Integrated biomechanical-thermomechanical approach for hydration heat management in hollow concrete piers: Balancing structural integrity and construction ergonomics
Abstract
This study investigates temperature field variations and associated risks in tall hollow concrete bridge piers caused by cement hydration heat during construction. Integrating field measurements and numerical simulations, we analyzed the dynamic evolution of internal temperature distribution and its structural implications. Field experiments involved continuous temperature monitoring using high-precision sensors embedded in critical zones (core, surface, and varying depths) of a representative pier. Concurrently, a 3D finite element model was developed in ANSYS, incorporating nonlinear thermal properties, the Priestley temperature-dependent hydration model, and realistic boundary conditions. Transient thermal analysis simulated hydration-induced temperature evolution, validated against experimental data. Results revealed significant temperature gradients, with core temperatures rising rapidly due to restricted heat dissipation in large-volume piers. Hydration heat peaked at approximately 70% of maximum temperature within 28 h post-pouring, reaching full intensity at 50 h. Key influencing factors included concrete mix design, cement type, environmental conditions, and cross-sectional dimensions. Post-formwork removal, surface cracking risks escalated due to abrupt temperature differentials, inducing tensile stresses exceeding early-age concrete strength. Mitigation strategies emphasized optimized formwork removal timing, low-heat cement blends (e.g., incorporating fly ash or slag), and enhanced curing techniques (moisture retention, insulation) to regulate thermal gradients. Furthermore, the study highlighted occupational health risks from concentrated heat release, proposing measures such as adjusted work schedules, cooling systems, and protective equipment to safeguard workers. These findings provide actionable insights for balancing structural integrity, construction efficiency, and labor safety in large-scale concrete infrastructure projects. The environmental chamber testing results showed that in a hot environment, the mean skin temperature (35.8 ℃ vs. 36.59 ℃), heart rate (110 beats/min vs. 116 beats/min) and core temperature of the subjects with NCV were significantly lower than those with the control (without NCV). The intelligent monitoring system equipped with sensors has an early warning response time of one minute and a false alarm rate of less than 1%.
References
1. Zhou J, Li X, Wang Z, et al. Numerical Analysis of Temperature Stress Generated by Hydration Heat in Massive Concrete Pier. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering. 2025. doi: 10.3311/ppci.38403
2. Wang S, Xu J, Zhong R. Temperature control technology on construction of large volume concrete. Advances in Engineering Technology Research. 2024; 11(1): 388. doi: 10.56028/aetr.11.1.388.2024
3. Klemczak B, Smolana A. Multi-Step Procedure for Predicting Early-Age Thermal Cracking Risk in Mass Concrete Structures. Materials. 2024; 17(15):3700. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17153700
4. Savioli G, Zanza C, Longhitano Y, et al. Heat-Related Illness in Emergency and Critical Care: Recommendations for Recognition and Management with Medico-Legal Considerations. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(10): 2542. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10102542
5. Torbat Esfahani M, Awolusi I, Hatipkarasulu Y. Heat stress prevention in construction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors and control strategies. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2024; 1(12): 681. doi: 0.3390/ijerph21121681
6. Al-rawi RS, Salih S mahdi. Control o Thermal And Shrinkage Cracking o Mass Concrete in Hot Climate. Journal of Engineering. 2024; 9(02): 195-205. doi: 10.31026/j.eng.2003.02.04
7. Saksala T. Demolition of concrete by thermal shock spallation: a mesoscopic numerical study based on embedded discontinuity finite elements. International Journal of Fracture. 2020; 225(2): 191-217. doi: 10.1007/s10704-020-00474-y
8. Stacey MJ, Delves SK, Britland SE, et al. Copeptin reflects physiological strain during thermal stress. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2017; 118(1): 75-84. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3740-8
9. Sudarshan A, Tewari M. The economic impacts of temperature on industrial productivity: Evidence from Indian manufacturing. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi. 2014.
10. Zheng G, Li K, Bu W, et al. The Effects of Indoor High Temperature on Circadian Rhythms of Human Work Efficiency. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(5): 759. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050759
11. Dear K. Modelling Productivity Loss from Heat Stress. Atmosphere. 2018; 9(7): 286. doi: 10.3390/atmos9070286
12. Tokizawa K. Heat-induced labor loss and growing global concerns in a warmer world. Industrial health. 2022; 60(6): 499-500. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.60_600
13. Pradhan B, Kjellstrom T, Atar D, et al. Heat Stress Impacts on Cardiac Mortality in Nepali Migrant Workers in Qatar. Cardiology. 2019; 143(1-2): 37-48. doi: 10.1159/000500853
14. Guo Y, Chan AP, Wong FK, et al. Developing a hybrid cooling vest for combating heat stress in the construction industry. Textile Research Journal. 2017; 89(3): 254-269. doi: 10.1177/0040517517743685
15. Del Ferraro S, Falcone T, Morabito M, et al. A potential wearable solution for preventing heat strain in workplaces: The cooling effect and the total evaporative resistance of a ventilation jacket. Environmental Research. 2022; 212: 113475. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113475
16. Kim JH, Jo BW, Jo JH, et al. Development of an IoT-Based Construction Worker Physiological Data Monitoring Platform at High Temperatures. Sensors. 2020; 20(19): 5682. doi: 10.3390/s20195682
17. Li L, Yu J, Cheng H, et al. A Smart Helmet-Based PLS-BPNN Error Compensation Model for Infrared Body Temperature Measurement of Construction Workers during COVID-19. Mathematics. 2021; 9(21): 2808. doi: 10.3390/math9212808
18. Yabuki N, Onoue T, Fukuda T, et al. A heatstroke prediction and prevention system for outdoor construction workers. Visualization in Engineering. 2013; 1(1). doi: 10.1186/2213-7459-1-11
19. Willingham BD, Ragland TJ, Ormsbee MJ. Betaine Supplementation May Improve Heat Tolerance: Potential Mechanisms in Humans. Nutrients. 2020; 12(10): 2939. doi: 10.3390/nu12102939
20. Baizhan L, Andrew B. Meeting the challenge of climatic heat stress in construction. Industrial health. 2018; 56(4): 275-277. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.56_400
21. Asher M.S TD, McAndrew I. Heat Illness Prevention in the Outdoor Workplace. Health Informatics—An International Journal. 2021; 10(02): 1-4. doi: 10.5121/hiij.2021.10201
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.