Application of biomechanics in construction engineering management: Exploration of improving economic efficiency and sustainability
Abstract
This article explores the use of biomechanical principles in construction project management to enhance building sustainability and economic benefits. By incorporating biomechanical adaptability and real-time scheduling, architectural design and operation are optimized. The framework uses dynamic simulations and optimization algorithms to improve performance across building stages, maximizing resource conservation and economic gains. The algorithm optimizes building structure performance under external loads like wind, earthquakes, and temperature changes. Experimental results show significant energy efficiency improvements (e.g., 11.54% for temperature changes) and material savings (up to 10% for public buildings). This study offers an intelligent optimization solution, advancing the construction industry towards sustainability through biomechanical models and optimization algorithms.
References
1. Mahrous AM, Dewidar KM, Rifat MM, Nessim AA. Biophilia as a Sustainable Design Approach for University Buildings Design: A case study in university campus drawing studios Cairo, Egypt. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022; 1113.
2. Vitalis L, Chayaamor-Heil N. Forcing biological sciences into architectural design: On conceptual confusions in the field of biomimetic architecture. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2021; 11(2): 179–190.
3. Agyemang C, Kinateder M. A Review of the Biomechanics of Staircase Descent: Implications for Building Fire Evacuations. Fire Technolog. 2021; 58: 379–413.
4. Lu K, Sun X, Xu L, et al. Self-monitored biological nanoheaters operating in the first biological window based on single-band red upconversion nanoparticles fabricated through architectural design. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2020; 842: 155602.
5. Chayaamor-Heil N, Louis V. Biology and architecture: An ongoing hybridization of scientific knowledge and design practice by six architectural offices in France. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2020; 10(2): 240–262.
6. Strunge JW. Enabling regenerative building design through biohacking. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020; 588.
7. Imani N, Vale B. A framework for finding inspiration in nature: Biomimetic energy efficient building design. Energy & Buildings. 2020; 255: 110296.
8. González OM, Andrés GPM, Lun BZH, Saray ABN. Mechanical Efficiency and Biomechanical Performance of Innovative Sandwich-Like Composite Wall Biopanels-A Structural Alternative for Constructions in High-Risk Seismic and Windy Regions. Solid State Phenomena. 2020; 304.
9. Le CTP. Fractal geometry and applicability to biological simulation shapes for sustainable architecture design in Vietnam. Ecology. Environment & Conservation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021; 24(4).
10. Makram A. Nature-based framework for sustainable architectural design-biomimetic design and biophilic design. Architecture Research. 2019; 9(3): 74–81.
11. Ney FP, Malco DCL, Senoro DB, Catajay-Mani M. The bio-mechanical properties of coco wood applied with Neem extracts: a potential preservative for sustainable building in Marinduque, Philippines. Sustainable Environment Research. 2019; 29(1).
12. Yen L. Building Designer Rna Nano-Structures for Synthetic Biology Applications. U.S. Patent 16/348,445, 10 November 2017.
13. Lauzet N, Mauree D, Colinart T, et al. Bioclimatic building design considering urban microclimate. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019; 1343: 012021.
14. Pajek L, Tekavec J, Drešček U, et al. Bioclimatic potential of European locations: GIS supported study of proposed passive building design strategies. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019; 296: 012008.
15. Yu Y, Li H, Umer W, et al. Automatic Biomechanical Workload Estimation for Construction Workers by Computer Vision and Smart Insoles. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 2019; 33(3).
16. Jackson JA, Olsson D, Burdorf A, et al. Occupational biomechanical risk factors for radial nerve entrapment in a 13-year prospective study among male construction workers. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2019; 76(5): 326–331.
17. Antwi-Afari MF, Li H. Fall risk assessment of construction workers based on biomechanical gait stability parameters using wearable insole pressure system. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2018; 38: 683–694.
18. Kong Liu, Li H, Yu Y, et al. Quantifying the physical intensity of construction workers, a mechanical energy approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2018; 38: 404–419.
19. Jennie AJ, Olsson D, Punnett L, et al. Occupational biomechanical risk factors for surgically treated ulnar nerve entrapment in a prospective study of male construction workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2019; 45(1): 63–72.
20. Pizarro MD, Mamprin ME, Damián LD, et al. Experimental bio-artificial liver: Importance of the architectural design on ammonia detoxification performance. World Journal of Hepatology. 2018; 10(10): 719–73.
21. Li X. Structural Reinforcement Technology of Architectural Engineering Construction Based on Biomechanics[J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED OXIDATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 21(2):1.
22. Kayıhan KS. Guney SO, Unal FC. Biophilia as the Main Design Question in the Architectural Design Studio Teaching. MEGARON / Yıldız Technical University Faculty of Architecture E-Journal. 2018; 13(1).
23. Kembel SW, Meadow JF, O’Connor TK, et al. Architectural design drives the biogeography of indoor bacterial communities. PLoS ONE. 2019; 9(1): e87093.
24. Antwi-Afari MF, Li H, Edwards DJ, et al. Biomechanical analysis of risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders during repetitive lifting task in construction workers. Journal of Technology & Science. 2017; 38: 41–47.
25. Nuh MZ, Nasir NF. Superstructure-based Design and Optimization of Batch Biodiesel Production Using Heterogeneous Catalysts. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2017; 226: 012001.
26. Diermeier S, Iberl J, Vetter K, et al. Early signs of architectural and biomechanical failure in isolated myofibers and immortalized myoblasts from desmin-mutant knock-in mice. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7(1): 1391.
27. Lee BY, Yoon SD, Lee SA, et al. Biomechanical Parameters in Arch Building Gait Measured by Gait Analysis System with Pressure Sensor. The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016; 34: 36–42.
28. Lee B, Yoo SD, Lee SA, et al. Biomechanical Parameters in Arch Building Gait Measured by Gait Analysis System with Pressure Sensor. The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016; 34: 195.
29. Omer A. Energy Efficient Design of New Building except New Low-Rise Residential Buildings: Cleaner and Greener Technologies, Sustainable Development and the Environment. Scientific Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2016.
30. Golabchi A, Han SH, Seo O, et al. An Automated Biomechanical Simulation Approach to Ergonomic Job Analysis for Workplace Design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2015; 141(8).
31. Xu J, Kim JH, Hong K, Koo J. A systematic approach for energy efficient building design factors optimization. Energy & Buildings. 2015; 89: 87–96.
32. Lu J, Wu X, Yan X, Zhang X. Model Simulation of Power Saving and Heat Saving in Intelligent Building Energy Saving Design. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014; 716–717: 470–473.
33. Wang Y, Yu X, Zhang Li. Application on Green Building Energy Design Evaluation Based on Support Vector Machine Model. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014; 716–717: 276–279.
34. Li N. Study on the Energy-Saving Design of Underground Building. Advanced Materials Research. 2014; 1065–1069: 2205–2208.
35. Zhang ZR, Xie F, Lin YL, Cai Q. The Study on Design Solution for Energy Efficiency of Existing Residential Building (EEERB) to Realize the 4th Energy Efficiency Target. Advanced Materials Research. 2014; 1044–1045: 664–667.
36. Lai X, Du Z, Zhang Z. Energy Saving Design of a Training Center in Dongguan. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014; 580–583: 2461–2465.
37. Zhang M. Application of BIM Technology on Energy Efficiency Building Design. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014; 587–589: 283–286.
38. Wu S, Kang G, Wang S, Lian J. Feasibility Analysis of Applying Biomechanical Properties of Human Body to Seismic Design of Building Structure. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014; 580–583: 1511–1514.
39. Han F. The Building Energy Conservation Design Responses of Urban Underground Space. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014; 507: 138–143.
40. Zorrilla Muñoz V, Montero Puertas I, Lorente Moreno R, et al. Epidemiological approach about biomechanical risk factors for mechanical installations in buildings. Ciencia & trabajo. 2013; 15(46): 24–30.
41. Sui Q, Wang C. Analysis of the Application of Double Envelope Enclosure in the Energy-Saving Design of High-Rise Buildings. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2013; 361–363: 352–356.
42. Li J. The Application Research of the Chinese Traditional Houses in Modern Building Energy Efficiency Design. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2013; 448–453: 1273–1277.
43. Danielson DT. Energy Efficiency Design Standards for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings. Department of Energy (DOE); 2013.
44. Zr DL, Mochtar S. Application of Bioclimatic Parameter as Sustainability Approach on Multi-story Building Design in Tropical Area. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2013; 17: 822–830.
45. Nute K. Architectural Creation Myths: The Biological Analogies Underlying Three Contemporary Building Design Traditions. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review. 2012; 24(1): 55.
46. Chen M, Pang M, Fang H. Optimization of Public Building Energy Design Schemes Base on the Minimizing of Operating Energy Consumption. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2012; 193–194: 21–25.
47. Buratti G, Dellera L, Santini M, Mosconi G. Biomechanical overload of the upper limbs and energy expenditure in bricklayers activity. Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia. 2012; 34(3): 72–75.
48. Kembel SW, Evan J, Kline J, et al. Architectural design influences the diversity and structure of the built environment microbiome. The ISME Journal. 2012; 6: 1469–1479.
49. Li X, Yan Z. Energy-Saving Design of Rural Residential Building in Cold Region. Advanced Materials Research. 2012; 512–515: 2740–2743.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
