Application of biomechanics in sports rehabilitation

  • Nannan Zhang Jilin Animation Institute, Changchun 130012, Jilin, China
Keywords: sports rehabilitation; biomechanical technology; kinematic index; muscle strength value
Article ID: 178

Abstract

The application of biomechanical methods and techniques in rehabilitation treatment has been explored to deepen understanding of the health recovery of injured athletes, thereby improving their efficacy and quality. There are various methods for using biomechanics, which can help people understand the patient’s movement characteristics and mechanical changes, evaluate the patient’s recovery progress, and optimize the plan. Therefore, this article mainly conducted research and analysis on the application of biomechanics in sports rehabilitation, and explained the specific role of biomechanics in it by comparing before and after sports rehabilitation in different situations. The results showed that after treatment with biomechanical methods, the patient’s muscle strength increased by 9.4%–20.93% compared to the original, and the power value increased by 0.8–4.56 watts. The effect was good for achieving 71.28% muscle activity, and there was also a significant improvement in its sports mechanics indicators. After receiving biomechanical treatment, the quality of motor skills in patients was over 60%, which showed significant improvement compared to before treatment. Therefore, when conducting sports rehabilitation, biomechanical treatment plans should be used to achieve better therapeutic effects.

References

1. Farì G, Santagati D, Macchiarola D, et al. Musculoskeletal pain related to surfing practice: Which role for sports rehabilitation strategies? A cross-sectional study. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2022; 35(4): 911-917. doi: 10.3233/bmr-210191

2. De Fazio R, Mastronardi VM, De Vittorio M, et al. Wearable Sensors and Smart Devices to Monitor Rehabilitation Parameters and Sports Performance: An Overview. Sensors. 2023; 23(4): 1856. doi: 10.3390/s23041856

3. Yung KK, Ardern CL, Serpiello FR, et al. Characteristics of Complex Systems in Sports Injury Rehabilitation: Examples and Implications for Practice. Sports Medicine—Open. 2022; 8(1). doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00405-8

4. Dixon G, McGeary D, Silver JK, et al. Trends in gender, race, and ethnic diversity among prospective physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians. PM&R. 2023; 15(11): 1445-1456. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12970

5. Wong J, Kudla A, Pham T, et al. Lessons Learned by Rehabilitation Counselors and Physicians in Services to COVID-19 Long-Haulers: A Qualitative Study. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 2021; 66(1): 25-35. doi: 10.1177/00343552211060014

6. Loveland PM, Reijnierse EM, Island L, et al. Geriatric home‐based rehabilitation in Australia: Preliminary data from an inpatient bed‐substitution model. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2022; 70(6): 1816-1827. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17685

7. Ba H. Medical Sports Rehabilitation Deep Learning System of Sports Injury Based on MRI Image Analysis. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics. 2020; 10(5): 1091-1097. doi: 10.1166/jmihi.2020.2892

8. Ardern CL, Büttner F, Andrade R, et al. Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021; 56(4): 175-195. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-103987

9. Ebert JR, Webster KE, Edwards PK, et al. Current Perspectives of the Australian Knee Society on Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2020; 29(7): 970-975. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0291

10. DiSanti J, Lisee C, Erickson K, et al. Perceptions of Rehabilitation and Return to Sport Among High School Athletes With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Qualitative Research Study. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2018; 48(12): 951-959. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.8277

11. Greenberg EM, Greenberg ET, Albaugh J, et al. Rehabilitation Practice Patterns Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Survey of Physical Therapists. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2018; 48(10): 801-811. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.8264

12. Hamill J, Knutzen KM, Derrick TR. Biomechanics: 40 Years On. Kinesiology Review. 2021; 10(3): 228-237. doi: 10.1123/kr.2021-0015

13. Glazier PS, Mehdizadeh S. Challenging Conventional Paradigms in Applied Sports Biomechanics Research. Sports Medicine. 2018; 49(2): 171-176. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-1030-1

14. Phellan R, Hachem B, Clin J, et al. Real‐time biomechanics using the finite element method and machine learning: Review and perspective. Medical Physics. 2020; 48(1): 7-18. doi: 10.1002/mp.14602

15. Ma J, Wang Y, Wei P, et al. Biomechanics and structure of the cornea: implications and association with corneal disorders. Survey of Ophthalmology. 2018; 63(6): 851-861. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.05.004

16. Wang Y, Tan Q, Pu F, et al. A Review of the Application of Additive Manufacturing in Prosthetic and Orthotic Clinics from a Biomechanical Perspective. Engineering. 2020; 6(11): 1258-1266. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.07.019

17. Morrison C, Huckvale K, Corish B, et al. Visualizing Ubiquitously Sensed Measures of Motor Ability in Multiple Sclerosis. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems. 2018; 8(2): 1-28. doi: 10.1145/3181670

18. Stein AM, Grupp SA, Levine JE, et al. Tisagenlecleucel Model‐Based Cellular Kinetic Analysis of Chimeric Antigen Receptor–T Cells. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology. 2019; 8(5): 285-295. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12388

19. Luo L, Guo X, Zhang Z, et al. Insight into Pyrolysis Kinetics of Lignocellulosic Biomass: Isoconversional Kinetic Analysis by the Modified Friedman Method. Energy & Fuels. 2020; 34(4): 4874-4881. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00275

20. Morone G, Cocchi I, Paolucci S, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for arm recovery for stroke patients: state of the art and clinical implication. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2020; 17(3): 223-233. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1733408

21. Yozbatiran N, Francisco GE. Robot-assisted Therapy for the Upper Limb after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 2019; 30(2): 367-384. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2018.12.008

22. Yamada K, Iwasaki N, Sudo H. Biomaterials and Cell-Based Regenerative Therapies for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration with a Focus on Biological and Biomechanical Functional Repair: Targeting Treatments for Disc Herniation. Cells. 2022; 11(4): 602. doi: 10.3390/cells11040602

23. Seo JH, Kim MS, Lee JH, et al. Biomechanical Efficacy and Effectiveness of Orthodontic Treatment with Transparent Aligners in Mild Crowding Dentition—A Finite Element Analysis. Materials. 2022; 15(9): 3118. doi: 10.3390/ma15093118

24. Avci T, Omezli MM, Torul D. Investigation of the biomechanical stability of Cfr-PEEK in the treatment of mandibular angulus fractures by finite element analysis. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2022; 123(6): 610-615. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.05.008

25. Onyibo EC, Safaei B. Application of finite element analysis to honeycomb sandwich structures: a review. Reports in Mechanical Engineering. 2022; 3(1): 283-300. doi: 10.31181/rme20023032022o

26. Barath Kumar MD, Manikandan M. Assessment of Process, Parameters, Residual Stress Mitigation, Post Treatments and Finite Element Analysis Simulations of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Technique. Metals and Materials International. 2021; 28(1): 54-111. doi: 10.1007/s12540-021-01015-5

27. Güvercin Y, Abdioğlu AA, Dizdar A, et al. Suture button fixation method used in the treatment of syndesmosis injury: A biomechanical analysis of the effect of the placement of the button on the distal tibiofibular joint in the mid-stance phase with finite elements method. Injury. 2022; 53(7): 2437-2445. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.037

28. Banovetz MT, Roethke LC, Rodriguez AN. Meniscal root tears: a decade of research on their relevant anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment. Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2022; 10(5): 366.

29. Wang C, Hou M, Zhang C, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a modified intramedullary nail for the treatment of unstable femoral trochanteric fractures. Heliyon. 2024; 10(8): e29671. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29671

30. van der Kruk E, Reijne MM. Accuracy of human motion capture systems for sport applications; state‐of‐the‐art review. European Journal of Sport Science. 2018; 18(6): 806-819. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1463397

31. Gohel V, Mehendale N. Review on electromyography signal acquisition and processing. Biophysical Reviews. 2020; 12(6): 1361-1367. doi: 10.1007/s12551-020-00770-w

32. DeKeyser GJ, Hakim AJ, O’Neill DC, et al. Biomechanical and anatomical considerations for dual plating of distal femur fractures: a systematic literature review. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2021; 142(10): 2597-2609. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03988-9

33. Feng F, Liu M, Pan L, et al. Biomechanical Regulatory Factors and Therapeutic Targets in Keloid Fibrosis. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2022; 13. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.906212

34. Duan C, Jimenez JM, Goergen C, et al. Hydration State and Hyaluronidase Treatment Significantly Affect Porcine Vocal Fold Biomechanics. Journal of Voice. 2023; 37(3): 348-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.01.014

35. Willemsen K, Tryfonidou M, Sakkers R, et al. Patient‐specific 3D‐printed shelf implant for the treatment of hip dysplasia: Anatomical and biomechanical outcomes in a canine model. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2021; 40(5): 1154-1162. doi: 10.1002/jor.25133

36. Nordenholm A, Senorski EH, Westin O, et al. Surgical treatment of chronic Achilles tendon rupture results in improved gait biomechanics. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2022; 17(1). doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02948-2

Published
2024-08-06
How to Cite
Zhang, N. (2024). Application of biomechanics in sports rehabilitation. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21, 178. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb.v21.178
Section
Article