Biomechanics of helmet mask structures in mitigating explosion-induced traumatic brain injury: A numerical simulation study

  • Xuan Ma School of Transportation Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China
  • Bin Yang School of Transportation Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China
  • Yang Zheng School of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
  • Feng Gao School of Transportation Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China
  • Ronghua Zhou Zhiwu Yunxiang (Nanjing) Information Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210031, China
  • Jiajia Zou School of Transportation Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China
  • Xingyu Zhang School of Transportation Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China
Keywords: explosive shock wave; helmet mask; aerogel; polycarbonate; protective effectiveness; numerical simulation
Article ID: 1398

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused by explosions is the most common injury suffered by front-line soldiers. However, research on protective gear has primarily been limited to different types of helmets or their internal padding systems. Aerogels, with their microporous structures and high acoustic impedance properties, can effectively buffer the impact of explosions and generate significant acoustic mismatches between adjacent layers, making them promising materials for reducing the damage of blast shock waves to the head. This study aims to enhance the performance of protective equipment in mitigating explosion-induced head injuries and proposes a novel helmet mask structure based on polycarbonate and aerogel laminated composites. The coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) method in Abaqus is employed to analyze the mechanical responses of different helmet-mask protective structures under blast shock waves through numerical simulation. The study emphasizes the influence of the type and thickness of the protective structure on head injury. Our findings indicate that a helmet with a face shield can significantly slow down the propagation of the blast wave to the face, thereby reducing craniocerebral injury. Further analysis reveals that the combination of polycarbonate and aerogel layers is more effective than a fully polycarbonate face shield in mitigating intracranial pressure (ICP) in the frontal and parietal regions. Additionally, masks with 3-layer configurations (featuring a single 0.6 mm thick aerogel layer) and 5-layer configurations (with double 0.6 mm thick aerogel layers) performed best in preventing moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). These results provide a scientific basis and a new direction for the design and optimization of future protective helmets.

Author Biographies

Bin Yang, School of Transportation Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China

南京理工学院交通工程学院,教授

Ronghua Zhou, Zhiwu Yunxiang (Nanjing) Information Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210031, China

智屋云翔(南京)信息技术有限公司

Jiajia Zou, School of Transportation Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China

南京理工学院交通工程学院,研究生

Xingyu Zhang, School of Transportation Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China

南京理工学院交通工程学院,研究生

References

1. Eynde JO, Yu AW, Eckersley CP, et al. Primary blast wave protection in combat helmet design: A historical comparison between present day and World War I. PLOS ONE. 2020; 15(2): e0228802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228802

2. Li Y, Lin J, Liu S, et al. Experimental and numerical study on the protective mechanism of the full helmet subjected to blast loadings. Thin-Walled Structures. 2024; 198: 111666. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2024.111666

3. Yang B, Sun H, Wang A, et al. A Study on the Finite Element Model for Head Injury in Facial Collision Accident. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics. 2020; 17(1): 49-62. doi: 10.32604/mcb.2019.07534

4. Tse KM, Holder D. A Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Airbag Bicycle Helmet Concept for Traumatic Brain Injury Mitigation. Bioengineering. 2021; 8(11): 173. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8110173

5. Huang X, Chang L, Zhao H, et al. Study on craniocerebral dynamics response and helmet protective performance under the blast waves. Materials & Design. 2022; 224: 111408. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111408

6. Liu ZL, Du ZB, Zhang JR, et al. Progress in the mechanism and protection of blast-induced traumatic brain injury. Explosion and Shock Waves. 2022; 42(4): 041101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0053

7. Kang Y, Zhang SZ, Zhang YP, et al. Research on anti-shock wave performance of the protective equipment for the head of a soldier based on shock tube evaluation. Explosion and Shock Waves. 2021; 41(8): 085901. doi: 10.11883/ bzycj-2020-0395

8. Valverde-Marcos B, Rubio I, Antona-Makoshi J, et al. Numerical Analysis of EOD Helmet under Blast Load Events Using Human Head Model. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(22): 8227. doi: 10.3390/app10228227

9. Zhang TG, Satapathy SS. Effect of Helmet Pads on the Load Transfer to Head Under Blast Loadings. Volume 3: Biomedical and Biotechnology Engineering. 2014. doi: 10.1115/imece2014-37143

10. Yang WU, Bin Q, Shu W, et al. Helmet protection based on explosive shock waves. Acta Armamentarii. 2022; 43(9): 8. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.0553

11. Rodríguez-Millán M, Tan LB, Tse KM, et al. Effect of full helmet systems on human head responses under blast loading. Materials & Design. 2017; 117: 58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.081

12. Nyein MK, Jason AM, Yu L, et al. In silico investigation of intracranial blast mitigation with relevance to military traumatic brain injury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010; 107(48): 20703-20708. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014786107

13. Courtney ED, Courtney AC, & Courtney MW. Blast wave transmission through transparent armour materials. Journal of Battlefield Technology. 2012.

14. Grujicic M, Ramaswami S, Snipes J, et al. RETRACTED: Potential improvement in helmet blast-protection via the use of a polyurea external coating: Combined experimental/computational analyses. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications. 2016; 234(3): 337-367. doi: 10.1177/1464420716644472

15. Nahum AM, Smith R, Ward CC. Intracranial Pressure Dynamics During Head Impact. SAE Technical Paper Series. 1977. doi: 10.4271/770922

16. Trosseille X, Tarriére C, Lavaste F, et al. Development of a F.E.M. of the Human Head According to a Specific Test Protocol. SAE Technical Paper Series. 1992. doi: 10.4271/922527

17. Hardy WN, Foster CD, Mason MJ, et al. Investigation of Head Injury Mechanisms Using Neutral Density Technology and High-Speed Biplanar X-ray. SAE Technical Paper Series. 2001. doi: 10.4271/2001-22-0016

18. Tse KM, Tan LB, Lee SJ, et al. Development and validation of two subject‐specific finite element models of human head against three cadaveric experiments. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering. 2013; 30(3): 397-415. doi: 10.1002/cnm.2609

19. Li Y, Fan H, Gao XL. Ballistic helmets: Recent advances in materials, protection mechanisms, performance, and head injury mitigation. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2022; 238: 109890. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109890

20. Rodriguez-Millan M, Rubio I, Burpo FJ, et al. Impact response of advance combat helmet pad systems. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2023; 181: 104757. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104757

21. Tan LB, Tse KM, Lee HP, & Tan VBC. Ballistic impact analysis on the advanced combat helmet (ACH) -testing and simulation. In: Proceedings of the 9th Composite Science and Technology (ICCST); 2013.

22. Ganpule S, Alai A, Plougonven E, et al. Mechanics of blast loading on the head models in the study of traumatic brain injury using experimental and computational approaches. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 2012; 12(3): 511-531. doi: 10.1007/s10237-012-0421-8

23. Huang X, Zheng Q, Chang L, et al. Study on protective performance and gradient optimization of helmet foam liner under bullet impact. Scientific Reports. 2022; 12(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20533-9

24. Dewey JM. The shape of the blast wave: studies of the Friedlander equation. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock: 1-9; October 3-8, 2010; Jerusalem, Israel.

25. Grujicic A, LaBerge M, Grujicic M, et al. Potential Improvements in Shock-Mitigation Efficacy of a Polyurea-Augmented Advanced Combat Helmet. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 2011; 21(8): 1562-1579. doi: 10.1007/s11665-011-0065-3

26. Zhang L, Makwana R, Sharma S. Comparison of the head response in blast insult with and without combat helmet. In: Proceedings of HFM-207 Symposium on a Survey of Blast Injury across the Full Landscape of Military Science NATO OTAN Research & Technology Organization: 1-18; 2011.

27. Tan LB, Lee HP, & Tan VBC. Performance evaluation and design improvement of interior cushioning system of ballistic helmets. Singapore: National University of Singapore, Report for the DSO National Laboratories, Defence Medical and Environmental Research Institute (DMERI); 2012.

28. Ward C, Chan M, Nahum A. Intracranial Pressure–A Brain Injury Criterion. SAE Technical Paper Series. 1980. doi: 10.4271/801304

29. McElhaney JH, Fogle JL, Melvin JW, et al. Mechanical properties of cranial bone. Journal of biomechanics. 1970; 3(5): 495-511. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(70)90059-X

Published
2025-02-28
How to Cite
Ma, X., Yang, B., Zheng, Y., Gao, F., Zhou, R., Zou, J., & Zhang, X. (2025). Biomechanics of helmet mask structures in mitigating explosion-induced traumatic brain injury: A numerical simulation study. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 22(4), 1398. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb1398
Section
Article