Research and effect analysis of the collaborative role of mobile technology and intelligent management on rural tourism from biomechanical and molecular perspectives
Abstract
This research adopts a scientific perspective based on biomechanics and molecular-level analysis to explore the synergistic mechanisms and implementation effects of mobile technology and intelligent management systems in rural tourism. The study constructs a three-dimensional “technology-human-environment” framework, employing mixed research methods and a multi-case research strategy to conduct experiments at eight different types of rural tourism destinations across three representative provinces in China, recruiting 458 effective sample participants who wore lightweight wearable motion capture systems and other multimodal biomechanical data collection devices, while simultaneously testing the “BioPark” mobile application and “SmartRural” intelligent management system in coordination. The findings reveal that tourists exhibit significantly different biomechanical characteristics and molecular physiological indicator patterns in various terrain environments, such as knee joint maximum torque being significantly higher on steep slopes than on flat ground (1.64 ± 0.27 vs. 0.87 ± 0.16 Nm/kg, p < 0.001), and cortisol/endorphin ratio showing a strong negative correlation with satisfaction (r = −0.72, p < 0.001). Mobile technology primarily influences experience through three pathways: information enhancement, experience optimization, and interaction enhancement, while the intelligent management system improves decision-making accuracy by 48.3% and resource allocation efficiency by 28.3%. The synergistic effect of the systems produces results exceeding the simple addition of individual systems through three mechanisms: data sharing (path coefficient 0.73), functional complementarity (0.68), and information feedback (0.61), resulting in increased overall tourist satisfaction by 28.1% (p < 0.001), extended stay duration by 36.4% (p < 0.001), and improved actual revisit rates by 77.8% (p < 0.01). Based on these results, the study proposes “physiologically friendly” rural tourism spatial design principles and technology-management collaborative optimization strategies, establishing a biological data-driven service closed-loop system that provides theoretical support and technical solutions for the scientific development of rural tourism, while also discussing research limitations and future development trends.
References
1. Niu W. Development and Application of a Sitting Posture Rehabilitation Management System Based on Biomechanics. Medical Biomechanics. 2024; 39(S1): 158.
2. Zhong H. Biomechanical Analysis of Sports Injuries During College Students’ Military Training and Protective Safety Education Strategies. Medical Biomechanics. 2023; 38(02): 416.
3. Wu H, Wang P. Comparative Study on Biomechanical Properties and Applications of Two Orthopedic Fixation Materials. China Medical Equipment. 2017; 14(07): 48-51.
4. Yoon YC, Kim JW, Kim TK, et al. Comparative biomechanical analysis of reconstruction and cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of osteoporotic subtrochanteric fractures. Injury. 2024; 55(6): 111512. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111512
5. Jin G, Zou M, Li L, et al. Corneal biomechanics and their association with severity of lens dislocation in Marfan syndrome. International Ophthalmology. 2024; 44(1). doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03079-9
6. Gao D, Lee JP, Chen J, et al. A wearable pneumatic-piezoelectric system for quantitative assessment of skeletomuscular biomechanics. Device. 2024; 2(3): 100288. doi: 10.1016/j.device.2024.100288
7. Tang D. Exploration of the Application of Biomechanics in Sports Training Based on Artificial Intelligence. Medical Biomechanics. 2024; 39(05): 1014.
8. Guo H, Kang Z, Bai X, et al. Characteristics and Advantages of Finite Element Analysis Technology in Knee Joint Biomechanics Applications. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. 2025. 29(15): 3253-3261.
9. Wei Y, Liu X, Zhou P. Biomechanical Issues in Intelligent Rehabilitation Engineering. Biomedical Engineering Research. 2024; 43(02): 87-91. doi: 10.19529/j.cnki.1672-6278.2024.02.01
10. Niu W. Biomechanical Issues in Intelligent Rehabilitation Engineering. Medical Biomechanics. 2021: 36(S1): 117.
11. Mehboob A, Mehboob H, Ouldyerou A, et al. Computational biomechanical analysis of Ti-6Al-4V porous bone plates for lower limb fractures. Materials & Design. 2024; 240: 112842. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112842
12. Byun SE, Suh IW, Lee S. Biomechanical stability and stress distribution in intertrochanteric fracture of femur fixation by Titanium Alloy (Ti-6Al-4 V) nailing systems according to fracture reduction: A finite element analysis. Results in Engineering. 2025; 25: 104202. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104202
13. Firouzi N, Garziera R, Holzapfel GA, et al. Mechanics of finite nonlinear viscoelastic growth for soft biological tissues. Thin-Walled Structures. 2025; 210: 112996. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2025.112996
14. Tjønneland A, Nielsen PT, Jakobsen T. Biomechanics of a collum-fixated short stem in total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedics. 2024; 52: 61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.02.027
15. Wang Z, Wang X. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Biomechanical Response of Type I and Type II Cadherin Dimers. Journal of Tianjin University of Technology. 2025; 41(02): 140-145.
16. Mensah EA, Daneshtalab N, Tabrizchi R. Effects of vasoactive substances on biomechanics of small resistance arteries of male and female Dahl salt‐sensitive rats. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives. 2024; 12(2). doi: 10.1002/prp2.1180
17. Xie X, Fu Y, Wang Z, et al. Research Progress on the Mechanism of Biomechanics in Regulating the Biological Characteristics of Osteoblasts. Journal of Hubei University of Medicine. 2024; 43(06): 702-708. doi: 10.13819/j.issn.2096-708X.2024.06.024
18. Wang Q, Bi H, Fan H, et al. Analysis of Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Femtosecond LASIK Combined with Accelerated Cross-linking for High Myopia Based on Corvis ST. Recent Advances in Ophthalmology. 2024; 44(08): 632-636. doi: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2024.0121
19. Fan C, Cheng S. Exercise Translational Medicine: Viewing Active Health through the Lens of Molecular Biomechanics. Sport Science. 2024; 44(01): 3-11+20. doi: 10.16469/j.css.202401001
20. Chen W. Commentary on Cellular and Molecular Biomechanics Section. Medical Biomechanics. 2023; 38(02): 209-211. doi: 10.16156/j.1004-7220.2023.02.001
21. Li. Research Progress and Trends of Sports Biomechanics in the Context of Artificial Intelligence. China Leather. 2023; 52(01): 70-72. doi: 10.13536/j.cnki.issn1001-6813.2023-001-015
22. Wu X, Qu Y, Liu S, et al. Development and Application of Intelligent Analysis and Feedback System for Ski Jumping Technique Biomechanics. China Sport Science and Technology. 2021; 57(12): 3-8. doi: 10.16470/j.csst.2021120
23. Huang G, Fan Y, Xiao X, et al. Biomechanical Optimization of Standing Long Jump Action and Establishment of Artificial Intelligence Evaluation Model. Medical Biomechanics. 2021; 36(S1): 337.
24. Gu Y, Sun D, Mei Q. Research Ideas and Insights for Sports Shoe Biomechanics Development Under the Background of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport. 2021; 45(02): 64.
25. Zhang F, Chen Y. Knee Joint Biomechanical Measurement Platform Based on Industrial Robot. Metrology & Measurement Technology. 2020; 47(10): 36-39. doi: 10.15988/j.cnki.1004-6941.2020.10.011
26. Wu T, Zhang J. Application of Sports Biomechanics in Sports Equipment Based on Artificial Intelligence. Think Tank Era. 2020; (01): 152-153.
27. Kassam HF, Valk J, Wiseman S, et al. Glenoid component cyclical failure decreases with increasing baseplate contact: a biomechanical study. Seminars in Arthroplasty: JSES. 2025; 35(1): 22-30. doi: 10.1053/j.sart.2024.08.002
28. Liu Y, Cui H, Song C, et al. Material Design and Biomechanical Research of Anal Fistula Plug. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology. 2023; 45(05): 488-494+502. doi: 10.13255/j.cnki.jusst.20220119004
29. Li Z, Wang X. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Biomechanical Response of Homo- and Hetero-trimeric Type I Collagen. Journal of Tianjin University of Technology. 2022; 38(05): 53-58.
30. Fan H, Bi H, Wang X, et al. Efficacy of Excimer Laser Central Multifocal Aspheric Ablation Mode for Presbyopia and Its Effect on Corneal Biomechanics. Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2021; 29(03): 220-225.
31. Feng Y, He R, Qu M, et al. Comparative Study on the Biomechanical Effects After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK with Different Optical Zones. Chinese Journal of Laser Medicine. 2021; 30(01): 51-52.
32. Meng Q, Wang X, Chen W et al. Finite Element Simulation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties Detected by Corvis ST. Journal of Biomedical Engineering. 2020; 37(04): 608-613.
33. Wang H, Xiao H, Yan Z. Comparative Study on Corneal Biomechanics After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK. Journal of Taishan Medical College. 2020; 41(08): 561-563.
34. Li J, Wei S, Zhang Y, et al. Long-term Corneal Biomechanical Assessment After Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis. Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2020; 28(02): 147-150.
35. Li J, Wei S, Zhang Y, et al. Study on Long-term Corneal Biomechanical (ORA) Assessment After Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis LASIK Surgery. Medical Biomechanics. 2019; 34(S1): 169.
36. Zhang J, Liu Y, Tang H. Enzyme Kinetics and Molecular Docking Study on the Interaction Between Natural Product Salvianolic Acid A and Xanthine Oxidase. Journal of Anhui University of Engineering. 2019; 34(03): 1-5+60.
37. Xing X, Li S, Zhao A, et al. Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK on Corneal Biomechanical Properties. Recent Advances in Ophthalmology. 2018; 38(12): 1161-1164. doi: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0274
38. Song Y, He R, Zhou Y. Long-term Observation of Corneal Biomechanical Status After LASIK for Myopic Astigmatism in Thin Corneas. Chinese Journal of Laser Medicine. 2017; 26(02): 74-79+116. doi: 10.13480/j.issn1003-9430.2017.0074
39. Du M, Liu K, Lai H, et al. Functional meniscus reconstruction with biological and biomechanical heterogeneities through topological self-induction of stem cells. Bioactive Materials. 2024; 36: 358-375. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.03.005
40. Maxwell L, Nava T, Norrish A, et al. Locking vs. non-locking plate fixation in comminuted talar neck fractures: a biomechanical study using cadaveric specimens. The Foot. 2024; 59: 102084. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2024.102084
41. Khaliliyan H, Sharafatvaziri A, Safaeepour Z, et al. Gait and muscle activity measures after biomechanical device therapy in subjects with ankle instability: A systematic review. The Foot. 2024; 59: 102083. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2024.102083
42. Makani NH, Kumar P, Paul T, et al. Low-dimensional halide perovskite/PVDF nanocomposite with enhanced piezoelectricity as flexible biomechanical energy harvester. Chemical Physics Impact. 2024; 8: 100564. doi: 10.1016/j.chphi.2024.100564
43. Fiedler MJ, Triplett NT, Hamilton KC, et al. The Effect of Different Weight Plate Widths (Bumper vs. Standard) on the Biomechanics of the Bench Press. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2024; 38(4): e143-e149. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000004679
44. Garlapaty A, Cook JL, Bezold W, et al. Activated nitinol compression staples are associated with favorable biomechanical properties for talonavicular arthrodesis. Journal of Orthopaedics. 2024; 52: 90-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.02.032
45. Nicolás Carrillo A, Ruiz Casquet J, Hernández Morante JJ, et al. Cervical misalignment in motorcyclists in relation to new helmet removal recommendations shown with augmented reality resources: A biomechanical analysis. Heliyon. 2024; 10(6): e27428. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27428
46. Holzapfel GA, Ogden RW. Biomechanical stresses in a residually stressed idealized intervertebral disc. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics. 2024; 161: 104687. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2024.104687
47. Kim HHS, Lakadamyali M. Microscopy methods to visualize nuclear organization in biomechanical studies. Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering. 2024; 30: 100528. doi: 10.1016/j.cobme.2024.100528
48. Munyensanga P, Bricha M, El Mabrouk K. Functional characterization of biomechanical loading and biocorrosion resistance properties of novel additively manufactured porous CoCrMo implant: Comparative analysis with gyroid and rhombic dodecahedron. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2024; 316: 129139. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.129139
49. Gu Y, Zheng Z, Zeng Q, et al. Acute effects of negative heel shoes on perceived pain and knee biomechanical characteristics of runners with patellofemoral pain. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 2024; 17(1). doi: 10.1002/jfa2.12001
50. Alunni V, Alessandrini E, Bernardi C, et al. Biomechanics of motorboat propeller injuries: how can a pattern of trauma be related to a propeller and a boat? International Journal of Legal Medicine. Published online February 14, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s00414-025-03438-w
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
