The relationship between the quality of sports facilities and people’s satisfaction with exercise—The chain mediating effect of active participation and self-efficacy in the context of biomechanics

  • Liping Wang School of Sports, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou 425199, China
  • Ping Wang School of Sports, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou 425199, China
  • Sixuan Sun School of Sports, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou 425199, China
  • Yiling Fan School of Sports, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou 425199, China
Keywords: sports facility quality; active participation; self-efficacy; exercise satisfaction; chain mediation effect; biomechanics
Article ID: 789

Abstract

In order to explore the relationship between active participation and self-efficacy in the quality of sports facilities and exercise satisfaction, this study takes into account the perspective of biomechanics. A survey was conducted among 361 urban residents aged 16 and above in Yongzhou City. The “Sports Facilities Quality Scale”, “Active Participation Scale”, “Self-Efficacy Scale”, and “Exercise Satisfaction Scale” were utilized, with an added consideration of biomechanical factors. Biomechanics, which examines the mechanical aspects of human movement during exercise, provides a crucial framework for understanding how sports facilities interact with the human body. High - quality sports facilities, designed in accordance with biomechanical principles, can significantly influence the physical experience of exercise. For example, the surface material and structure of a running track can affect the impact forces on joints during running, and the ergonomic design of fitness equipment can enhance the efficiency and comfort of movements. These biomechanical factors directly impact a person’s active participation in exercise. When facilities are biomechanically optimized, individuals are more likely to engage actively in physical activities, as they experience less discomfort and reduced risk of injury. The results showed that: 1) The quality of sports facilities, active participation, self-efficacy and exercise satisfaction were significantly correlated with each other. 2) Active participation played a single intermediary role between the quality of sports facilities and exercise satisfaction, accounting for 26.81% of the total effect, and self-efficacy played a single intermediary role between the quality of sports facilities and exercise satisfaction; Active participation and self-efficacy play a chain intermediary role between the quality of sports facilities and exercise satisfaction, accounting for 26.34% of the total effect. Conclusion: Considering biomechanics, the quality of sports facilities indirectly affects the exercise satisfaction of urban residents in Yongzhou City through the chain mediation of active participation and self - efficacy. In the context of national fitness, high - quality sports facilities, designed with biomechanical principles in mind, play a positive and crucial role in promoting residents’ physical exercise, as they can enhance the overall exercise experience from a biomechanical perspective.

References

1. Li MM, Shi YF, and Peng B. The analysis and research on the influence of sports industry development on economic development. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, vol. 2022, pp. 3329174, 2022.

2. Wei W, Deng L. "City dwellers" community sports facilities configuration and optimization from a perspective——Taking the central urban area of Wuhan as an example. Shanghai Urban Planning, vol. 4, pp. 76-83, 2020.

3. Chen H. Study on the optimization of resource allocation for public sports facilities in urban national fitness——From the perspective of configuration satisfaction. Journal of Hebei North University, Social Sciences Edition, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 65-70, 2023.

4. Jin YC, Zhao MY, Tian Y. Research on intelligent adaptive management of sports venues facilities based on artificial intelligence, 2023 Sports Economy and Management Forum and Sports Management Academic Paper Conference Proceedings, 2024.

5. Shi HH. The study on the status of community sports facilities and the demand in Shenzhen Baoan. South China Normal University, 2010

6. Sun YM, Wu YF, and Hu NN. Community sports facility ant colony algorithm collocation under the environment of national fitness. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 12, no. 28, 2022.

7. Hodgkinson IR, Hughes P, and Leone V. Collective organisational publicness versus privateness in community sport: a national panel study of local authorities. European Sport Management Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 564-582, 2021.

8. Lin L, Liu Q, Xiao X, and Luo Q. Perceived constraints on active recreational sport participation among residents in urban China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 22, pp. 14884, 2022.

9. Lu L, and Wei W. Influence of public sports services on residents’ mental health at communities level: New insights from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1143, 2023.

10. de Brabandere M, Vanwesenbeeck I, Hudders L, and Cauberghe V. #workoutathome: How instructions in the captions of fitfluencers’ posts impact adolescents’ body satisfaction and intention to exercise. Health Communication, pp. 1-15, 2024.

11. Li N, Yang Y, Zhao X, and Li Y. The relationship between achievement motivation and college students’ general self-efficacy: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers In Psychology, vol. 13, pp. 1031912, 2023.

12. Mansfield L, Kay T, Anokye N, and Fox-Rushby J. A qualitative investigation of the role of sport coaches in designing and delivering a complex community sport Intervention for increasing physical activity and improving health. BMC Public Health, vol. 18, pp. 1196, 2018.

13. Guo YC, Qin KY, Yu YD, Wang LX, and Xu FL, Zheng Q, Hou X, Zhang Y, Hu B, Hu Q, Gu C, Zheng J. Physical exercise can enhance meaning in life of college students: The chain mediating role of self-efficacy and life satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, pp. 1306257, 2023.

14. Wen SM. Study on the operational effectiveness evaluation and policy development of community sports public service system. Huazhong (Central China) University of Science and Technology, 2023.

15. Rosete, E. N., Candelon, Z. G., Gandal, A., Falle, J. A., & Vivencio Jr, L. C. (2022). Sports facilities and equipment: Availability and students’ satisfaction in the Physical Education classes. Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research, 2(2), 377-380.

16. Mutz, M., Reimers, A.K. & Demetriou, Y. Leisure Time Sports Activities and Life Satisfaction: Deeper Insights Based on a Representative Survey from Germany. Applied Research Quality Life 16, 2155–2171 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09866-7

Published
2025-01-21
How to Cite
Wang, L., Wang, P., Sun, S., & Fan, Y. (2025). The relationship between the quality of sports facilities and people’s satisfaction with exercise—The chain mediating effect of active participation and self-efficacy in the context of biomechanics. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 22(2), 789. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb789
Section
Article