Biomechanical analysis helps innovation and application of ideological and political teaching model of SPOC flipped classroom for biopharmaceutical majors in universities
Abstract
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence and modern educational technology, the traditional classroom teaching model can no longer meet the requirements of today’s higher education for the comprehensive quality training of students. Especially in interdisciplinary majors such as biopharmaceuticals, relying solely on traditional teaching methods is no longer sufficient to improve students’ professional ability and social responsibility effectively. In this context, the deep integration of ideological and political education with professional course teaching has become an important issue in education reform. In response to this demand, this paper proposes a teaching model that combines the SPOC (Small Private Online Course) platform with the flipped classroom, aiming to enhance student’s learning interest, professional ability, and social responsibility through the combination of online self-learning and classroom interactive discussion. This study selected 40 biopharmaceutical students from Wuhan East Lake University as the research subjects and used the literature data method, questionnaire survey method, teaching experiment method, and classroom observation method to comprehensively explore the application effect of the teaching model based on the combination of the SPOC platform and the flipped classroom in the ideological and political education of biopharmaceutical majors. The results show that 90% of the students support this model, believing that it can effectively stimulate learning enthusiasm and help students better understand the core knowledge of the major, especially in the fields of drug development, molecular biology, and bioengineering, and enhance the penetration of ideological and political education.
References
1. Culver J. Interactive Environmental Microbiology Teaching Based on Multimedia Technology. Academic Journal of Environmental Biology. 2020; 1(3): 28–35.
2. DeRuisseau LR. The flipped classroom allows for more class time devoted to critical thinking. Advances in Physiology Education. 2016; 40(4): 522–528.
3. Asiksoy G, Özdamlı F. Flipped Classroom adapted to the ARCS Model of Motivation and applied to a Physics Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2016; 12(6): 1589–1603.
4. Cotta KI, Shah S, Almgren MM, et al. Effectiveness of flipped classroom instructional model in teaching pharmaceutical calculations. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning. 2016; 8(5): 646–653.
5. Jovanovic J, Gasevic D, Dawson S, et al. Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. Internet & Higher Education. 2017; 33(4): 74–85.
6. Heyborne W, Perrett J. To Flip or Not to Flip? Analysis of a Flipped Classroom Pedagogy in a General Biology Course. Journal of College Science Teaching. 2016; 45(4): 31–37.
7. Finardi KR, Prebianca GVV, Schmitt J. English distance learning: Possibilities and limitations of MEO for the Flipped Classroom. Revista Brasilra De Lingstica Aplicada. 2016; 16(2): 181–208.
8. Boevé AJ, Meijer RR, Bosker RJ, et al. Implementing the flipped classroom: An exploration of study behavior and student performance. Higher Education. 2016; 74(6): 1015–1032.
9. Mohamed H, Lamia M. Implementing flipped classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system into the learning process. Computers & Education. 2018; 124(9): 62–76.
10. Petition RJ, Mcneil WS. Student Experiences of Emergency Remote Teaching: Impacts of Instructor Practice on Student Learning, Engagement, and Well-Being. Journal of Chemical Education. 2020; 97(9): 2486–2493.
11. Yuan Y, Wu G. Potentials and problems of teaching design thinking as massive open online courses in the Chinese context. SN Social Sciences. 2021; 1(6): 1–27.
12. Ström P, Kartasalo K, Olsson H, et al. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: A population-based, diagnostic study. The Lancet Oncology. 2020; 21(2): 222–232.
13. Cano JR, Aljohani NR, Abbasi RA, et al. Prototype selection to improve monotonic nearest neighbor. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2017; 60: 128–135.
14. Morrison DM, Miller KB. Teaching and Learning in the Pleistocene: A Biocultural Account of Human Pedagogy and Its Implications for AIED. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2017; 28(2): 1–31.
15. Bourouis MA, Zadjaoui A, Djedid A. Contribution of two artificial intelligence techniques in predicting the secondary compression index of fine-grained soils. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. 2020; 5(3): 1–11.
16. Ong J, Selvam A, Chhablani J. Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: Optimization of machine learning for ophthalmic care and research. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2021; 49(5): 413–415.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
