Digital technology and child development: Theoretical basis and literature review from economic and biomechanical perspective
Abstract
This review examines the impact of digital technology on child development, integrating economic and biomechanical perspectives. I reviewed existing literature, drawing upon human capital theory, skill formation theory, and parenting style theory, to establish a comprehensive framework for understanding this multifaceted issue. The current body of research suggests a concerning trend: Increased digital technology use often coincides with reduced physical activity and increased sedentary behavior. This shift potentially alters the mechanical environment experienced by children’s developing bodies, raising concerns about musculoskeletal development, motor skill acquisition, and long-term health outcomes. At present, there have been some studies in related fields, but there is a lack of overall review and integration. For better understanding and conducting studies, some suggestions were given: Investigations should focus on dose-response relationships between digital technology exposure and biomechanical outcomes, while also considering the influence of moderating factors such as age, sex, pre-existing conditions, and parenting styles. By clarifying the underlying mechanisms, we can inform the development of evidence-based interventions and guidelines to promote optimal physical development and ensure the well-being of children in the increasingly digital world.
References
1. Fisher A, Reilly JJ, Kelly LA, et al. Fundamental movement skills and habitual physical activity in young children. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2005; 37(4): 684–688. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000159138.48107.7d
2. Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Cliff DP, et al. Fundamental movement skills in children and adolescents. Sports Medicine. 2010; 40(12): 1019–1035. doi: 10.2165/11536850-000000000-00000
3. Qin YX, Zhao J. Mechanobiology in cellular, molecular, and tissue adaptation. Mechanobiology in Medicine. 2023; 1(2): 100022. doi: 10.1016/j.mbm.2023.100022
4. Teixeira PN. Gary Becker’s early work on human capital – collaborations and distinctiveness. IZA Journal of Labor Economics. 2014; 3(1): 1–20. doi: 10.1186/s40172-014-0012-2
5. Le Chapelain C, Matéos S. Schultz and the concept of human capital: An intellectual trajectory (French). Revue d’économie Politique. 2020; 130(1): 5–25. doi: 10.3917/redp.301.0005
6. Schultz TW. Investment in human capital. The American economic review. 1961; 51(1): 1–17.
7. Becker GS. Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Political Economy. 1962; 70(5): 9–49. doi: 10.1086/258724
8. Gibbons R, Waldman M. Task-Specific Human Capital. American Economic Review. 2004; 94(2): 203–207. doi: 10.1257/0002828041301579
9. Bach A, Shaffer G, Wolfson T. Digital human capital: Developing a framework for understanding the economic impact of digital exclusion in low-income communities. Journal of Information Policy. 2013; 3: 247–266. doi: 10.5325/jinfopoli.3.2013.0247
10. Grimpe C, Sofka W, Kaiser U. Competing for digital human capital: The retention effect of digital expertise in MNC subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies. 2023; 54(4): 657–685. doi: 10.1057/s41267-021-00493-4
11. Cunha F, Heckman JJ, Lochner L, Masterov DV. Chapter 12 Interpreting the Evidence on Life Cycle Skill Formation. In: Hanushek EA, Welch F (editors). Handbook of the Economics of Education. Elsevier; 2006. pp. 697–812.
12. Cunha F, Heckman J. The Technology of Skill Formation. American Economic Review. 2007; 97(2): 31–47. doi: 10.1257/aer.97.2.31
13. Heckman JJ. Skill Formation and the Economics of Investing in Disadvantaged Children. Science. 2006; 312(5782): 1900–1902. doi: 10.1126/science.1128898
14. Cunha F, Heckman JJ, Schennach SM. Estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Econometrica. 2010; 78(3): 883–931. doi: 10.3982/ecta6551
15. Francesconi M, Heckman JJ. Child development and parental investment: Introduction. The Economic Journal. 2016; 126(596): F1–F27. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12388
16. Baumrind D. Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology. 1971; 4(1): 1–103. doi: 10.1037/h0030372
17. Maccoby EE, Martin JA. Socialization in the Context of the Family: Parent-Child Interactions. In: Mussen PH (editor). Handbook of child psychology. Wiley; 1983.
18. Doepke M, Zilibotti F. Parenting with style: Altruism and paternalism in intergenerational preference transmission. Econometrica. 2017; 85(5): 1331–1371. doi: 10.3982/ecta14634
19. Weinberg BA. An incentive model of the effect of parental income on children. Journal of Political Economy. 2001; 109(2): 266–280. doi: 10.1086/319556
20. Masud H, Thurasamy R, Ahmad MS. Parenting styles and academic achievement of young adolescents: A systematic literature review. Quality & Quantity. 2015; 49(6): 2411–2433. doi: 10.1007/s11135-014-0120-x
21. Sokol RL, Qin B, Poti JM. Parenting styles and body mass index: a systematic review of prospective studies among children. Obesity Reviews. 2017; 18(3): 281–292. doi: 10.1111/obr.12497
22. Cottle CC, Lee RJ, Heilbrun K. The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2001; 28(3): 367–394. doi: 10.1177/0093854801028003005
23. Del Boca D, Flinn C, Wiswall M. Household choices and child development. The Review of Economic Studies. 2014; 81(1): 137–185. doi: 10.1093/restud/rdt026
24. Nghiem HS, Nguyen HT, Khanam R, Connelly LB. Does school type affect cognitive and non-cognitive development in children? Evidence from Australian primary schools. Labour Economics. 2015; 33: 55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2015.02.009
25. Del Boca D, Monfardini C, Nicoletti C. Parental and child time investments and the cognitive development of adolescents. Journal of Labor Economics. 2017; 35(2): 565–608. doi: 10.1086/689479
26. Cai X, Fan Q, Yuan C. The impact of only child peers on students’ cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes. Labour Economics. 2022; 78: 102231. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102231
27. Li H, Li J, Lu Y, et al. Do housing regulations affect child development? Evidence and mechanisms. Journal of Public Economics. 2023; 227: 104995. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104995
28. Todd PE, Wolpin KI. The production of cognitive achievement in children: Home, school, and racial test score gaps. Journal of Human Capital. 2007; 1(1): 91–136. doi: 10.1086/526401
29. Cui Y, Liu H, Zhao L. Mother’s education and child development: Evidence from the compulsory school reform in China. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2019; 47(3): 669–692. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2019.04.001
30. Deuchert E, Felfe C. The tempest: Short- and long-term consequences of a natural disaster for children׳s development. European Economic Review. 2015; 80: 280–294. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.09.004
31. Cesarini D, Lindqvist E, Östling R, Wallace B. Wealth, Health, and Child Development: Evidence from Administrative Data on Swedish Lottery Players. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2016; 131(2): 687–738. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjw001
32. Felfe C, Lalive R. Does early child care affect children’s development? Journal of Public Economics. 2018; 159: 33–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.01.014
33. Zhang Y, Kang L, Zhao J, et al. Assessing the Inequality of Early Child Development in China—A Population-Based Study. The Lancet Regional Health—Western Pacific. 2021; 14: 100221. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100221
34. Schoenau E, Frost HM. The “Muscle-Bone Unit” in Children and Adolescents. Calcified Tissue International. 2002; 70(5): 405–407. doi: 10.1007/s00223-001-0048-8
35. Stodden DF, Goodway JD, Langendorfer SJ, et al. A Developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: An emergent relationship. Quest. 2008; 60(2): 290–306. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2008.10483582
36. Di Giacomo D, Ranieri J, Lacasa P. Digital learning as enhanced learning processing? cognitive evidence for new insight of smart learning. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017; 8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01329
37. Cristia J, Ibarrarán P, Cueto S, et al. Technology and child development: Evidence from the one laptop per child program. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2017; 9(3): 295–320. doi: 10.1257/app.20150385
38. Arabiat D, Al Jabery M, Robinson S, et al. Interactive technology use and child development: A systematic review. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2023; 49(4): 679–715. doi: 10.1111/cch.13082
39. Fairlie RW, Kalil A. The effects of computers on children’s social development and school participation: Evidence from a randomized control experiment. Economics of Education Review. 2017; 57: 10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.01.001
40. Barrot JS. Social media as a language learning environment: A systematic review of the literature (2008–2019). Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2021; 35(9): 2534–2562. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2021.1883673
41. Bochaver AA, Dokuka SV, Sivak EV, Smirnov IB. Internet use and depressive symptoms in adolescents: A review. Clinical Psychology and Special Education. 2019; 8(3): 1–18. doi: 10.17759/cpse.2019080301
42. Keles B, McCrae N, Grealish A. A systematic review: The influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. 2019; 25(1): 79–93. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851
43. Dorris C, Winter K, O’Hare L, et al. Educating the IGeneration: A systematic review of mobile device use in the primary school classroom and its impact on pupil literacy and numeracy attainment. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2021; 17(2). doi: 10.1002/cl2.1155
44. Bianchi N, Lu Y, Song H. The effect of computer-assisted learning on students’ long-term development. Journal of Development Economics. 2022; 158: 102919. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102919
45. Bulman G, Fairlie RW. Technology and education: Computers, software, and the internet. In: Handbook of the Economics of Education. Elsevier; 2016. pp. 239–280.
46. David D, Giannini C, Chiarelli F, Mohn A. Text neck syndrome in children and adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(4): 1565. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041565
47. Suggate SP, Martzog P. Children’s sensorimotor development in relation to screen-media usage: A two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2021; 74: 101279. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101279
48. Liu J, Riesch S, Tien J, et al. Screen media overuse and associated physical, cognitive, and emotional/behavioral outcomes in children and adolescents: An integrative review. Journal of Pediatric Health Care. 2022; 36(2): 99–109. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2021.06.003
49. Zembura M, Matusik P. Sarcopenic obesity in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2022; 13. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.914740
50. Jung HN, Jung CH, Hwang YC. Sarcopenia in youth. Metabolism. 2023; 144: 155557. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2023.155557
51. Mager DR, Hager A, Gilmour S. Challenges and physiological implications of sarcopenia in children and youth in health and disease. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care. 2023; 26(6): 528–533. doi: 10.1097/mco.0000000000000969
52. Proia P, Amato A, Drid P, et al. The impact of diet and physical activity on bone health in children and adolescents. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2021; 12. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.704647
53. Cavallo F, Mohn A, Chiarelli F, Giannini C. Evaluation of bone age in children: A mini-review. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2021; 9. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.580314
54. Abdel-aziem AA, Abdel-ghafar MAF, Ali OI, Abdelraouf OR. Effects of smartphone screen viewing duration and body position on head and neck posture in elementary school children. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2022; 35(1): 185–193. doi: 10.3233/bmr-200334
55. Salemink K, Strijker D, Bosworth G. Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies. 2017; 54: 360–371. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001
56. Chen JQ, Price V. Narrowing the digital divide. Education and Urban Society. 2006; 38(4): 398–405. doi: 10.1177/0013124506287910
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
