Not just answers: ChatGPT’s expanding role in supporting student motivation
Abstract
This study investigated how college students’ use of ChatGPT has evolved from a tool for simply getting answers to one that supports motivation and learning engagement. Using a novel survey instrument based on Self-Determination Theory, we measured six types of motivation, three intrinsic, two extrinsic, and amotivation, across two cohorts of students (2023 and 2025). Results revealed statistically significant increases in both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation over time. While early use of ChatGPT focused on convenience and task completion, students increasingly reported using it to overcome mental blocks, build momentum, and stay engaged with their academic work. Follow-up analyses of repeat participants and comparisons by class standing suggest these trends reflect broader shifts in student engagement, not just cohort or experience differences. Cluster analysis revealed distinct motivational profiles, highlighting variation in how students incorporate ChatGPT into their academic routines. These findings suggest that as generative artificial intelligence becomes more familiar, accessible, and sophisticated, students are integrating it more deeply into their learning processes, not just for answers, but for sustained motivation and support.
References
1. Altman S. OpenAI’s Sam Altman on Building the ‘Core AI Subscription’ for Your Life [Video]. YouTube; 2025.
2. Annamalai N, Ab Rashid R, Hashmi UM, et al. Using chatbots for English language learning in higher education. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence. 2023; 5: 100153. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100153
3. Annamalai N, Bervell B, Mireku D, et al. Artificial intelligence in higher education: Modelling students’ motivation for continuous use of ChatGPT based on a modified self-determination theory. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence. 2025; 8: 100346. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100346
4. Cronjé J. Exploring the role of ChatGPT as a peer coach for developing research proposals: Feedback quality, prompts, and student reflection. Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 2023; 22(2): 1–15. doi: 10.34190/ejel.21.5.3042
5. Chen BX. It’s not just a chatbot, it’s a life coach. N Y Times; 2023.
6. Almulla MA. Investigating influencing factors of learning satisfaction in AI ChatGPT for research: University students perspective. Heliyon. 2024; 10(11): e32220. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32220
7. Chiu TKF. A classification tool to foster self-regulated learning with generative artificial intelligence by applying self-determination theory: A case of ChatGPT. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2024; 72: 2401–2416. doi: 10.1007/s11423-024-10366-w
8. Ng DTK, Tan CW, Leung JKL. Empowering student self‐regulated learning and science education through ChatGPT: A pioneering pilot study. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2024; 55(4): 1328–1353. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13454
9. Hmoud M, Swaity H, Hamad N, et al. Higher education students’ task motivation in the generative artificial intelligence context: The case of ChatGPT. Information. 2024; 15(1): 33. doi: 10.3390/info15010033
10. Budu J, Oteng K. Exploring students’ use and outcomes of ChatGPT. Proceedings of the ISCAP Conference. 2024; 10(6185).
11. Ilić J, Ivanovic M. The impact of ChatGPT on student learning experience in higher STEM education: A systematic literature review. In: Proc 2024 21st Int Conf IT-Based Higher Educ Training (ITHET). IEEE; 2024. doi: 10.1109/ITHET61869.2024.10837649
12. Qi C, Tang Y, Lei Y. Does feedback from ChatGPT help? Investigating the effect of feedback from both teacher and ChatGPT on students’ learning outcomes. In: Proc 30th Americas Conf Info Syst (AMCIS); 2024.
13. Cardona MA, Rodríguez RJ, Ishmael K. Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology; 2023.
14. Fan Y, Tang L, Le H, et al. Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2024; 56(2): 489–530. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13544
15. Ye JH, Zhang M, Nong W, et al. The relationship between inert thinking and ChatGPT dependence: An I-PACE model perspective. Education and Information Technologies 2025; 30(3): 3885–3909. doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12966-8
16. Deng R, Jiang M, Yu X, et al. Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers & Education. 2025; 227: 105224. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224
17. Zogheib S, Zogheib B. Understanding university students’ adoption of ChatGPT: Insights from TAM, SDT, and beyond. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research. 2024; 23: 25. doi: 10.28945/5377
18. Ansari AN, Ahmad S, Bhutta SM. Mapping the global evidence around the use of ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic scoping review. Education and Information Technologies. 2024;29(9):11281–11321. doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12223-4
19. Quintanilla Villegas MA, Pineda Rivas EE. Evidences from the literature on the motivations, consequences, and concerns regarding the use of artificial intelligence in higher education. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental. 2025; 19(3): 1–16. doi: 10.24857/rgsa.v19n3-097
20. Ali D, Fatemi Y, Boskabadi E, et al. ChatGPT in teaching and learning: A systematic review. Educational Sciences. 2024; 14(6): 643. doi: 10.3390/educsci14060643
21. Jo H. From concerns to benefits: A comprehensive study of ChatGPT usage in education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2024; 21(35). doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00471-4
22. Woerner JHR, Turtova AP, Lang ASID. Transformative potentials and ethical considerations of AI tools in higher education: Case studies and reflections. In: Proc SoutheastCon 2024; Atlanta, GA, USA. IEEE; 2024. pp. 510–515. doi: 10.1109/SoutheastCon52093.2024.10500042
23. Abramson A. How to use ChatGPT as a learning tool. Monitor on Psychology. 2023; 54(4): 67.
24. Hasanein AM, Sobaih AEE. Drivers and consequences of ChatGPT use in higher education: Key stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Investigation Health Psychology Education. 2023; 13(11): 2599–2614. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13110181
25. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2020; 61: 101860. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
26. Deci EL, Olafsen AH, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2017; 4: 19–43. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
27. Bureau JS, Howard JL, Chong JX, Guay F. Pathways to student motivation: A meta-analysis of antecedents of autonomous and controlled motivations. Review of Educational Research. 2022; 92(1): 46–72. doi: 10.3102/00346543211042426
28. Wang C, Hsu HCK, Bonem EM, et al. Need satisfaction and need dissatisfaction: A comparative study of online and face-to-face learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019; 95: 114–125. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.034
29. Chan CKY, Hu W. Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2023; 20(1): 1–18. doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
30. Yilmaz R, Yilmaz FGK. The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2023; 4: 100147. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147
31. Hu YH. Implementing generative AI chatbots as a decision aid for enhanced values clarification exercises in online business ethics education. Educational Technology & Society. 2024;27(3):356–373.
32. Bettayeb AM, Alkholy SO, Alshurideh MT. Exploring the impact of ChatGPT: Conversational AI in education. Frontiers Education. 2024; 9. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1379796
33. Sok S, Heng K. Opportunities, challenges, and strategies for using ChatGPT in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Digital Educational Technology. 2024; 4(1): ep2401. doi: 10.30935/jdet/14027
34. Zhang X, Zhang X, Liu H. Reflections on enhancing higher education classroom effectiveness through the introduction of large language models. Journal Modern Educational Research. 2024; 3: 19. doi: 10.53964/jmer.2024019
35. Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Blais MR, et al. Academic motivation scale (AMS-C 28), college (CEGEP) version. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1993; 52(53).
36. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.5.0) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024.
37. Harder JA, Klehm C, Lang ASID, et al. Dataset and survey questions for Not Just Answers: ChatGPT’s Expanding Role in Supporting Student Motivation [dataset]. Figshare; 2025. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.29263697
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submit a Paper
