Analysis of China’s intellectual property legal protection strategy based on machine learning algorithms and biomechanical theory
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the current status and challenges of intellectual property protection in the networked environment from a biomechanical perspective. The research objectives are achieved through literature review, case studies, surveys, the application of risk factor algorithms, and biomechanical analysis. By examining real-world cases and conducting surveys, the study provides an in-depth understanding of the current state and challenges of intellectual property protection. Additionally, a gated recurrent unit (GRU) model is employed to compute the weights of risk factors. Finally, biomechanical analysis is used to evaluate intellectual property risks. Initially, historical intellectual property risk data is collected using the GRU model, relevant risk factors are extracted, and their weights are calculated. Drawing on biomechanical concepts, key variables in risk are analyzed by analogy, where risk is treated as the state variable, risk factors are represented as external forces, and weights denote the magnitude of these forces. A biomechanical model is constructed to analyze the “stress-strain” relationship of risks, thereby uncovering the dynamic interactions between factors and risks from a biomechanical perspective. Ultimately, the study evaluates and predicts future intellectual property risks. manuscript. The results show that within a year, the number of patent infringement, invention infringement, utility model infringement and reprint infringement cases encountered by website creators fluctuates between different quarters. For example, the number of patent infringement cases increased from 52 in the first quarter to 61 in the third quarter, and then decreased to 54 in the fourth quarter; while the number of reprint infringement cases continued to rise, from 78 in the first quarter to 91 in the third quarter, and then decreased slightly to 62 in the fourth quarter. In addition, after strengthening the supervision of intellectual property protection, creators in different occupations have shown an increase in their satisfaction with intellectual property protection, with creators in occupations D and F having the highest satisfaction.
References
1. Tong F. Advancing a biomechanical framework for cellular interaction and mechanotransduction analysis using data mining techniques. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics. 2024; 21(4): 709. doi: 10.62617/mcb709
2. Wang LJ, Li JG. The biomechanical influence of Qianlong health maintenance movement on the mental health of the elderly people. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics. 2025; 22(2): 760. doi: 10.62617/mcb760
3. Ye J. Modeling decision-making dynamics in financial management through biomechanical principles and bio-inspired analytical frameworks. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics. 2024; 21(4): 703. doi: 10.62617/mcb703
4. Mastorakis S, Skiadopoulos A, Shannigrahi S, et al. Networking and Computing in Biomechanical Research: Challenges and Directions. IEEE Communications Magazine. 2021; 59(6): 103-109. doi: 10.1109/mcom.001.2000639
5. Hua N. China’s Industrial Internet Development: Viewed from a Consumer-Internet Perspective. Research on economic transformation in contemporary China. 2019; 2(2): 8-12.
6. Hu C, Wang Y, Liu Y, et al. Research and analysis of energy internet from the perspective of NSFC. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020; 467(1): 012029. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/467/1/012029
7. Bacsardi L, Birkeland R, Hornig A, et al. Present and the Future of Space Internet: The Space Generation Perspective. New Space. 2017; 5(4): 257-267. doi: 10.1089/space.2017.0018
8. Yu C, Zhou L, Liu X. Optimization Analysis of Agricultural Product Supply Chain From the Perspective of Internet. Chinese Business Review. 2017; 16(8). doi: 10.17265/1537-1506/2017.08.005
9. Huang J, Jiaqi LI, Yanfei LI. Survey and Analysis of Community Care Service in Cities and Towns from the Perspective of Internet. Asian Agricultural Research. 2020; 12(9): 2-18.
10. Liu H, Huang J. Structural Optimization on Culture Policy of Intellectual Property in China from the Perspective of Cultural Governance. Journal of central China Normal University. 2019; 58(2): 85-90.
11. Huang C. Recent Development of the Intellectual Property Rights System in China and Challenges Ahead. Management and Organization Review. 2017; 13(1): 39-48. doi: 10.1017/mor.2017.2
12. Feng S, Ma X. To Increase Damages of Intellectual Property Infringement in China: A Double-Edged Sword for the Market. Journal of World Trade. 2019; 53(1): 39-58. doi: 10.54648/trad2019002
13. Lu C, Zhai F, Ma W. Environmental research on the protection of intellectual property rights of large-scale sports events in China. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology. 2019; 20(4): 2004-2011.
14. Shaw AGA. Legal Issues Related to the Requisition of Japanese Yōkai in Intellectual Property Law: The Conflict Between Fair Use, Communal Culture, and Private Ownership. US-China Law Review. 2019; 16(4). doi: 10.17265/1548-6605/2019.04.003
15. Lee G. How to Protect Traditional Food and Foodways Effectively in Terms of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Intellectual Property Laws in the Republic of Korea. International Journal of Cultural Property. 2018; 25(4): 543-572. doi: 10.1017/s0940739118000334
16. Grkaynak G, Yılmaz İ, Yeşilaltay B, et al. Intellectual property law and practice in the blockchain realm. Computer Law & Security Review. 2018; 34(4): 847-862. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2018.05.027
17. Cardoso SD, Faraco CB, de Sousa L, et al. History and evolution of the European legislation on welfare and protection of companion animals. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 2017; 19: 64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2017.01.006
18. Chan HK, Griffin J, Lim JJ, et al. The impact of 3D Printing Technology on the supply chain: Manufacturing and legal perspectives. International Journal of Production Economics. 2018; 205: 156-162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.009
19. Bamakan SMH, Nezhadsistani N, Bodaghi O, et al. Patents and intellectual property assets as non-fungible tokens; key technologies and challenges. Scientific Reports. 2022; 12(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05920-6
20. Maria VI, Koeswahyono I, Suhariningsih, et al. Consumer’s legal protection in the sale and purchase of flats in the pre-project selling system. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478). 2022; 11(2): 454-461. doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i2.1690
21. Chen W, Wu Y. Does intellectual property protection stimulate digital economy development? Journal of Applied Economics. 2022; 25(1): 723-730. doi: 10.1080/15140326.2022.2045846
22. Campi M, Dueñas M. Intellectual property rights, trade agreements, and international trade. Research Policy. 2019; 48(3): 531-545. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.011
23. Sun Y, Liu T, Hu P, et al. Deep intellectual property protection: A survey. arXiv; 2023.
24. Zheng P, Li Z, Zhuang Z. The impact of judicial protection of intellectual property on digital innovation: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters. 2023; 58: 104257. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104257
25. Tang H, Xie Y, Liu Y, et al. Distributed innovation, knowledge re-orchestration, and digital product innovation performance: the moderated mediation roles of intellectual property protection and knowledge exchange activities. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2023; 27(10): 2686-2707. doi: 10.1108/jkm-07-2022-0592
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
