Innovative design and implementation path of biomechanical elements in intelligent landscapes

  • Delin Zeng School of Architecture & Design, Chongqing College of Humanities, Science & Technology, Chongqing 401524, China
Keywords: intelligent landscape; biomechanics; innovative design; implementation path; ecological adaptability; intelligent control system
Article ID: 1277

Abstract

With the acceleration of urbanization and rapid development of intelligent technologies, incorporating biomechanical elements into intelligent landscape design has become a crucial approach to enhancing urban landscape quality. This research conducts a systematic study on the innovative design and implementation approaches of biomechanical elements in intelligent landscapes, proposing a “Bio-Intelligence-Environment” trinity design principle system and developing new intelligent composite materials and biomimetic multi-level structural design methods. Experimental testing demonstrates that the developed intelligent composite materials achieve a tensile strength of 576 MPa, a 32.5% improvement over traditional materials, with intelligent response sensitivity increased by 45.3%. Through biomimetic multi-level structural design, component weight is reduced by 18.5% while bearing capacity increases by 22.3%, achieving a static load capacity of 2850 N/m2. The intelligent control system reaches a recognition accuracy of 98.7%, an improvement of 15.4 percentage points over traditional systems, with control precision reaching ± 0.08 mm. Environmental adaptability tests show that the system maintains stable operation within a temperature range of −25 ℃ to 65 ℃, with performance degradation not exceeding 5.8%, and relative humidity adaptation ranging from 20% to 95%. Field application data indicates a system stability rate of 99.3%, with an average fault-free operation time of 8500 h and annual operation and maintenance costs accounting for 3.2% of initial investment, a 45% reduction compared to traditional systems. User experience evaluation shows an overall satisfaction score of 92.3, with intelligent interaction satisfaction reaching 95.2%. Economic benefit analysis reveals that mass production reduces single system cost to 325,000 yuan, with a 2.8-year investment recovery period and an internal rate of return of 24.5%.

References

1. Du S. Research on Intelligent Landscape Design of Urban Public Space Based on User Needs (Chinese). Urban Construction Theory Research (Electronic Edition). 2024; (25): 24–26. doi: 10.19569/j.cnki.cn119313/tu.202425008

2. Tang X. Research on Intelligent Landscape Design Based on Distributed Integrated Model. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS). 2023; 19(1): 1–19.

3. Peng L. Intelligent landscape design and land planning based on neural network and wireless sensor network. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2021; 40(2): 2055–2067.

4. Wu B, Tang L, Wang H, et al. Exploration and Teaching Practice of Ideological and Political Elements in Biomechanics Course Experiments. Medical Education Management. 2024; 10(4): 433–438.

5. Shi Y. Research on the Integration Path of Ideological and Political Elements in “Sports Biomechanics” Course (Chinese). In: Proceedings of the 21st National Sports Biomechanics Academic Exchange Conference; 18–22 August 2020; Taiyuan, China.

6. Li D, Fu Y, Chen W, Feng K. Application and Biomechanical Properties of Porous Titanium Alloy Support Rods in Ankle Joint Injury (Chinese). Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. 2017; 21(34): 5413–5417.

7. Zhang L, Li K, Pan Q, et al. Biomechanical Characteristics of “Trabecular” Bionic Dental Implants (Chinese). Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2017, 21(26): 4137–4142.

8. Sachpekidis C, Goldschmidt H, Edenbrandt L, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence Landscape for [18F] FDG PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma. Seminars in nuclear medicine. 2024.

9. Haykal D, Ascher B, Cartier H, Gold M. Exploring the landscape of AI adoption in cosmetic medicine and surgery: Insights from the 25th IMCAS Congress (International Master Course in Aging Science). Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2024; 23(8): 2673–2675.

10. Yu T, Hai J, Yang Q, Wang L. Biomechanical Numerical Calculation and Evaluation of Clubfoot Osteotomy Plan (Chinese). Mechanical Design and Manufacturing. 2024; (12): 364–367+373.

11. Zhang L, Li M, Zhang M, et al. Biomechanical Study on Screw Implantation Angle in Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury Reconstruction (Chinese). Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery. 2024; 38(12): 1480–1485.

12. Ma S, Gao D, Shan Z, et al. Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Verification of Redirected Pedicle Screw Reinsertion (Chinese). Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. 2024; 1–9.

13. Açan EA, Aydın EM, Bulmuş Ö, et al. The effects of gabapentin and pregabalin on fracture healing: A histological, radiological, and biomechanical analysis. Joint diseases and related surgery. 2025; 36(1): 200–209.

14. Neutel CHG, van der Laan KWF, Wesley CD, et al. The MAASWERP Study: An International, Comparative Case Study on Measuring Biomechanics of the Aged Murine Aorta. Pulse. 2025; 13(1): 1–10.

15. Bowden EE, Carter JD, Bowden AE, et al. Significant Environmental Factors in the Drift of Electrical Properties in Conductive Nano-Composite Sensors for Biomechanical Motion-Tracking. Journal of biomedical materials research. 2025; 113(1): e37863.

16. Solano MM, Dumas R, Lesk MR, Costantino S. Ocular Biomechanical Responses to Long-Duration Spaceflight. IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology. 2024; 6: 127–132. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3453049

17. Cofre J. The first embryo, the origin of cancer and animal phylogeny. V. Cancer stem cells as the unifying biomechanical principle between embryology and oncology. Mechanobiology in Medicine. 2025; 3(1): 100110.

18. Huang S, Jin X, Li L, et al. Biomechanical analysis of 3D printed porous extremely-low modulus Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn lumbar interbody fusion cage-A finite element study. Materials Technology. 2024; 39(1): 301–308.

19. Li Z, Meng F, Fang Y, et al. Biomechanical study between two varieties of axial screw fixation techniques: Analysed by finite elements. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2025; 132: 110978.

20. Sadek HS, Anany NM, El-Anwar MI, et al. Biomechanical behavior of cantilevered 3-unit implant-supported prostheses made of PEKK and monolithic zirconia: A finite element study. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2025; 163: 106872.

21. Gusseva M, Thatte N, Castellanos DA, et al. Biomechanical modeling combined with pressure-volume loop analysis to aid surgical planning in patients with complex congenital heart disease. Medical Image Analysis. 2025; 101: 103441.

22. Peters-Dickie JL, Detrembleur C, Guallar-Bouloc M, et al. The effects of foot core exercises and minimalist footwear on foot muscle sizes, foot strength, and biomechanics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Biomechanics. 2025; 122: 106417.

23. Dan M, Moralidou M, Kuder I, et al. High-grade trochlear dysplasia increases patellofemoral joint pressure and decreases the knee extension torque, and tibial tubercle anteriorisation does not correct these effects: Biomechanical study in vitro. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy. 2024; 1024–1028.

24. Rafizadeh SM, Hashemian H, Khorrami-Nejad M, et al. The Effect of Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty on Corneal Biomechanical Parameters. Korean journal of ophthalmology. 2024; 199–208.

25. Zhu J, El-Zein A, Miao G. The effect of diameter and moisture content on biomechanical properties of four native Australian trees. Plant and Soil. 2024; 1–20.

26. Vosoughi AR, Akbarzadeh A, Brevis S, Yoosefinejad AK. Correction to: Clinical and biomechanical comparison of suture-external button versus interference screw associated with V-Y advancement or turndown flaps for flexor hallucis longus transfer in chronic Achilles tendon rupture. Musculoskeletal Surgery. 2024.

27. Nakornnoi T, Srirodjanakul W, Chintavalakorn R, et al. The biomechanical effects of clear aligner trimline designs and extensions on orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1): 1523.

28. Lopes JG, Rodrigues JV, Ramirez I, et al. Microtomographic Analysis of the Biomechanical Performance of Thermally Treated Instruments in Flattened and Curved Root Canals. Journal of Endodontics. 2024; 204–212.

Published
2025-01-20
How to Cite
Zeng, D. (2025). Innovative design and implementation path of biomechanical elements in intelligent landscapes. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 22(2), 1277. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb1277
Section
Article