Principles of biomolecular migration and diffusion in education and teaching reform: Exploration and practice of interdisciplinary research
Abstract
With the rapid development of science and technology and the continuous progress of society, the traditional educational and teaching model of single subjects can hardly meet the needs of future talent cultivation. As an emerging research paradigm that breaks disciplinary barriers, integrates multidisciplinary knowledge, and solves complex problems, interdisciplinary research is gradually becoming an important direction of educational and teaching reform. This research integrates the biomolecular migration and diffusion principles into interdisciplinary education reform. By setting up an experimental group and a control group of students, a series of teaching activities were carried out. Finally, the teaching effectiveness was evaluated through statistical analysis of students’ test scores and other relevant data. The results show that under the interdisciplinary teaching model combined with biomolecular migration and diffusion principles, students’ innovative thinking, problem-solving abilities, and comprehensive qualities have all been improved. This study provides references for educational and teaching reform.
References
1. Drake SM, Reid JL. 21st Century Competencies in Light of the History of Integrated Curriculum. Frontiers in Education. 2020; 5. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.00122
2. De Matías Batalla D, Bueno Pedrero A. Metaverse to foster learning in higher education. Metaverse. 2023; 4(1): 16. doi: 10.54517/m.v4i1.2184
3. Yang M. Research on the value of disciplines in the cultivation of interdisciplinary talents. Hunan University of Science and Technology. 2023. doi: 10.27738/d.cnki.ghnkd.2023.000316
4. Wu H, Tian L. Interdisciplinary thematic learning: Origin, connotation and implementation suggestions. Global Education Prospects; 2023.
5. Zhang T, Hu N. Twenty years of interdisciplinary research on basic education in China: overall situation, hot topics and change trends—based on the analysis of articles published in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (2000–2020). Educational Theory and Practice; 2023.
6. Klein JT. A Platform for a Shared Discourse of Interdisciplinary Education. JSSE—Journal of Social Science Education. 2006. doi: 10.4119/JSSE-344
7. Bi Z. Research on the interdisciplinary graduate training mechanism in American research universities. Northeast Normal University; 2023. doi: 10.27011/d.cnki.gdbsu.2023.000906
8. Sun H. The role and challenges of teachers in interdisciplinary education. Primary School Science; 2024.
9. Zhao Y. Practical research on cultivating students’ life concepts based on interdisciplinary education. Henan Normal University; 2023. doi: 10.27118/d.cnki.ghesu.2023.000990
10. National Research Council. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Washington: The National Academics Press; 2007.
11. Harrison LM, Hurd E, Brinegar K, et al. Integrative and Interdisciplinary Curriculum in the Middle School. Routedge Research in Education; 2020. doi: 10.4324/9780429352522
12. Berthaume M, Elton S. Biomechanics in anthropology. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 2024; 33(2). doi: 10.1002/evan.22019
13. Bayne H, Albertus Y, Breen S, et al. Biomechanics without Borders: Teaching Biomechanics in Brazil and South Africa. Advances in Physiology Education. 2021; 45(1): 34–36. doi: 10.1152/advan.00182.2020
14. Martay JLB, Martay H, Carpes FP. BodyWorks: interactive interdisciplinary online teaching tools for biomechanics and physiology teaching. Advances in Physiology Education. 2021; 45(4): 715–719. doi: 10.1152/advan.00069.2021
15. Riskowski JL. Teaching undergraduate biomechanics with Just-in-Time Teaching. Sports Biomechanics. 2015; 14(2): 168–179. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2015.1030686
16. Garceau LR, Ebben WP, Knudson DV. Teaching practices of the undergraduate introductory biomechanics faculty: a North American survey. Sports Biomechanics. 2012; 11(4): 542–558. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2012.725764
17. Knudson D, Noffal G, Bauer J, et al. Development and evaluation of a biomechanics concept inventory. Sports Biomechanics. 2003; 2(2): 267–277. doi: 10.1080/14763140308522823
18. Thistlethwaite JE, Davies D, Ekeocha S, et al. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23. Medical Teacher. 2012; 34(6): e421–e444. doi: 10.3109/0142159x.2012.680939
19. Ochia R. A Hybrid Teaching Method for Undergraduate Biomechanics Lab. Biomedical Engineering Education. 2020; 1(1): 187–193. doi: 10.1007/s43683-020-00033-w
20. Hsieh C, Knudson D. Student factors related to learning in biomechanics. Sports Biomechanics. 2008; 7(3): 398–402. doi: 10.1080/14763140802233207
21. Sun R. Research on the composition and cultivation of interdisciplinary teaching literacy of primary school science teachers. Southwest University; 2020. doi: 10.27684/d.cnki.gxndx.2020.003011
22. Zhang H. On understanding-based interdisciplinary learning. Basic Education Curriculum; 2018.
23. Wan K. The connotation, characteristics and design implementation of interdisciplinary learning: Taking information technology courses as an example. Journal of Tianjin Normal University (Basic Education Edition). 2022
24. Xu D, Feng H, Cui Y, et al. Teaching design and investigation of interdisciplinary courses: Taking “radiation biological effects” as an example. Higher Science Education; 2023.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
