

17. Yan, Y., Cheng, X., & Ong, T. (2024). Unravelling the Missing Link: Climate Risk, ESG Performance and Debt Capital Cost in China. Sustainability, 16(16), 7137.

18. Hu, J., Zou, Q., & Yin, Q. (2023). Research on the effect of ESG performance on stock price synchronicity: Empirical evidence from China’s capital markets. Finance Research Letters, 55, 103847.

19. Zahid, R. A., Saleem, A., & Maqsood, U. S. (2023). ESG performance, capital financing decisions, and audit quality: empirical evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(15), 44086-44099.

20. Hou, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2024). The Effect and Mechanism of ESG Performance on Corporate Debt Financing Costs: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in the Heavy-Polluting Industries. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 33(2), 1753-1766.

21. Luo, W., Tian, Z., Fang, X., & Deng, M. (2024). Can good ESG performance reduce stock price crash risk? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 1469-1492.

Published
2025-02-11
How to Cite
Xu, B., Chen, J., & Cao, C. (2025). ESG and cost of equity capital: Biophysical and ergonomic considerations from Chinese listed companies. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 22(2), 829. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb829
Section
Article