The integration of mobile technology in biomechanics education: Advancing knowledge and practice
Abstract
Advancements in mobile technology (MT) are revolutionizing biomechanics education by enhancing the understanding of motion, deformation, and forces within biological systems. This study investigates the integration of MT tools—specifically augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and gamified learning platforms—in biomechanics curricula, focusing on mechanobiology encompassing genes, proteins, cells, tissues, and organs. Utilizing a combination of literature synthesis and empirical data from two pilot studies involving 205 students, the research evaluates the effectiveness of these technologies in improving comprehension, engagement, and retention. The first pilot study with 120 undergraduate students demonstrated a 35% increase in comprehension scores through AR/VR tools compared to traditional textbook methods, while the second pilot study with 85 postgraduate students revealed a 20% improvement in knowledge retention and a 42% enhancement in spatial understanding of protein deformation processes via VR-based simulations and gamified platforms. These results highlight MT’s significant potential to transform biomechanics education by providing immersive, interactive, and personalized learning experiences. Additionally, the study addresses key challenges such as the high cost of AR/VR devices, the need for comprehensive educator training, and ensuring equitable access across diverse educational institutions, proposing strategies like developing cost-effective solutions and establishing standardized content frameworks. Overall, the findings affirm that integrating MT into biomechanics education advances pedagogical practices and aligns with the evolving demands of modern biomedical sciences, fostering a more engaging, effective, and accessible learning environment for both educational institutions and learners.
References
1. López-Moranchel I, Franco E, Urosa B, et al. University Students’ Experiences of the Use of Mlearning as a Training Resource for the Acquisition of Biomechanical Knowledge. Educ. Sci. 2021; 11(479).
2. ZhaoriGetu H, Li C. Innovation in physical education teaching based on biomechanics feedback: Design and evaluation of personalized training programs. Mol. Cell. Biomech. 2024; 21(2): 403.
3. Clark RA, Bryant AL, Pua Y, et al. Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance. Gait Posture. 2010; 31(3): 307–310.
4. Lockhart TE, Soangra R, Yoon H, et al. Prediction of fall risk among community-dwelling older adults using a wearable system. Sci. Rep. 2021; 11(1): 20531.
5. Kim S, Lockhart TE. The effects of 10% front load carriage on the likelihood of slips and falls. Ind. Health. 2008; 46(1): 32–39.
6. Shi W, Lockhart TE, Arbab M. Tinted windshield and its effects on aging drivers’ visual acuity and glare response. Safety Sci. 2008; 46(9): 1223–1233.
7. Soangra R, Lockhart TE, Frames CW, et al. Potential for using Smartphone Accelerometers in Non-laboratory Environments. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 2013; 57(1): 1680–1684.
8. Doshi KB, Moon SH, Whitaker MD, Lockhart TE. Assessment of gait and posture characteristics using a smartphone wearable system for persons with osteoporosis with and without falls. Sci. Rep. 2023; 13(1): 453.
9. Lockhart TE, Woldstad JC, Smith JL. Effects of age-related gait changes on the biomechanics of slips and falls. Ergonomics. 2003; 46(12): 1136–1160.
10. Lockhart TE. Thurmon E. Lockhart. Wikipedia. Updated 2023 Oct 10. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thurmon_E._Lockhart (accessed 15 Jan 2025).
11. Force platform. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_platform (accessed on 15 January 2025).
12. Knudson D. Physics and biomechanics education research: Improving learning of biomechanical concepts. 2013. Available from: https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/5525 (accessed 15 Jan 2025).
13. Bernacki ML, Greene JA, Crompton H. Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2020; 60: 101827.
14. Wang C, Chen X, Yu T, et al. Education reform and change driven by digital technology: A bibliometric study from a global perspective. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024; 11: 256.
15. Wang H, Xie Z, Lu L, et al. A mobile platform-based app to assist undergraduate learning of human kinematics in biomechanics courses. Journal of Biomechanics. 2022; 142: 111243.
16. Papadakis S, Kiv AE, Kravtsov H, et al. Revolutionizing education: using computer simulation and cloud-based smart technology to facilitate successful open learning. In: Proceedings of the 10th Illia O. Teplytskyi Workshop on Computer Simulation in Education, and Workshop on Cloud-based Smart Technologies for Open Education (CoSinEi and CSTOE 2022) co-located with ACNS Conference on Cloud and Immersive Technologies in Education (CITEd 2022); 22 December 2022; Kyiv, Ukraine. pp. 1–18.
17. Papadakis S, Kiv AE, Kravtsov HM, et al. Unlocking the power of synergy: The joint force of cloud technologies and augmented reality in education. In: Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (CTE 2021) and 5th International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education (AREdu 2022); 23 May 2022; Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
