Study on the enhancement of ecosystem service function and sustainability planning of landscape gardening based on biomechanics

  • Ping Yang Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou 571126, China
  • Yi Zhang Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou 571126, China
  • Nanrong Qin Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou 571126, China
Keywords: biomechanics; landscaping; ecosystem services; sustainability planning; plant growth
Article ID: 1555

Abstract

With the acceleration of urbanization and the impact of climate change, landscape gardening plays an increasingly important role in improving urban ecological environments, enhancing biodiversity and improving ecological service functions. Based on the principle of biomechanics, this paper discusses the strategy of enhancing the ecosystem service function of landscape gardening and proposes to optimize the sustainability of landscape gardening by means of multi-scale planning frameworks, ecological corridor construction, and microclimate regulation techniques. Through the implementation of biomechanical optimization practices in the study area, in this study, multiple technical methods were used for data collection to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data. For monitoring plant growth, a regular sampling method was adopted to measure growth parameters (such as plant height, crown width, root depth, etc.) of plants in the study area on a monthly basis. In addition, high-precision meteorological monitoring equipment (such as temperature and humidity meters, anemometers, etc.) was used for continuous monitoring of microclimate conditions, with a data collection time span of one year, covering seasonal changes. Soil stability assessment quantifies soil stability and water management capacity through regular sampling of different soil types, using soil shear tests and water retention capacity tests. All data were processed using statistical analysis methods and combined with model simulations to validate the effectiveness of optimization strategies, ensuring the scientific and reproducible nature of research results. It was found that the optimization of vegetation configuration, soil structure and water flow management could significantly improve soil and water conservation capacity, wind speed regulation and microclimate regulation. The high density of vegetation not only enhanced the soil water retention capacity but also effectively reduced the wind speed and improved the local climate environment. In addition, the construction of ecological corridors and reasonable vegetation layout enhances the ecological connectivity and stability of the landscape. By evaluating the sustainability under different seasons, this paper further discusses how to dynamically optimize the landscape according to seasonal changes to ensure the stability of its long-term ecological service function.

References

1. Ennaji N, Ouakhir H, Abahrour M, et al. Impact of watershed management practices on vegetation, land use changes, and soil erosion in River Basins of the Atlas, Morocco. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2024; 52(1): 13567. doi: 10.15835/nbha52113567

2. Ouakhir H, Ennaji N, Spalevic V, et al. Changes in River Bank Morphology in A Small Meander Of El Abid River, Atlas Mountains, Morocco. The Journal “Agriculture and Forestry.” 2023; 69(3). doi: 10.17707/agricultforest.69.3.14

3. Amraoui M, El amrani M, Mijanovic D, et al. Agriculture and Economic Development of The Ait Werra Tribe During the French Colonialism Period and Its Local Characteristics (1912-1956) Within the Middle Atlas Region of Morocco. The Journal “Agriculture and Forestry.” 2023; 69(4). doi: 10.17707/agricultforest.69.4.07

4. Du X. Biomechanical perspectives on bio-molecular environmental regulation: Long-term strategies. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics. 2024; 21: 83. doi: 10.62617/mcb.v21.83

5. Kleyer M. Enhancing landscape planning: Vegetation-mediated ecosystem services predicted by plant traits. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2021; 215: 104220. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104220

6. Remme RP, Frumkin H, Guerry AD, et al. An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2021; 118(22). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018472118

7. Santos M, Moreira H, Cabral JA, et al. Contribution of Home Gardens to Sustainable Development: Perspectives from A Supported Opinion Essay. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(20): 13715. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013715

8. Bolliger J, Silbernagel J. Contribution of Connectivity Assessments to Green Infrastructure (GI). ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2020; 9(4): 212. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9040212

9. Vashist M, Singh SK, Kumar TV. Enhancing resilience for sustainable cities: a review of threats to urban trees. Biodiversity and Conservation. Published online February 2, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s10531-025-03025-w

10. Philpott SM, Bichier P, Perez G, et al. Land tenure security and luxury support plant species and trait diversity in urban community gardens. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2023; 7. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1195737

11. Kempa D, Karrasch L, Schlurmann T, et al. Design and Insights Gained in a Real-World Laboratory for the Implementation of New Coastal Protection Strategies. Sustainability. 2023; 15(5): 4623. doi: 10.3390/su15054623

12. Xing K, Xia Y. Biomechanics based computer simulation of rural landscape design using remote sensing image technology. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics. 2024; 21(4): 371. doi: 10.62617/mcb371

13. Tiwary A, Brown N. Emerging Perspectives on Diverse Nature-Oriented Sustainability Strategies. Sustainability. 2024; 16(2): 881. doi: 10.3390/su16020881

14. Barnes MR, Watkins E. ‘Greenness’ in the Eye of the Beholder: Comparing Perceptions of Sustainability and Well-being Between Artificial and Natural Turfgrass. Cities and the Environment. 2022; 15(1). doi: 10.15365/cate.202.150102

15. Fahed MA, Samaha S, Kattar S, et al. Rangeland Management and Rehabilitation: The Case of Rangelands from Raachine to Mchaa Kfardebian, Lebanon. International Journal of BioLife Sciences (IJBLS). 2024; 3(3): 296-321.

16. Sainsbury LB, Slater D. Changes in paved space, green infrastructure and tree canopy cover in front gardens: A case study of two contrasting housing estates in Liverpool, England. Arboricultural Journal. 2023; 45(2): 152-172.

17. Mairaing W, Jotisankasa A, Leksungnoen N, et al. A Biomechanical Study of Potential Plants for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization of Highland in Thailand. Sustainability. 2024; 16(15): 6374.

18. Zhang M, Zhang L, He H, et al. Improvement of ecosystem quality in national key ecological function zones in China during 2000–2015. Journal of environmental management. 2022; 324: 116406.

Published
2025-03-12
How to Cite
Yang, P., Zhang, Y., & Qin, N. (2025). Study on the enhancement of ecosystem service function and sustainability planning of landscape gardening based on biomechanics. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 22(4), 1555. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb1555
Section
Article