Biosensing technology based on biomechanics in psycho analysis: Improving the efficiency of ideological and political education

  • Donghong Lei Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, School of Foreign Language and International Business, Guilin 541004, China
  • Yi Pi Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, School of Foreign Language and International Business, Guilin 541004, China
Keywords: psycho-analysis; biosensing; ideological; political education, electroencephalography (EEG); advanced kookaburra optimizer with poly-kernel support vector machine (AKO-PSVM); biomechanics
Article ID: 601

Abstract

In recent years, advancements in technology have significantly transformed educational paradigms, particularly through the integration of biomechanics in teaching methodologies. The incorporation of biomechanical analysis in educational settings provides valuable insights into students' physical engagement and motor skills development. This study aims to leverage biomechanical data to enhance the effectiveness of physical education and sports training. Biomechanical sensors, such as motion capture systems and wearable devices, collect critical data on parameters like gait, balance, and muscle activity. By analyzing this data, educators can gain a deeper understanding of students' physical performance and identify areas for improvement. We propose a novel biomechanical optimization framework utilizing a multi-kernel support vector machine (MK-SVM) to assess students' physical strain levels during activities. In the preprocessing stage, a median filter is employed to eliminate noise from the motion data. Features are extracted using power spectral density (PSD) analysis to evaluate students' physical responses during instructional activities. The proposed method utilizes algorithms to create personalized training environments, identifying physical responses and facilitating real-time feedback for enhanced engagement in sports and physical education. The MK-SVM algorithm is applied for feature selection, effectively categorizing student strain levels to refine personalized learning strategies. Results indicate that our approach outperforms traditional methods, achieving high accuracy (92%), Recall (98%), precision (80%), and F1-Score (88%) in assessing students' physical strain.   This study demonstrates how biomechanics and technology can revolutionize physical education, fostering more adaptive and responsive learning environments.

References

1. Youguo, L.I. and Jinhong, C.H.E.N.G., 2021. The Important Follows of Improving the Effectiveness of Ideological and Political Education of College Students in the New Era. The Journal of xinyang normal university (philosophy and Social Science edition), 41(3), pp.60-64.

2. Shao, Y., 2023. Research on Improving the Effectiveness of Daily Ideological and Political Education of Higher Vocational Colleges in the New Era. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 4(1), pp.170-172.

3. Cieri, F. and Esposito, R., 2019. Psychoanalysis and neuroscience: the bridge between mind and brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, p.1790.

4. McNeal, K.S., Zhong, M., Soltis, N.A., Doukopoulos, L., Johnson, E.T., Courtney, S., Alwan, A. and Porch, M., 2020. Biosensors show promise as a measure of student engagement in a large introductory biology course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(4), p.ar50.

5. Rizvi, S.L., Ruork, A.K., Yin, Q., Yeager, A., Taylor, M.E. and Kleiman, E.M., 2024. Using Biosensor Devices and Ecological Momentary Assessment to Measure Emotion Regulation Processes: Pilot Observational Study With Dialectical Behavior Therapy. JMIR Mental Health, 11, p.e60035.

6. Attar, E.T., Balasubramanian, V., Subasi, E. and Kaya, M., 2021. Stress analysis based on simultaneous heart rate variability and EEG monitoring. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, 9, pp.1-7.

7. Saeed, S.M.U., Anwar, S.M., Khalid, H., Majid, M. and Bagci, U., 2020. EEG-based classification of long-term stress using psychological labeling. Sensors, 20(7), p.1886.

8. Wu, J.Y., Ching, C.T.S., Wang, H.M.D. and Liao, L.D., 2022. Emerging wearable biosensor technologies for stress monitoring and their real-world applications. Biosensors, 12(12), p.1097.

9. Rokhsaritalemi, S., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. and Choi, S.M., 2023. Exploring emotion analysis using artificial intelligence, geospatial information systems, and extended reality for urban services. IEEE Access.

10. Tu, H., 2023. Analyzing Affective Responses to Virtual Spaces Using Physiological Sensors and Verbal Descriptions (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

11. Carvalho, B., 2024, April. Adorno and Fromm: A debate on psychoanalytic clinical practice. In International Forum of Psychoanalysis (Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 126-138). Routledge.

12. Anapanani, G., 2023. Machine Learning for Biosensors. West Virginia University.

13. Williamson, B., 2023. Big Bioinformational Education Sciences: New Biodigital Methods and Knowledge Production in Education. In Postdigital Research: Genealogies, Challenges, and Future Perspectives (pp. 93-114). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

14. Sethia, D. and Indu, S., 2024. Optimization of wearable biosensor data for stress classification using machine learning and explainable AI. IEEE Access.

15. Bakker, B.N. and Schumacher, G., 2023. Using measures of psychophysiological and neural activity to advance understanding of psychological processes in politics.

16. Pao, G. and Yan, G., Research on the Influence of College Ideological and Political Education on Students’ Mental Health Based on Deep Learning. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1).

17. JuárezVarón, D., Bellido-García, I. and Gupta, B.B., 2023. Analysis of stress, attention, interest, and engagement in onsite and online higher education: A neurotechnological study. Comunicar, 31(76), pp.21-34.

18. Mukherjee, P. and Halder Roy, A., 2023. A deep learning-based approach for distinguishing different stress levels of the human brain using EEG and pulse rate. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, pp.1-22.

19. Chen, Q. and Lee, B.G., 2023. Deep learning models for stress analysis in university students: a sudoku-based study. Sensors, 23(13), p.6099.

20. Pabreja, K., Singh, A., Singh, R., Agnihotri, R., Kaushik, S. and Malhotra, T., 2021. Stress prediction model using machine learning. In Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications: ICAIA 2020 (pp. 57-68). Springer Singapore.

21. Tang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, X. and Wang, Z., 2023. STILN: A novel spatial-temporal information learning network for EEG-based emotion recognition. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 85, p.104999.

22. Sharma, D., Kapoor, N. and Kang, S.S., 2020. Stress prediction of students using machine learning. International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development, 10(3). https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/chtalhaanwar/mental-stress-ppg

23. Suraj Arya, A. and Ramli, N.A., 2024. Predicting the stress level of students using Supervised Machine Learning and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Indian Journal of Engineering, 21, p.e9ije1684.

24. Marouf, A.A., Ashrafi, A.F., Ahmed, T. and Emon, T., 2019. A Machine Learning based Approach for Mapping Personality Traits and Perceived Stress Scale of UndergraduateStudents. International Journal of Modern Education & Computer Science, 11(8).

Published
2025-01-17
How to Cite
Lei, D., & Pi, Y. (2025). Biosensing technology based on biomechanics in psycho analysis: Improving the efficiency of ideological and political education. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 22(2), 601. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb601
Section
Article