Study on the mechanical properties of biomolecules in watershed water resource management
Abstract
This study focuses on the mechanical properties of biomolecules and their interactions within the extracellular matrix in the context of watershed water resource management. We utilized a modified WEAP-MODFLOW model to explore how these interactions influence the allocation and management of water resources. The WEAP model serves as a comprehensive tool for assessing the balance of surface water supply and demand, while the MODFLOW model is employed for simulating deep groundwater flow. By integrating these models, we can examine the mechanical behavior of biomolecules and cells in response to varying hydrological conditions, thus enhancing our understanding of their role in water resource dynamics. To improve model accuracy, parameters were calibrated using observed flow data from relevant biological systems. Key evaluation metrics, including the coefficient of determination, Nash efficiency coefficient, and deviation coefficient, were employed to assess simulation accuracy. On a monthly scale, the coefficient of determination reached 0.98, indicating a strong correlation between simulated and observed values. The Nash efficiency coefficient was 0.97, reflecting high accuracy in simulating flow dynamics. Furthermore, a deviation coefficient of −12% suggests minimal systematic bias in the simulation results. During the validation phase, these metrics maintained high accuracy, with a determination coefficient of 0.97, a Nash efficiency coefficient of 0.97, and a deviation coefficient of −3.30%. These findings highlight the reliability of the improved WEAP-MODFLOW model in simulating the mechanical properties of biomolecules and their interactions with water resources, ultimately contributing to optimized water resource management strategies.
References
1. Dai H, Iwasaki T, Shimizu Y. Effect of Sediment Supply on Morphodynamics of Free Alternate Bars: Insights from Hydrograph Boundary Layer. Water. 2021; (23): 3437.
2. Wijewardene L, Wu Nai, Giménez GP, Holmboe et al. Epiphyton in Agricultural Streams: Structural Control and Comparison to Epilithon. Water. 2021; (23): 3443.
3. Mirzaei M, Yu H, Dehghani A, et al.A Novel Stacked Long Short-Term Memory Approach of Deep Learning for Streamflow Simulation. Sustainability. 2021; (23): 13384.
4. Sanz RM, Bladé E, González EF, et al. Interpreting the Manning Roughness Coefficient in Overland Flow Simulations with Coupled Hydrological-Hydraulic Distributed Models. Water. 2021; (23): 3433.
5. Gallagher LK, Williams JM, Lazzeri D, et al. Sandtank-ML: An Educational Tool at the Interface of Hydrology and Machine Learning. Water. 2021; (23): 3328.
6. Sharannya TM, Venkatesh K, Mudbhatkal A, et al. Effects of land use and climate change on water scarcity in rivers of the Western Ghats of India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2021; (12): 820.
7. Bai Y, Liu M, Yi J, Zhang H. Temporal stability analysis of soil moisture along a coniferous forest hillslope with subtropical monsoon climate in southwest China. Journal of Mountain Science. 2021; (11): 2900-2914.
8. Lühr R. Spatial cognition in landscape designations in the area of the Old European. Hydronymy Lexicographica. 2021; (1): 59-84.
9. Ndhlovu GZ, Woyessa YE. Evaluation of Streamflow under Climate Change in the Zambezi River Basin of Southern Africa. Water. 2021; (21): 3114.
10. Tuheteru EJ, Gautama RS, Kusuma GJ, et al. Water Balance of Pit Lake Development in the Equatorial Region. Water. 2021. (21),3106.
11. Lubczonek J, Wlodarczyk SM, Lacka M, Zaniewicz G. Methodology for Developing a Combined Bathymetric and Topographic Surface Model Using Interpolation and Geodata Reduction Techniques. Remote Sensing. 2021; (21),4427.
12. Horan R, Rickards NJ, Kaelin A, et al. Extending a Large-Scale Model to Better Represent Water Resources without Increasing the Model’s Complexity. Water. 2021; (21),3067.
13. Raihan F, Ondrasek G, Islam MS, et al. Combined Impacts of Climate and Land Use Changes on Long-Term Streamflow in the Upper Halda Basin, Bangladesh. Sustainability. 2021; (21),12067.
14. De BM, Chidichimo F, Maiolo M, Micallef A. The Impact of Predicted Climate Change on Groundwater Resources in a Mediterranean Archipelago: A Modelling Study of the Maltese Islands. Water. 2021; (21),3046.
15. Sirisena TAJG, Maskey S, Bamunawala J, et al. Projected Streamflow and Sediment Supply under Changing Climate to the Coast of the Kalu River Basin in Tropical Sri Lanka over the 21st Century. Water. 2021; (21),3031.
16. Meilutytė LD, Akstinas V, Pakhomau A, Nazarenko S, Jurgelėnaitė A. Geographical concerns regarding flood hydrology in the southeastern area of the Baltic Sea basin. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 2021; (14),2089-2101.
17. Swarnkar S, Prakash S, Joshi SK, Sinha R. Spatio-temporal rainfall trends in the Ganga River basin over the last century: understanding feedback and hydrological impacts. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 2021; (14),2074-2088.
18. Pass FD. Material evidence of folk hydrology in rural Canada: The well auger and dowsing rods of Hamilton “Ham” Brereton. Water History (pre-publish). 2021; 1-27.
19. Lousada S, Cabezas J, Castanho RA, Gómez JMN. Hydraulic Planning in Insular Urban Territories: The Case of Madeira Island—Ribeira Brava. Water. 2021; (21),2951.
20. Welsh MK, Vidon PG, McMillan SK. Riparian seasonal water quality and greenhouse gas dynamics following stream restoration. Biogeochemistry. 2021; (3),453-474.
21. Abernathy, HN, Chandler RB, Crawford DA, et al. Behavioral responses to ecological disturbances influence predation risk for a capital breeder. Landscape Ecology (pre-publish). 2021; 1-16.
22. Bokhutlo T, Keppeler FW, Winemiller KO. Seasonal hydrology influences energy channels in food webs of rivers in the lower Okavango Delta. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 2021; (10),1303-1319.
23. Lebedeva L, Gustafsson D. Streamflow Changes of Small and Large Rivers in the Aldan River Basin, Eastern Siberia. Water. 2021; (19),2747.
24. Hayashi Y, Christie M, Gaillard JC, et al. A transdisciplinary engagement with Australian Aboriginal water and the hydrology of a small bedrock island. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 2021; (13),1845-1856.
25. Shishegar S, Ghorbani R, Saad SL, Duchesne S, Pelletier G. Rainfall–runoff modelling using octonion-valued neural networks. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 2021; (13),1857-1865.
26. Carmignani JR, Roy AH, Stolarski JT, Richards T. Hydrology of annual winter water level drawdown regimes in recreational lakes of Massachusetts, United States. Lake and Reservoir Management. 2021; (4),339-359.
27. Massotti L, Siemes C, March G, Haagmans R, Silvestrin P. Next Generation Gravity Mission Elements of the Mass Change and Geoscience International Constellation: From Orbit Selection to Instrument and Mission Design. Remote Sensing. 2021; (19),3935.
28. Yamasaki MSC, Ikehara M, Schiebel R. Two-Tiered Transition of the North Atlantic Surface Hydrology during the Past 1.6 Ma: Multiproxy Evidence from Planktic Foraminifera. Paleontological Research. 2021; (4),345-365.
29. Levy J. Episodic basin-scale soil moisture anomalies associated with high relative humidity events in the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Antarctic Science. 2021; (5),533-547.
30. Eilander D, van Verseveld W, Yamazaki D, et al. A hydrography upscaling method for scale-invariant parametrization of distributed hydrological models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2021; (9),5287-5313.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
