Behavioral prediction and health benefit evaluation of leisure sports activities based on multi-physiological characteristics analysis

  • Hui Wang Shanghai Jian Qiao University, Shanghai 201306, China
  • Bin Liu Shanghai Jian Qiao University, Shanghai 201306, China
Keywords: analysis of physiological characteristics; leisure sports; physical fitness and health; Lasso; GBDT
Ariticle ID: 207

Abstract

Leisure sports activities, as a healthy form of entertainment, have garnered increasing recognition. This paper introduces a data analysis model designed for behavior prediction and health benefit evaluation in leisure sports activities, utilizing multiple physiological features. The proposed model offers recommendations for leisure sports activities and provides health assessment results based on an array of physiological feature data. Constructed using a combination of Lasso (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) and GBDT (Gradient Boosting Decision Tree) regression models within the Stacking ensemble learning framework, the model leverages physiological feature data from the dataset for training. Experimental results reveal that the combined prediction model achieves a coefficient of determination of 0.9832, effectively mitigating the impact of pathological data on model fitting and demonstrating superior accuracy and stability compared to individual prediction models. Finally, this paper explores the future prospects of wearable devices for physiological feature data collection and the potential advancements in behavior prediction and health benefit evaluation methods based on such information.

References

1. Ling P. Interpretation of leisure sports in the pandemic situation of COVID 19. World Leisure Journal. 2020; 62(4): 319-321. doi: 10.1080/16078055.2020.1828786

2. Le Hénaff Y, Héas S. Engagement in leisure and physical activities: analysing the biographical disruptions of a rare chronic disease in France. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2019; 42(1): 65-79. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12987

3. Iqbal SMA, Mahgoub I, Du E, et al. Advances in healthcare wearable devices. npj Flexible Electronics. 2021; 5(1). doi: 10.1038/s41528-021-00107-x

4. Zhao Y, Shang Y, Song W, et al. Follow-up study of the pulmonary function and related physiological characteristics of COVID-19 survivors three months after recovery. EClinicalMedicine. 2020; 25: 100463. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100463

5. Gambhir E, Jain R, Gupta A, et al. Regression Analysis of COVID-19 using Machine Learning Algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Smart Electronics and Communication (ICOSEC); 2020. doi: 10.1109/icosec49089.2020.9215356

6. O’Donoghue P, Cullinane A. A regression-based approach to interpreting sports performance. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2011; 11(2): 295-307. doi: 10.1080/24748668.2011.11868549

7. Wang H. Retracted Article: Change of offshore surface water temperature characteristics based on Bayesian regression and physical recovery of sports training. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2021; 14(15). doi: 10.1007/s12517-021-07934-2

8. Zhou Y, Lu W, Zhang Y. Real-time monitoring of sports performance based on ensemble learning algorithm and neural network. Soft Computing; 2023. doi: 10.1007/s00500-023-08628-5

9. Wang ZR, Cai YG. Semi-disabled elderly remote health monitoring big data missing processing. Electronic Technology & Software Engineering; 2023.

10. Wang K, Ho CH, Tian C, et al. Optical health analysis of visual comfort for bright screen display based on back propagation neural network. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2020; 196: 105600. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105600

11. Gao H, Wu C, Huang D, et al. Prediction of fetal weight based on back propagation neural network optimized by genetic algorithm. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering. 2021; 18(4): 4402-4410. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021222

12. Gregori D, Petrinco M, Bo S, et al. Regression models for analyzing costs and their determinants in health care: an introductory review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2011; 23(3): 331-341. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr010

13. Kozlovskaia M, Vlahovich N, Rathbone E, et al. A profile of health, lifestyle and training habits of 4720 Australian recreational runners—The case for promoting running for health benefits. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 2018; 30(2): 172-179. doi: 10.1002/hpja.30

14. Yang F, Li J, Liu S, et al. Lasso-GBDT-based Investment Forecasting for Distribution Transformer Replacement Projects. In: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuits and Communication Systems (ICICACS); 2023. doi: 10.1109/icicacs57338.2023.10100179

15. Bernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Corrigendum to: Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2020; 50(3): 1045-1045. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa118

16. Zhang YM, Wang H, Bai Y, et al. Bayesian dynamic regression for reconstructing missing data in structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring. 2022; 21(5): 2097-2115. doi: 10.1177/14759217211053779

17. Shafiee S, Lied LM, Burud I, et al. Sequential forward selection and support vector regression in comparison to LASSO regression for spring wheat yield prediction based on UAV imagery. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2021; 183: 106036. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106036

18. Yazdi M, Golilarz NA, Nedjati A, et al. An improved lasso regression model for evaluating the efficiency of intervention actions in a system reliability analysis. Neural Computing and Applications. 2021; 33(13): 7913-7928. doi: 10.1007/s00521-020-05537-8

19. Seto H, Oyama A, Kitora S, et al. Gradient boosting decision tree becomes more reliable than logistic regression in predicting probability for diabetes with big data. Scientific Reports. 2022; 12(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20149-z

20. Mansaray LR, Kanu AS, Yang L, et al. Dynamic modelling of rice leaf area index with quad-source optical imagery and machine learning regression models. Geocarto International. 2020; 37(3): 828-840. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2020.1745299

21. Koopialipoor M, Asteris PG, Salih Mohammed A, et al. Introducing stacking machine learning approaches for the prediction of rock deformation. Transportation Geotechnics. 2022; 34: 100756. doi: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100756

22. Aboneh T, Rorissa A, Srinivasagan R. Stacking-Based Ensemble Learning Method for Multi-Spectral Image Classification. Technologies. 2022; 10(1): 17. doi: 10.3390/technologies10010017

23. Tennison I, Roschnik S, Ashby B, et al. Health care's response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2021; 5(2): e84-e92. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30271-0

24. Lenzen M, Malik A, Li M, et al. The environmental footprint of health care: a global assessment. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2020; 4(7): e271-e279. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30121-2

Published
2024-08-19
How to Cite
Wang, H., & Liu, B. (2024). Behavioral prediction and health benefit evaluation of leisure sports activities based on multi-physiological characteristics analysis. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21, 207. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb.v21.207
Section
Article