Design of a computer-assisted physical education teaching platform based on the human-ground impact force dynamic model

  • Hang Zhao School of Sports Science, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China
  • Weiwei Liu Graduate School, Harbin Sport University, Harbin 150006, China
Keywords: computer aided; physical model; physical education; teaching platform; biomechanical characteristics
Article ID: 1292

Abstract

The auxiliary teaching platform of physical education is becoming more and more important in college physical education, and it has become an ideal tool to promote the interaction between teachers and students and improve the teaching effect. Compared with the traditional physical education teaching mode, the platform has stronger interaction, efficient information sharing function and rich and varied multimedia display. However, there are still some shortcomings in the application of biomechanics in the online sports teaching platform. In this study, a computer-aided physical education teaching platform based on the dynamic model of human body-ground impact force is proposed. The study aims at analyzing the mechanical characteristics of human body in contact with the ground during exercise from the perspective of biomechanics, and helping teachers and students to choose sports equipment more accurately according to different course contents and biomechanical needs. By introducing the biomechanical model, the platform can simulate and analyze the key biomechanical data such as impact force, change of center of gravity, joint stress and so on, and provide quantitative feedback for students to optimize the effect of sports training. At the same time, the platform also integrates a variety of functional modules, such as sports resource information module and real-time sports evaluation module. It greatly enriches students’ learning resources, prolongs the time and space of self-directed learning, promotes the transformation of learning methods, and improves students’ autonomy, learning enthusiasm and sports performance. With the help of this platform, students can access rich learning resources including high-quality biomechanical analysis videos, interactive sports simulation, detailed theoretical explanation and real-time online evaluation system to comprehensively improve their sports literacy and sports performance.

References

1. Silva DAS, Chaput JP, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. Physical education classes, physical activity, and sedentary behavior in children. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2018; 50(5): 995–1004. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001524

2. Bull C. Sports tourism destination resource analysis. Sport tourism destinations. 2005; 27(5): 25–38.

3. Kashuba V, Kolos M, Rudnytskyi O, et al. Modern approaches to improving the body constitution of female students within physical education classes. Journal of physical education and sport. 2017; 17(4): 2472–2476. doi: 10.7752/jpes.2017.04277

4. Papaioannou A. Students’ perceptions of the physical education class environment for boys and girls and the perceived motivational climate. Research Quarterly for exercise and sport. 1998; 69(3): 267–275. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1998.10607693

5. Solmon MA, Boone J. The impact of student goal orientation in physical education classes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1993; 64(4): 418–424. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1993.10607595

6. Azzarito L, Solomon MA. A reconceptualization of physical education: The intersection of gender/race/social class. Sport, Education and Society. 2005; 10(1): 25–47. doi: 10.1080/135733205200028794

7. Shi X, Li X, Wu Y. The Application of computer-aided teaching and mobile Internet terminal in college physical education. Computer-Aided Design. 2021; 18(23): 163–174. doi: 10.14733/cadaps.2021.S4.163-174

8. Shi Y, Zhao Z. Computer-aided software development and application in physical education in colleges and universities. Computer-Aided Design & Applications. 2021; 19(6): 59–69. doi: 10.14733/cadaps.2022.S1.59-69

9. Hu Y. Realization of intelligent computer aided system in physical education and training. Computer-Aided Design and Applications. 2020; 18(2): 80–91. doi: 10.14733/cadaps.2021.S2.80-91

10. Trudeau F, Shephard RJ. Physical education, school physical activity, school sports and academic performance. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2008; 5: 1–12. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-10

11. Zhao Z, Yang J. Design and implementation of computer aided physical education platform based on browser/server architecture. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2019; 14(15). doi: 10.3991/ijet.v14i15.11146

12. Wright PM, Burton S. Implementation and outcomes of a responsibility-based physical activity program integrated into an intact high school physical education class. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2008; 27(2): 138–154. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.27.2.138

13. Shen C, Tan Y. Effect evaluation model of computer aided physical education teaching and training based on artificial intelligence. Computer-Aided Design and Applications. 2023; 20(S5): 106–115. doi: 10.14733/cadaps.2023.S5.106-115

14. Ugwu EI, Ezeaku MN, Attah BI, et al. Application of computer aided design (CAD) and flat techniques in teaching pattern drafting by clothing lecturers in universities in South East, Nigeria. International Journal of Home Economics, Hospitality and Allied Research. 2023; 2(1): 29–43. doi: 10.57012/ijhhr.v2n1.003

15. Charulatha G, Dineskkumar R, Kaleeswari B, Lakshmipriya K. Computer-Aided design for skin disease identification and categorization using image processing. Journal of Science, Computing and Engineering Research. 2023; 6(4): 24–28. doi: 10.46379/jscer.2023.060407

16. Wu G, Zhang X. Realization of wireless sensors and intelligent computer aided teaching in physical education and training. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. 2022. doi: 10.1155/2022/6415352

17. Aimukhambet Z, Aituganova S, Alimbayev A, et al. The effects of computer aided education in the education of folk cultural products. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research. 2023; 5(2): 167–185. doi: 10.46303/jcsr.2023.25

18. Hachem LD, Zhu M, Aarabi B, et al. A practical classification system for acute cervical spinal cord injury based on a three-phased modified delphi process from the aospine spinal cord injury knowledge forum. Global Spine Journal. 2024; 14(2): 535–545. doi: 10.1177/21925682221114

19. Kibirige I, Odora J. Pre-service teachers’ use and usefulness of blackboard learning management systems for self-regulated learning. Journal of Education Technology. 2023; 7(2). doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i2.52194

20. Colquitt G, Pritchard T, Johnson C, McCollum S. Differentiating instruction in physical education: Personalization of learning. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2017; 88(7): 44–50. doi: 10.1080/07303084.2017.1340205

21. Zhang W, Wang Q, Xu Z, et al. Development of a tractor operator-operation environment coupled biomechanical model and analysis of lower limb muscle fatigue. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2023; 93: 103407. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103407

22. Calvache C, Solaque L, Velasco A, et al. Biomechanical models to represent vocal physiology: A systematic review. Journal of Voice. 2023; 37(3): 465.e1–465.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.02.014

23. Cen X, Song Y, Sun D, et al. Applications of finite element modeling in biomechanical analysis of foot arch deformation: a scoping review. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2023; 145(7): 070801.doi: 0.1115/1.4062311

24. Hou Z, Liu Q, Zhao H, et al. Biomechanical modeling and experiments of energy harvesting backpacks. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2023; 200: 110612. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110612

25. Haraguchi N, Hase K. Prediction of ground reaction forces and moments and joint kinematics and kinetics by inertial measurement units using 3D forward dynamics model. Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering. 2024; 19(1). doi: 10.1299/jbse.23-00130

26. Aux JD, Castillo B, Marulanda J, et al. Modelling human-structure interaction in pedestrian bridges using a three-dimensional biomechanical approach. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(16): 7257. doi: 10.3390/app14167257

27. Wang H, Swore J, Sharma S, et al. A complete biomechanical model of Hydra contractile behaviors, from neural drive to muscle to movement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023; 120(11): e2210439120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210439120

28. Gupta S, Chanda A. Biomechanical modeling of footwear-fluid-floor interaction during slips. Journal of Biomechanics. 2023; 156: 111690. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111690

29. Mathieu E, Crémoux S, Duvivier D, et al. Biomechanical modeling for the estimation of muscle forces: toward a common language in biomechanics, medical engineering, and neurosciences. Journal of Neuro Engineering and Rehabilitation. 2023; 20(1): 130.

30. Koshio T, Haraguchi N, Takahashi T, et al. Estimation of ground reaction forces during sports movements by sensor fusion from inertial measurement units with 3D forward dynamics model. Sensors. 2024; 24(9): 2706. doi: 10.3390/s24092706

31. Saraiva L, da Silva MR, Marques F, et al. A review on foot-ground contact modeling strategies for human motion analysis. Mechanism and Machine Theory. 2022; 177(1): 105046. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.105046

32. Daroudi S, Arjmand N, Mohseni M, et al. Evaluation of ground reaction forces and centers of pressure predicted by AnyBody Modeling System during load reaching/handling activities and effects of the prediction errors on model-estimated spinal loads. Journal of Biomechanics. 2024; 164(1): 111974. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111974

33. Ripic Z, Kuenze C, Andersen MS, et al. Ground reaction force and joint moment estimation during gait using an Azure Kinect-driven musculoskeletal modeling approach. Gait & posture. 2022; 95: 49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.04.005

34. Gao X, Wang L, Jiang L, et al. A novel rigid Foot-Ground contact model for Predicting ground reaction forces and center of pressure during normal gait. Journal of Biomechanics. 2024; 176: 112383. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112383

35. Gonabadi AM, Fallahtafti F, Pipinos II, Myers SA. Predicting lower body joint moments and electromyography signals using ground reaction forces during walking and running: An artificial neural network approach. Gait & Posture. 2025; 117(1): 323–331. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.014

Published
2025-03-07
How to Cite
Zhao, H., & Liu, W. (2025). Design of a computer-assisted physical education teaching platform based on the human-ground impact force dynamic model. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 22(4), 1292. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb1292
Section
Article