Application of biomechanics and deep learning models in water quality monitoring

  • Na Lu School of Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan Technology and Business University, Wuhan 430065, China; Institute of Information and Intelligent Engineering Applications, Wuhan Technology and Business University, Wuhan 430065, China
  • Dan Zheng School of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Wuhan Technology and Business University, Wuhan 430065, China
  • Fang Deng School of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Wuhan Technology and Business University, Wuhan 430065, China
  • Wenting Yang School of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Wuhan Technology and Business University, Wuhan 430065, China
  • Yifeng Ren School of Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan Technology and Business University, Wuhan 430065, China
Keywords: biomechanics; deep learning; water quality monitoring
Article ID: 1589

Abstract

This paper reviews the application of biomechanics and deep learning models in water quality monitoring, highlighting their potential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of environmental pollution detection and prediction. Traditional water quality monitoring methods are difficult to deal with nonlinear and dynamic pollution data. This article reviews the fusion application of biomechanical models and deep learning (such as convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM)), and proves that it significantly improves monitoring accuracy (an average of 20% in cases) by simulating pollutant diffusion mechanisms (biomechanics) and mining complex data patterns (deep learning). In the future, it is necessary to establish an interdisciplinary collaboration framework to promote the deployment of lightweight models in real-time systems.

References

1. Li W, Zhao Y, Zhu Y, et al. Research progress in water quality prediction based on deep learning technology: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2024; 31(18): 26415-26431. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33058-7

2. Irwan D, Ali M, Ahmed AN, et al. Predicting Water Quality with Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Methods and Applications. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. 2023; 30(8): 4633-4652. doi: 10.1007/s11831-023-09947-4

3. Li Q, Li Z. Research on Failure Pressure Prediction of Water Supply Pipe Based on GA-BP Neural Network. Water. 2024; 16(18): 2659. doi: 10.3390/w16182659

4. de la Fuente A, Meruane V, Meruane C. Hydrological Early Warning System Based on a Deep Learning Runoff Model Coupled with a Meteorological Forecast. Water. 2019; 11(9): 1808. doi: 10.3390/w11091808

5. Li Z. Deep Learning-Based Hydrological Time Series Prediction Model and Interpretability Quantitative Analysis Study [PhD thesis]. Huazhong University of Science and Technology; 2023.

6. Li Z, Kang L, Zhou L, et al. Deep Learning Framework with Time Series Analysis Methods for Runoff Prediction. Water. 2021; 13(4): 575. doi: 10.3390/w13040575

7. Shen C. A Transdisciplinary Review of Deep Learning Research and Its Relevance for Water Resources Scientists. Water Resources Research. 2018; 54(11): 8558-8593. doi: 10.1029/2018wr022643

8. Silver D, Huang A, Maddison CJ, et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature. 2016; 529(7587): 484-489. doi: 10.1038/nature16961

9. Bello IT, Taiwo R, Esan OC, et al. AI-enabled materials discovery for advanced ceramic electrochemical cells. Energy and AI. 2024; 15: 100317. doi: 10.1016/j.egyai.2023.100317

10. Choi JB, Nguyen PCH, Sen O, et al. Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Energetic Materials by Design: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Directions. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics. 2023; 48(4). doi: 10.1002/prep.202200276

11. He W, Liu T, Ming W, et al. Progress in prediction of remaining useful life of hydrogen fuel cells based on deep learning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2024; 192: 114193. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.114193

12. Ming W, Sun P, Zhang Z, et al. A systematic review of machine learning methods applied to fuel cells in performance evaluation, durability prediction, and application monitoring. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2023; 48(13): 5197-5228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.10.261

13. He W, Li Z, Liu T, et al. Research progress and application of deep learning in remaining useful life, state of health and battery thermal management of lithium batteries. Journal of Energy Storage. 2023; 70: 107868. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107868

14. Xia M, Li T, Xu L, et al. Fault Diagnosis for Rotating Machinery Using Multiple Sensors and Convolutional Neural Networks. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics. 2018; 23(1): 101-110. doi: 10.1109/tmech.2017.2728371

15. Geng Z, Zhang Y, Li C, et al. Energy optimization and prediction modeling of petrochemical industries: An improved convolutional neural network based on cross-feature. Energy. 2020; 194: 116851. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116851

16. Wang J, Li X, Li J, et al. NGCU: A New RNN Model for Time-Series Data Prediction. Big Data Research. 2022; 27: 100296. doi: 10.1016/j.bdr.2021.100296

17. Ouyang P, Yin S, Wei S. A Fast and Power Efficient Architecture to Parallelize LSTM based RNN for Cognitive Intelligence Applications. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Design Automation Conference 2017. Published online June 18, 2017: 1-6. doi: 10.1145/3061639.3062187

18. Güldal V, Tongal H. Comparison of Recurrent Neural Network, Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System and Stochastic Models in Eğirdir Lake Level Forecasting. Water Resources Management. 2009; 24(1): 105-128. doi: 10.1007/s11269-009-9439-9

19. Cai B, Yu Y. Flood forecasting in urban reservoir using hybrid recurrent neural network. Urban Climate. 2022; 42: 101086. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101086

20. Kim BJ, Lee YT, Kim BH. A Study on the Optimal Deep Learning Model for Dam Inflow Prediction. Water. 2022; 14(17): 2766. doi: 10.3390/w14172766

21. Wang Y, Wang W, Zang H, et al. Is the LSTM Model Better than RNN for Flood Forecasting Tasks? A Case Study of HuaYuankou Station and LouDe Station in the Lower Yellow River Basin. Water. 2023; 15(22): 3928. doi: 10.3390/w15223928

22. Karbasi M, Jamei M, Ali M, et al. Development of an enhanced bidirectional recurrent neural network combined with time-varying filter-based empirical mode decomposition to forecast weekly reference evapotranspiration. Agricultural Water Management. 2023; 290: 108604. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108604

23. Ayele EG, Ergete ET, Geremew GB. Predicting the peak flow and assessing the hydrologic hazard of the Kessem Dam, Ethiopia using machine learning and risk management centre-reservoir frequency analysis software. Journal of Water and Climate Change. 2024; 15(2): 370-391. doi: 10.2166/wcc.2024.320

24. Wang Q, Huang J, Liu R, et al. Sequence-based statistical downscaling and its application to hydrologic simulations based on machine learning and big data. Journal of Hydrology. 2020; 586: 124875. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124875

25. Kao IF, Liou JY, Lee MH, et al. Fusing stacked autoencoder and long short-term memory for regional multistep-ahead flood inundation forecasts. Journal of Hydrology. 2021; 598: 126371. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126371

26. Huang PC. An effective alternative for predicting coastal floodplain inundation by considering rainfall, storm surge, and downstream topographic characteristics. Journal of Hydrology. 2022; 607: 127544. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127544

27. Botunac I, Bosna J, Matetić M. Optimization of Traditional Stock Market Strategies Using the LSTM Hybrid Approach. Information. 2024; 15(3): 136. doi: 10.3390/info15030136

28. Choi JY, Lee B. Combining LSTM Network Ensemble via Adaptive Weighting for Improved Time Series Forecasting. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2018; 2018: 1-8. doi: 10.1155/2018/247017

29. Hinchi AZ, Tkiouat M. Rolling element bearing remaining useful life estimation based on a convolutional long-short-term memory network. Procedia Computer Science. 2018; 127: 123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.106

30. Jiang S, Zheng Y, Wang C, et al. Uncovering Flooding Mechanisms Across the Contiguous United States Through Interpretive Deep Learning on Representative Catchments. Water Resources Research. 2022; 58(1). doi: 10.1029/2021wr030185

31. Hu C, Wu Q, Li H, et al. Deep Learning with a Long Short-Term Memory Networks Approach for Rainfall-Runoff Simulation. Water. 2018; 10(11): 1543. doi: 10.3390/w10111543

32. Fang K, Shen C, Kifer D, et al. Prolongation of SMAP to Spatiotemporally Seamless Coverage of Continental U.S. Using a Deep Learning Neural Network. Geophysical Research Letters. 2017; 44(21). doi: 10.1002/2017gl075619

33. Le XH, Ho HV, Lee G, et al. Application of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Neural Network for Flood Forecasting. Water. 2019; 11(7): 1387. doi: 10.3390/w11071387

34. Gu H, Xu YP, Ma D, et al. A surrogate model for the Variable Infiltration Capacity model using deep learning artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrology. 2020; 588: 125019. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125019

Published
2025-03-05
How to Cite
Lu, N., Zheng, D., Deng, F., Yang, W., & Ren, Y. (2025). Application of biomechanics and deep learning models in water quality monitoring. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 22(4), 1589. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb1589
Section
Article