Innovation and sustainable development among multinational enterprises in Nigeria

  • Chinyere Ogo Nwamaka Department of Management, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Nigeria – Enugu Campus, Enugu 400211, Nigeria
  • Anthony Aniagbaoso Igwe Department of Management, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Nigeria – Enugu Campus, Enugu 400211, Nigeria
  • Bishop Ogo Onyekachi Department of Management, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Nigeria – Enugu Campus, Enugu 400211, Nigeria
  • Ekom Etim Akpan Department of Management, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Nigeria – Enugu Campus, Enugu 400211, Nigeria
Keywords: innovation; sustainable development; multinational enterprises; Nigeria; economic sustainability; environmental sustainability; social sustainability
Ariticle ID: 80

Abstract

This study explores the effect of innovation on sustainable development among multinational enterprises (MNEs) operating in Nigeria. Utilizing a cross-sectional survey design, the research investigates how innovation practices within MNEs influence the economic, environmental, and social dimensions of sustainable development in the Nigerian context. Data were collected from workers of five multinational corporations using a structured questionnaire. The study hypotheses were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) via SmartPLS 3.2.9. The findings demonstrate a positive and significant effect of innovation on all three dimensions of sustainable development. This suggests that MNEs fostering innovation contribute meaningfully to achieving broader societal goals beyond economic profit. The study further recommended that MNEs should integrate sustainability metrics into their innovation performance evaluations. Track how their innovations contribute to economic growth, environmental improvements, and social well-being. This will help them identify the most impactful innovations and guide future investments towards projects that generate shared value for their business and society.

References

1. Afolabi IA. The impact of innovation on firm performance in Nigeria. Journal of International Business Research. 2018; 12(3); 1-10.

2. Oyedele LO. Innovation and job creation in Nigeria: A review of the literature. Journal of African Business. 2021; 22(4): 599-614.

3. Ndiaye PM. Innovation in multinational enterprises in developing countries: A review of the literature. Journal of International Business Review. 2022; 23(4); 709-728.

4. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 10 January 2024).

5. Okereke C. The role of multinational enterprises in sustainable development in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development. 2020; 13(4): 147-157.

6. Oni OA. Social innovation and sustainable development in Nigeria: The role of multinational enterprises. International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation. 2022; 13(2): 189-202.

7. Drucker PF. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Routledge; 1994.

8. O’Sullivan D, Kathuria V. Innovation: Strategies for Creating and Winning in a Changing World. Routledge; 2018.

9. Tidd J, Bessant J. Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley & Sons; 2014.

10. Chesbrough H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press; 2010.

11. Fagerberg J. Why firms innovate: A theoretical framework. Research Policy. 2014; 43(7): 1075-1087.

12. Lundan S, Treue T. Multinational Enterprises and Sustainable Development: A Critical Review. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021; 178(2): 339-362.

13. Osuagwu U. The challenges of sustainable development in Nigeria: A critical review. Journal of Sustainable Development. 2018; 11(10): 101-108.

14. van Niekerk AJ. Inclusive Economic Sustainability: SDGs and Global Inequality. Sustainability. 2020; 12(13): 5427. doi: 10.3390/su12135427.

15. Adefemi JM. Climate change in Nigeria: Impacts, vulnerability and adaptation strategies. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2022; 23(13): 12767-12783.

16. IEA. World Energy Outlook 2023. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023 (accessed on 10 January 2024).

17. FAO. Nigeria: Agricultural outlook 2021-2030. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/cb9211en/cb9211en.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2024).

18. Njoku JU, Onyegbula JC. Human Capital Development as a Strategy for Sustainable Development in the Nigerian Education System. 2017; 11(2): 178-189.

19. Hoareau CE, Ahmad N, Nuid M, et al Sustainable Technology in Developed Countries: Waste Municipal Management. Industrial and Domestic Waste Management, 2021; 1(1): 48-55. doi: 10.53623/idwm.v1i1.49

20. Global Reporting Initiative. Sustainability Reporting Standards. Global Reporting Initiative; 2023.

21. Siri E, Lisa FE, Schipper MSS, et al, Adaptation interventions and their effect on vulnerability in developing countries: Help, hindrance or irrelevance? World Development. 2021; 141: 105383.

22. Apostu SA, Vasile V, Panait M, et al. Exploring the ecological efficiency as the path to resilience. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2022; 36(2). doi: 10.1080/1331677x.2022.2108476

23. Nidhi S, Chaudhuri P, Rahaman SH. The role of social innovation in promoting sustainable development in developing countries: A case study of India. Journal of Global Responsibility. 2019; 10(1): 127-145.

24. Baregheh A, Maleki S, Abbasi M. The potential of digital platforms for citizen participation in environmental decision-making: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021; 290: 112649.

25. Calderone D, De Marchi V, Grandinetti E. Green innovation and SMEs: Exploring the role of public policies and financial incentives. Sustainability. 2021; 13(10): 5458.

26. Mazzucato M. The state needs its own innovation agency. Nature. 2018; 559(7712): 310-311.

27. Ercan H, Savranlar B, Polat MA, et al. The impact of technological innovations on the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from EU-27. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. 2024; 31(13): 19886–19903. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32303-3

28. Brynolfsson E, McAfee A. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company; 2014.

29. Geels FW. Socio-technical transitions and the coevolution of innovations, markets and policy: A research agenda. Research Policy. 2012; 41(6): 886-895.

30. Akpan EE, Johnny E, Sylva W. Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Resilience of Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective. 2021; 26(1): 48-64. doi: 10.1177/0972262920984545.

31. Hulland J. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal. 1999; 20(2): 195-204. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7

32. OECD. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd ed. OECD Publishing; 2005.

33. Ivwurie EA, Akpan EE. Strategic corporate social responsibility and organisational sustainability of multinational corporations in Nigeria. Pressacademia. 2021; 8(2): 51-61. doi: 10.17261/pressacademia.2021.1397.

34. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Research. 2011; 48(4): 193-221.

35. Chin WW, Newsted PR. Structural equation modeling with partial least squares: A comparison of two software packages. Computer & Information Science. 1999; 2: 215-241.

36. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Alternative to Traditional Structural Equation Modeling. Sage Publications; 2017.

37. Chin WW. The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. In: Marcoulides GA (Editor). Modern Methods for Business Research. Sage Publications; 1998. pp. 295-336.

38. Waribugo S, Ofoegbu W, Akpan EE. The Impact of Knowledge Management on Product Innovation of Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria. Information and Knowledge Management. 2016; 6(6): 78-87.

39. Hahn T, Preuss L, Pinkse J, et al. Cognitive Frames in Corporate Sustainability: Managerial Sensemaking with Paradoxical and Business Case Frames. Academy of Management Review. 2014; 39(4): 463-487. doi: 10.5465/amr.2012.0341

40. Schaltegger S, Figge F. Twenty-five years of international sustainability reporting: An analysis and a look into the future. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2011; 19(5): 512-523.

41. Yazdani S, Momeni M, Asgari M. Innovation and social sustainability: A review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 290: 125919.

42. Murillo-Luna JL, Munuera-Alemán JL, Arana-Alcázar JM. Social innovation and the environment: A theoretical framework. Journal of Business Ethics. 2008; 82(2): 283-293.

43. Tsuru M, Ueno T, Fujita M. Innovation for sustainability: A case study of Japanese companies. Journal of Business Ethics. 2010; 94(1): 7-25.

Published
2024-09-05
How to Cite
Nwamaka, C. O., Igwe, A. A., Onyekachi, B. O., & Akpan, E. E. (2024). Innovation and sustainable development among multinational enterprises in Nigeria. Sustainable Economies, 2(3), 80. https://doi.org/10.62617/se.v2i3.80
Section
Article