Comprehensive evaluation of health community construction based on biomechanical perspective

  • Xiang Hu School of Design and Arts, Hunan Institute of Engineering, Xiangtan 411104, China
  • Yonghong Lan School of Automation and Electronic Information, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 41105, China
Keywords: healthy community; comprehensive evaluation; principal component; clustering analysis
Article ID: 1025

Abstract

The comprehensive evaluation of healthy community construction is an important means for managers and decision-makers to understand the development of community health within their jurisdiction, and also a scientific basis for formulating practical and feasible health policies and health development plans. Scientific evaluation of the overall level and differences in the construction of healthy communities has important theoretical significance and reference value. Based on the principal component clustering analysis method as well as the theoretical foundation, the multiple evaluation indicators in the evaluation index system of health community construction are standardized and dimensionally reduced. At the same time, the principal component factor load matrix clustering analysis is used, combined with the practical significance and evaluation direction of the indicator categories, to propose a design idea for the classification index system. The comprehensive principal component evaluation and clustering analysis are used to quantitatively examine the level of health community construction in specific regions and make horizontal comparisons, provide theoretical support and decision-making reference for the construction of healthy communities. The correctness and effectiveness of the proposed method system were verified by numerical examples.

References

1. Liu J F, Jia Y W. Users’ intention to continue using online mental health communities: empowerment theory perspective. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021, 18:9427.

2. Brownson R C, Paul C E. Revisiting the future of public health: the good, the bad, and the ugly. American Journal of Public Health, 2024, 114: 479-485.

3. Yang B, Min E, Bloom M S, et al. Community greenness, blood pressure, and hypertension in urban dwellers: The 33 Communities Chinese Health Study. Environment International, 2019, 126: 727-734.

4. Fayshal M A. Unveiling the impact of rapid urbanization on human comfort: a remote sensing-based study in Rajshahi Division, Bangladesh. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2024, 33: 1-35.

5. Reou E. Thermal comfort in outdoor spaces and urban canyon microclimate. Renewable Energy, 2023, 55: 182-188.

6. Thomeer M B, Moody M D, Yahirun J. Racial and ethnic disparities in mental health and mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2023, 10 (2): 961-976.

7. Solano T, Bernal A, Mora D, et al. How bio-inspired solutions have influenced the built environment design in hot and humid climates. Frontiers in Built Environment, 2023, 9: 1267757.

8. Kim H, Rajbhandari A, Krile R, et al. Body mass index trajectories among the healthy communities study children: racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in Childhood Obesity. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 2024, 11(1): 203-215.

9. Liu Y, Huang X, Yang Q, et al. Effects of landscape on thermal livability at the community scale based on fine-grained geographic information: A case study of Shenzhen. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 905: 167091.

10. Los C, Tsai H H. Design of 3D virtual reality in the metaverse for environmental conservation education based on cognitive theory. Sensors, 2022, 22 (21): 8329.

11. Lu H, Dong X X, Li D L, et al. Multimorbidity patterns and health-related quality of life among community-dwelling older adults: evidence from a rural town in Suzhou, China. Quality of Life Research, 2024, 33(5): 1335-1346.

12. Zhang W, Xia Z. A summary of the research on health-oriented community built environment construction and its enlightenment. Urban architecture, 2021, 29: 7-11.

13. Xue H, Cheng X, Jia P, et al. Road network intersection density and childhood obesity risk in the US: a national longitudinal study. Public Health, 2020, 178:31-37.

14. Bruno G, Cavola M, Diglio A, et al. Improving spatial accessibility to regional health systems through facility capacity management. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2020, 71: 100881.

15. Bian H, Ren Z, Zou Y, Yuan S. Quantitative study on the proportion of functional composition of functional mixed Residential area--A case study of Tianjin. Southern architecture, 2021(01):28-34

16. Xie B, Zheng Y, Li Z, et al. Influence of high-density urban built environments on stroke in China: A case study of Wuhan. China City Planning Review, 2022, 3:23-29.

17. Luque G, Muxika J, Mendia O, et al. Green and blue space exposure and non-communicable disease related hospitalizations: A systematic review. Environmental Research, 2023, 4: 118059.

Published
2025-01-22
How to Cite
Hu, X., & Lan, Y. (2025). Comprehensive evaluation of health community construction based on biomechanical perspective. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 22(2), 1025. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb1025
Section
Article