Application research of biomechanical principles in developing effective labor education programs
Abstract
This paper reviews biomechanical labor education and practice concepts with lasting health objectives for expectant mothers during childbirth. Some of the areas of concern highlighted are inadequacies of routine obstetric practice, lack of adequate training among healthcare givers, and lack of appropriate tools for assessment. The remedies recommended by the research study include developing a standard training package, financing biomechanical assessment technology, and encouraging professional interconnection among medical specialists. Such solutions are possible and realistic as they are based on current educational models and implemented technologies, focusing on applying researched methods. In incorporating biomechanics into maternity care, this study suggests better labor conditions and birth outcomes for mothers and babies.
References
1. Baracco A, Coggiola M, Bosio D, et al. Whole body biomechanical burden of healthcare workers: proposal for a complementary risk assessment and management tool (HOARA). La Medicina del Lavoro. 2019; 110(5): 372-388. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v110i5.7624
2. Lennon R. Bouncing your way to labour and birth using biomechanics and fetal optimal positioning. British Journal of Midwifery. 2024; 32(5): 226-232. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2024.32.5.226
3. Belmont R, Knudson D, Costa PHL da, et al. Meaningful learning of biomechanical concepts: an experience with physical education teachers in continuing education. Journal of Physical Education. 2021; 32(1). doi: 10.4025/jphyseduc.v32i1.3263
4. Innocenti B. Biomechanics: a fundamental tool with a long history (and even longer future!). Muscle Ligaments and Tendons Journal. 2019; 07(04): 491. doi: 10.32098/mltj.04.2017.02
5. Cui B, Wu H. Biomechanical analysis and teaching strategies of complex movements in physical education teaching. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics. 2024; 21(3): 478. doi: 10.62617/mcb478
6. Cui Z, Wang D. Physical education teaching: A biomechanical perspective of physical education educators and coaches. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics. 2024; 21(3): 611. doi: 10.62617/mcb611
7. Bathe C, Fennen L, Heering T, et al. Training interventions to reduce the risk of injury to the lower extremity joints during landing movements in adult athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine. 2023; 9(2): e001508. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001508
8. Salisu S, Ruhaiyem NIR, Eisa TAE, et al. Motion Capture Technologies for Ergonomics: A Systematic Literature Review. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(15): 2593. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152593
9. Desseauve D, Fradet L, Lacouture P, et al. Position for labor and birth: State of knowledge and biomechanical perspectives. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2017; 208: 46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.11.006
10. Forte P, Teixeira JE. Exercise Biomechanics for Health: Evaluating Lifelong Activities for Well-Being. Healthcare. 2023; 11(6): 900. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060900
11. Aljohani WA, Pascua GP. Impacts of Manual Handling Training and Lifting Devices on Risks of Back Pain among Nurses: An Integrative Literature Review. Nurse Media Journal of Nursing. 2019; 9(2): 210-230. doi: 10.14710/nmjn.v9i2.26435
12. Evans S, Sanders K. May the Force(s) be with You: The Utility of Using a Game-Based Approach to Teach Biomechanics. Strategies. 2024; 37(4): 8-17. doi: 10.1080/08924562.2024.2346477
13. Talmy L. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science. 1988; 12(1): 49-100. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
14. DiDomenico A, McGorry RW, Banks JJ. Effects of common working postures on balance control during the stabilisation phase of transitioning to standing. Ergonomics. 2011; 54(11): 1053-1059. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.615414
15. Tai WH, Zhang R, Zhao L. Cutting-Edge Research in Sports Biomechanics: From Basic Science to Applied Technology. Bioengineering. 2023; 10(6): 668. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10060668
16. Patrona F, Chatzitofis A, Zarpalas D, et al. Motion analysis: Action detection, recognition and evaluation based on motion capture data. Pattern Recognition. 2018; 76: 612-622. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.12.007
17. Rout BK, Sikdar BK. Hazard identification, risk assessment, and control measures as an effective tool of occupational health assessment of hazardous process in an iron ore pelletizing industry. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2017; 21(2): 56-76.
18. Sousa AD, Baixinho CL, Presado MH, et al. The Effect of Interventions on Preventing Musculoskeletal Injuries Related to Nurses Work: Systematic Review. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2023; 13(2): 185. doi: 10.3390/jpm13020185
19. Shah R, Gillen AL. A systematic literature review of university-industry partnerships in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2023; 49(3): 577-603. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2023.2253741
20. Guelmami N, Ezzeddine LB, Hatem G, et al. The Ethical Compass: Establishing ethical guidelines for research practices in sports medicine and exercise science. International Journal of Sport Studies for Health. 2024; 7(2): 31-46. doi: 10.61838/kman.intjssh.7.2.4
21. Hofmeyr GJ, Singata-Madliki M. The second stage of labor. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020; 67: 53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.03.012
22. Papoutsis D, Antonakou A. Normal childbirth: The natural, non-medical, alternative approaches to the most common medical interventions in labor. European Journal of Midwifery. 2023; 7(December): 1-3. doi: 10.18332/ejm/174525
23. Zhang LL, Luo ZF, Yang GJ. A Randomized Controlled Comparative Study of the Three Over-Bed Techniques for Positioning and Repositioning the Lithotomy Position While Using Stirrups. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2023; 16: 4255-4264. doi: 10.2147/jmdh.s435570
24. O’Brien M. Teaching midwives about physiology-based care: going beyond the core curriculum. AIMS Journal. 2023; 35(1).
25. Feltovich H. Labour and delivery: a clinician’s perspective on a biomechanics problem. Interface Focus. 2019; 9(5): 20190032. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2019.0032
26. Lien KC, DeLancey JOL, Ashton-Miller JA. Biomechanical Analyses of the Efficacy of Patterns of Maternal Effort on Second-Stage Progress. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2009; 113(4): 873-880. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31819c82e1
27. Desseauve D, Pierre F, Fernandez A, et al. Assessment of Pelvic-Lumbar-Thigh Biomechanics to Optimize The Childbirth Position: An “In Vivo” Innovative Biomechanical Study. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52338-8
28. Topalidou A. Biomechanics of childbirth. British Journal Of Midwifery. 2024. 32(8).
29. Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JOL. On the Biomechanics of Vaginal Birth and Common Sequelae. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2009; 11(1): 163-176. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-061008-124823
30. URI study explores biomechanics during pregnancy to improve prenatal care, reduce maternal deaths. Available online: https://www.uri.edu/news/2023/06/uri-study-explores-biomechanics-during-pregnancy-to-improve-prenatal-care-reduce-maternal-deaths/ (accessed on 2 January 2025).
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
