Biomechanical and biodegradation performance of CSA-CSF reinforced cementitious composites: A bio-inspired approach

  • Bo Peng Suihua University, Suihua City 152000, China; Philosophy in Civil Engineering, Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur 43000, Malaysia
  • Haoyu Li Suihua University, Suihua City 152000, China
  • Yan Xu Suihua University, Suihua City 152000, China
  • Hanyu Li Suihua University, Suihua City 152000, China
Keywords: Corn Straw Ash (CSA); Corn Straw Fiber (CSF); biomechanics; biodegradation; dynamic loading; microstructural analysis; bio-inspired materials; sustainability; tissue engineering scaffolds
Article ID: 1317

Abstract

This study investigates the mechanical, biodegradation, and microstructural performance of cementitious composites reinforced with Corn Straw Ash (CSA) and Corn Straw Fiber (CSF) for applications in bio-inspired materials and sustainable engineering. CSA, a pozzolanic material, enhances matrix densification, while CSF provides crack-bridging and toughness improvement. Dynamic mechanical testing under cyclic loading demonstrated that CSA-CSF composites exhibit superior fatigue resistance, retaining 85% of their initial compressive strength after 1000 cycles. Biodegradation studies in simulated body fluid (SBF) and acidic environments revealed that the composites maintain 75% compressive strength in SBF over 28 days, highlighting their potential for bioactive scaffolds. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and quantitative porosity analysis showed that CSA-derived Calcium Silicate Hydrate (C-S-H) gel effectively filled voids, while CSF enhanced fiber-matrix bonding, mimicking the hierarchical structure of biological systems. The results emphasize the dual benefits of CSA-CSF composites in dynamic environments and their alignment with sustainable and bio-inspired design principles. This research provides insights into the development of materials for biomechanical applications, including tissue engineering scaffolds and earthquake-resistant structures.

References

1. Miller SA, Habert G, Myers RJ, Harvey JT. Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions in the cement industry via value chain mitigation strategies. One Earth. 2021; 4(10): 1398–1411. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.011

2. Sbahieh S, Zaher Serdar M, Al-Ghamdi SG. Decarbonization strategies of building materials used in the construction industry. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.346

3. Nie S, Zhou J, Yang F, et al. Analysis of theoretical carbon dioxide emissions from cement production: Methodology and application. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022; 334: 130270. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130270

4. Ige OE, Olanrewaju OA, Duffy KJ, Obiora C. A review of the effectiveness of Life Cycle Assessment for gauging environmental impacts from cement production. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 324: 129213. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129213

5. Etim MA, Babaremu K, Lazarus J, Omole D. Health risk and environmental assessment of cement production in Nigeria. Atmosphere. 2021; 12(9): 1111. doi: 10.3390/atmos12091111

6. Griffiths S, Sovacool BK, Del Rio DDF, et al. Decarbonizing the cement and concrete industry: A systematic review of socio-technical systems, technological innovations, and policy options. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2023; 180: 113291. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113291

7. Singh A, Yadav BP. Sustainable innovations and future prospects in construction material: a review on natural fiber-reinforced cement composites. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2024; 31(54): 62549–62587. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-35236-z

8. Phiri R, Rangappa SM, Siengchin S, et al. Development of sustainable biopolymer-based composites for lightweight applications from agricultural waste biomass: A review. Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research. 2023; 6(4): 436–450. doi: 10.1016/j.aiepr.2023.04.004

9. Wei G, Zhang J, Usuelli M, et al. Biomass vs inorganic and plastic-based aerogels: Structural design, functional tailoring, resource-efficient applications and sustainability analysis. Progress in Materials Science. 2022; 125: 100915. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100915

10. Oliveira, Ferreira de M. Produção e caracterização de cinzas pozolânicas a partir da biomassa da casca do coco verde [Master’s thesis]. Universidade Federal do Amazonas; 2021.

11. Wen L, Yan C, Shi Y, Wang Z. Mechanical and thermophysical properties of concrete with straw fiber and straw ash. BioResources. 2024; 19(4): 8007–8019. doi: 10.15376/biores.19.4.8007-8019

12. He J, Sun C, Wang X. Mechanical Properties and Microanalytical Study of Concrete Reinforced with Blended Corn Straw and Scrap Steel Fibers. Materials. 2024; 17(15): 3844. doi: 10.3390/ma17153844

13. Li J, Kasal B. Degradation Mechanism of the Wood-Cell Wall Surface in a Cement Environment Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2023; 35(7). doi: 10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-14910

14. Ritchie RO, Buehler MJ, Hansma P. Plasticity and toughness in bone. Physics Today. 2009; 62(6): 41–47. doi: 10.1063/1.3156332

15. Naleway SE, Porter MM, McKittrick J. Structural design elements in biological materials: Applications to bioinspired composites. Nature Reviews Materials. 2020; 5(8): 593–605.

16. Wegst UGK, Ashby MF. The mechanical efficiency of natural materials. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2021; 18(185): 20200538.

17. Zhang Z, Wang S, Wang J. Bioinspired hierarchical composites with high strength and toughness: Design strategies and applications. Advanced Materials. 2022; 34(20): 2200142.

18. Nair AK, Gautieri A, Chang SW, Buehler MJ. Molecular mechanics of mineralized collagen fibrils in bone. Nature Communications. 2013; 4(1): 1724. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2720

19. Abdelrahman M. On static and dynamic stability of bio-inspired composite structures with helicoidal schemes. Acta Mechanica. 2024; 235(1): 164.

20. Gupta S, Sharma R. Biodegradable Composites for Temporary Structures in Construction: Environmental and Functional Advantages. Journal of Sustainable Materials. 2023; 12(5): 567–576.

21. Wang X, Li Y. Applications of Biodegradable Cementitious Composites in Temporary Construction and Disaster Relief. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology. 2022; 20(4): 210–222.

22. Smith JA, Patel M. Biodegradable Temporary Structures for Green Construction: A Review. Construction and Building Materials. 2021; 287: 123019.

23. Gharaei R, Tronci G, Goswami P, et al. Biomimetic peptide enriched nonwoven scaffolds promote calcium phosphate mineralisation. RSC Advances. 2020; 10(47): 28332–28342. doi: 10.1039/d0ra02446e

24. Russias J, Saiz E, Deville S, et al. Fabrication and in vitro characterization of three-dimensional organic/inorganic scaffolds by robocasting. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007; 83(2): 435–445.

25. De Lima CPF, Cordeiro G. Evaluation of corn straw ash as supplementary cementitious material: Effect of acid leaching on its pozzolanic activity. Cement. 2021; 4: 18–30.

26. Memon SA, Khan S. A review on different processing methods to improve pozzolanic activity of agricultural wastes for sustainable construction materials. In: Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials. Springer; 2021. pp. 345–360.

27. Wahab RKA, Hassan M, Deifalla A. Influence of pozzolanic material in cement concrete mixes containing cement kiln dust. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Humanity (ICATH’2023); 25–26 December 2023; Rabat, Morocco. pp. 123–134.

Published
2025-01-16
How to Cite
Peng, B., Li , H., Xu, Y., & Li, H. (2025). Biomechanical and biodegradation performance of CSA-CSF reinforced cementitious composites: A bio-inspired approach. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 22(2), 1317. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb1317
Section
Article