Analysis of athletes’ technical action based on deep learning

  • Xiaoning Zhang Department of the Sports, Xi’an International Studies University, Xi’an 710128, China
Keywords: deep learning; table tennis player; CNN-LSTM; accuracy; technical action analysis
Article ID: 490

Abstract

In order to raise athletes’ technical proficiency and overall performance, this paper uses deep learning technology to precisely assess table tennis technical activities. The paper builds a hybrid neural network model for technical action analysis of table tennis players, based on Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) in deep learning. First, CNN extracts the spatial characteristics from the video frames. After that, an LSTM processes these data in a time series to accurately recognize and classify the movements of athletes. Lastly, through trials, the model is trained and evaluated using the Table Tennis Tracking Network (TTNET) dataset. The experimental findings demonstrate that: (1) In table tennis technical action analysis, the suggested deep learning model performs better than other comparative models. The efficacy of combining convolution with sequence learning is fully demonstrated by the CNN-LSTM hybrid model, which performs best in all indicators when compared to the CNN, LSTM, Multi-Objective Function (MOF), and Convolutional Neural Network—Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) combined models. Its accuracy rate, precision rate, recall rate, and F1 score are 0.923, 0.918, 0.925, and 0.921, respectively. In contrast, the performances of LSTM and CNN are also excellent, but the performance of MOF model is relatively low; (2) In the classification of technical actions, the model has the highest classification accuracy of service, reaching 0.930, and the classification accuracy of other technical actions such as forehand stroke, backhand stroke and spike is also above 0.9, and the time sequence consistency index also maintains a high level, indicating that the model can effectively identify and analyze table tennis technical actions. In addition, the performance evaluation of real-time feedback shows that the model can achieve low processing time and feedback delay in video data processing with different lengths, which ensures the real-time and reliability in practical applications. These results show that the proposed model can not only provide accurate technical action recognition, but also provide timely and effective feedback in practical application, which has high practical value. The results of this paper prove the potential of deep learning technology in the analysis of athletes’ technical actions, and provide scientific basis and effective tools for the technical training and optimization of table tennis players.

References

1. Sun H. Improving the Accuracy of Recognition and Evaluation of Technical Movements of Basketball Players Using Deep Learning Algorithms. Journal of Electrical Systems. 2024; 20(6s): 1959–1969.

2. Rong Z. Optimization of table tennis target detection algorithm guided by multi-scale feature fusion of deep learning. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14(1): 1401.

3. He S. The Application of Deep Learning-Based Technique Detection Model in Table Tennis Teaching and Learning. Systems and Soft Computing. 2024; 1(1): 200116.

4. Lyu L, Huang Y. Sports activity (SA) recognition based on error correcting output codes (ECOC) and convolutional neural network (CNN). Heliyon. 2024; 10(6):23–43.

5. Chen ZH, Zhang GQ. CNN sensor based motion capture system application in basketball training and injury prevention. Preventive Medicine. 2023; 174(12): 107644.

6. Gao Y, Qian Q, Sun X, et al. Evaluation model of athletes’ lower extremity training ability based on LSTM algorithm. Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol. 2024; 21(1): 147–157.

7. Khobdeh SB, Yamaghani MR, Sareshkeh SK. Basketball action recognition based on the combination of YOLO and a deep fuzzy LSTM network. The Journal of Supercomputing. 2024; 80(3): 3528–3553.

8. Song H, Li Y, Fu C, et al. Using complex networks and multiple artificial intelligence algorithms for table tennis match action recognition and technical-tactical analysis. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 2024; 178(2): 114343.

9. Yenduri S, Chalavadi V. Adaptive temporal aggregation for table tennis shot recognition. Neurocomputing. 2024; 584(1): 127567.

10. Zhang J, Ren Y, Lin L, et al. Table tennis motion recognition based on the bat trajectory using varying-length-input convolution neural networks. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14(1): 3549.

11. Host K, Pobar M, Ivasic-Kos M. Analysis of movement and activities of handball players using deep neural networks. Journal of imaging. 2023; 9(4): 80.

12. Zhao L. A hybrid deep learning-based intelligent system for sports action recognition via visual knowledge discovery. IEEE Access. 2023; 11(8): 46541–46549.

13. Cheng L. Athletes’ Action Recognition and Posture Estimation Algorithm Based on Image Processing Technology. Journal of Electrical Systems. 2024; 20(6s): 2059–2069.

14. Li X, Ullah R. An image classification algorithm for football players’ activities using deep neural network. Soft Computing. 2023; 27(24): 19317–19337.

15. Liu L. Objects detection toward complicated high remote basketball sports by leveraging deep CNN architecture. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2021; 119(1): 31–36.

16. Li W. Application of IoT-enabled computing technology for designing sports technical action characteristic model. Soft Computing. 2023; 27(17): 12807–12824.

17. Omarov B, Nurmash N, Doskarayev B, et al. A Novel Deep Neural Network to Analyze and Monitoring the Physical Training Relation to Sports Activities. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 2023; 14(9): 22–31.

18. Leddy C, Bolger R, Byrne PJ, et al. The application of Machine and Deep Learning for technique and skill analysis in swing and team sport-specific movement: A systematic review. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport. 2024; 23(1): 110–145.

19. Sarwar MA, Lin YC, Daraghmi YA, et al. Skeleton Based Keyframe Detection Framework for Sports Action Analysis: Badminton Smash Case. IEEE Access. 2023; 11(12): 90891–90900.

20. Wang TY, Cui J, Fan Y. A wearable-based sports health monitoring system using CNN and LSTM with self-attentions. Plos one. 2023; 18(10): e0292012.

21. Sun X, Wang Y, Khan J. Hybrid LSTM and GAN model for action recognition and prediction of lawn tennis sport activities. Soft Computing. 2023; 27(23): 18093–18112.

22. Li X, Luo R, Islam FU. Tracking and detection of basketball movements using multi-feature data fusion and hybrid YOLO-T2LSTM network. Soft Computing. 2024; 28(2): 1653–1667.

23. Pajak G, Krutz P, Patalas-Maliszewska J, et al. An approach to sport activities recognition based on an inertial sensor and deep learning. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 2022; 345(2): 113773.

24. Zhang Q, Zhang X, Hu H, et al. Sports match prediction model for training and exercise using attention-based LSTM network. Digital Communications and Networks. 2022; 8(4): 508–515.

25. Petrov E, Ivanov D. Neural Signal Denoising in Sports Biomechanics: Dynamic Arrow Characterization with Stacking Ensemble of Hybrid CNN-RNN. Journal of Humanities and Applied Science Research. 2022; 5(1): 89–103.

Published
2024-11-26
How to Cite
Zhang, X. (2024). Analysis of athletes’ technical action based on deep learning. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(3), 490. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb490
Section
Article