Innovative machine learning approach for analysing biomechanical factors in running-related injuries

  • Rui Han Key Laboratory of Sports Engineering of General Administration of Sport of China, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan 430079, China
  • Feng Qi Engineering Research Center of Sports Health Intelligent Equipment of Hubei Province, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan 430079, China;Research Center of Sports Equipment Engineering Technology of Hubei Province, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan 430079, China
  • Hong Wang Engineering Research Center of Sports Health Intelligent Equipment of Hubei Province, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan 430079, China;Research Center of Sports Equipment Engineering Technology of Hubei Province, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan 430079, China
  • Mingnong Yi Key Laboratory of Sports Engineering of General Administration of Sport of China, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan 430079, China
Keywords: biomechanical data; joint angles; ground reaction force; foot pressure; biomechanical analysis; running-related injuries
Article ID: 530

Abstract

Running-related injuries are a significant concern for recreational and competitive athletes, often resulting from complex biomechanical interactions. Traditional injury assessment methods are limited in their ability to capture dynamic, real-time data, necessitating the need for more advanced predictive tools. This study proposes an innovative machine-learning approach to predict running-related injuries by analyzing biomechanical data collected from 84 active runners. The data included joint angles, ground reaction forces, stride length, muscle activation, and foot pressure, captured through wearable sensors during laboratory-controlled and outdoor running sessions. An ensemble model combining Gradient-Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Support Vector Machines (SVM) was developed to predict injury risk. The results indicate that ground reaction force, foot pressure, and stride length were the most significant predictors of injury. The proposed ensemble model achieved an accuracy of 88.37%, outperforming individual models such as GBDT (83.74%) and LSTM (81.29%). The findings suggest that integrating machine learning techniques with biomechanical analysis can significantly enhance the prediction and prevention of running-related injuries. This research offers valuable insights into developing personalized injury prevention strategies, potentially reducing injury occurrence among athletes.

References

1. Herbert, C. (2022). Enhancing mental health, well-being and active lifestyles of university students employing physical activity and exercise research programs—frontiers in public health, 10, 849093.

2. Hsu, C. L., Yang, C. H., Wang, J. H., & Liang, C. C. (2020). Common running musculoskeletal injuries and associated factors among recreational gorge marathon runners: An investigation from 2013 to 2018 taroko gorge marathons. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(21), 8101.

3. Dempster, J., Dutheil, F., & Ugbolue, U. C. (2021). The Prevalence of Lower Extremity Injuries in Running and Associated Risk Factors: A Systematic Review. Physical Activity & Health (2515-2270), 5(1).

4. Leistra, R. J., & Lategan, L. (2022). Running-related injury prevalence in Gauteng long-distance runners over a 12-month period (Doctoral dissertation, University of Johannesburg).

5. Aguillard, E., Cane, J., & Goldstein, A. L. (2023). Run Healthy: The Runner’s Guide to Injury Prevention and Treatment. Human Kinetics.

6. Jacob, A. (2023). Injury Prevention and Rehabilitation in Sports. International Journal of Sports, Yoga and Physical Activity, ISSN: 3005-5083, 2(1), 8-13.

7. Brenner, J. S., Watson, A., Brooks, M. A., Carl, R. L., Briskin, S. M., Canty, G., ... & Emanuel, A. (2024). Overuse injuries, overtraining, and burnout in young athletes. Pediatrics, 153(2).

8. Kalema, R. N., Schache, A. G., Williams, M. D., Heiderscheit, B., Siqueira Trajano, G., & Shield, A. J. (2021). Sprinting biomechanics and hamstring injuries: Is there a link? A literature review. Sports, 9(10), 141.

9. Lin, J. Z., Chiu, W. Y., Tai, W. H., Hong, Y. X., & Chen, C. Y. (2021). Ankle muscle activations during different foot-strike patterns in running. Sensors, 21(10), 3422.

10. Papagiannaki, M., Samoladas, E., Maropoulos, S., & Arabatzi, F. (2020). Running-related injury from an engineering, medical and sport science perspective. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 8, 533391.

11. Agresta, C., Giacomazzi, C., Harrast, M., & Zendler, J. (2022). Running injury paradigms and their influence on footwear design features and runner assessment methods: A focused review to advance evidence-based practice for running medicine clinicians. Frontiers in sports and active living, 4, 815675.

12. Peebles, A. T., Arena, S. L., & Queen, R. M. (2021). A new method for assessing landing kinematics in non-laboratory settings. Physical therapy in sport, 49, 21-30.

13. Hafer, J. F., Vitali, R., Gurchiek, R., Curtze, C., Shull, P., & Cain, S. M. (2023). Challenges and advances in the use of wearable sensors for lower extremity biomechanics. Journal of biomechanics, 111714.

14. Ferris, J. (2023). Advancing Inertial Sensors for Performance Quantification: Applications in Balance Rehabilitation and Distance Running (Doctoral dissertation).

15. S. Sudhakar and S. Chenthur Pandian, (2016), ‘Hybrid Cluster-based Geographical Routing Protocol to Mitigate Malicious Nodes in Mobile Ad Hoc Network, InderScience-International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 224-236. DOI:10.1504/IJAHUC.2016.076358.

16. Lloyd, D. (2021). The future of in-field sports biomechanics: Wearables plus modelling compute real-time in vivo tissue loading to prevent and repair musculoskeletal injuries. Sports Biomechanics, 1-29.

17. Foreman, B., Lissak, I. A., Kamireddi, N., Moberg, D., & Rosenthal, E. S. (2021). Challenges and opportunities in multimodal monitoring and data analytics in traumatic brain injury. Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 21, 1-9.

18. Phatak, A. A., Wieland, F. G., Vempala, K., Volkmar, F., & Memmert, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence-based body sensor network framework—narrative review: proposing an end-to-end framework using wearable sensors, real-time location systems and artificial intelligence/machine learning algorithms for data collection, data mining and knowledge discovery in sports and healthcare. Sports Medicine-Open, 7(1), 79.

19. Hafer, J. F., Vitali, R., Gurchiek, R., Curtze, C., Shull, P., & Cain, S. M. (2023). Challenges and advances in the use of wearable sensors for lower extremity biomechanics. Journal of biomechanics, 111714.

20. Matijevich, E. S., Scott, L. R., Volgyesi, P., Derry, K. H., & Zelik, K. E. (2020). Combining wearable sensor signals, machine learning and biomechanics to estimate tibial bone force and damage during running. Human movement science, 74, 102690.

21. Taye, M. M. (2023). Understanding of machine learning with deep learning: architectures, workflow, applications and future directions. Computers, 12(5), 91.

22. Strielkowski, W., Vlasov, A., Selivanov, K., Muraviev, K., & Shakhnov, V. (2023). Prospects and challenges of the machine learning and data-driven methods for the predictive analysis of power systems: A review. Energies, 16(10), 4025.

23. Ali, Y., Hussain, F., & Haque, M. M. (2024). Advances, challenges, and future research needs in machine learning-based crash prediction models: A systematic review: Accident Analysis & Prevention, 194, 107378.

24. Agresta, C., Giacomazzi, C., Harrast, M., & Zendler, J. (2022). Running injury paradigms and their influence on footwear design features and runner assessment methods: A focused review to advance evidence-based practice for running medicine clinicians. Frontiers in sports and active living, 4, 815675.

25. Cox Jr, L. A. for Decision and Risk Analysis.

26. Weakley, J., Black, G., McLaren, S., Scantlebury, S., Suchomel, T. J., McMahon, E., ... & Read, D. B. (2024). Testing and profiling athletes: recommendations for test selection, implementation, and maximizing information. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 46(2), 159-179.

27. Cecchetto, N. R., Medina, S. M., & Ibargüengoytía, N. R. (2020). Running performance with emphasis on low temperatures in a Patagonian lizard, Liolaemus lineomaculatus. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 14732.

Published
2024-11-15
How to Cite
Han, R., Qi, F., Wang, H., & Yi, M. (2024). Innovative machine learning approach for analysing biomechanical factors in running-related injuries. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(3), 530. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb530
Section
Article