SWOT analysis of rain tax in Canada

  • Amit Joshi Gandhi Memorial Intercontinental School, Jakarta 14410, Indonesia
  • Shawaiz Alhassan Gandhi Memorial Intercontinental School, Jakarta 14410, Indonesia
Keywords: stormwater management; green infrastructure; public policy; sustainability initiatives; environmental taxation
Article ID: 554

Abstract

This study highlights the potential of stormwater fees, commonly referred to as “rain taxes”, as a solution to urban stormwater management challenges within Canada, attributed to the increased urbanization and climate change impacts. A comprehensive SWOT analysis reveals the rain taxes ability to generate dedicated funding to be utilized for sustainable stormwater infrastructure, incentivizing property owners to reduce runoff, and enhance climate resilience. However, challenges such as administrative complexities, public resistance and possible uneven economic impacts may limit the taxation’s widespread adoption. The paper highlights the importance of communication, equitable fee structures and community engagement to develop public acceptance and develop fairness. Opportunities for leveraging these taxes in order to drive green infrastructure investments, advancements within technology and inter-municipal collaboration are emphasized. Moreover, the study underscores the need for adaptive management strategies and consistent policy frameworks to approach long-term sustainability goals. Limitations of the SWOT analysis comprising of the subjectivity and possible lack of depth are acknowledged, emphasizing the importance of iterative reassessment in dynamic urban and environmental contexts. The findings within this analysis provides actionable insights for policymakers, stakeholders and municipalities to design and implement rain taxes effectively, ensuring their role as a key tool within Canada’s urban sustainability strategies on the basis of stormwater management.

References

1. Müller J, Schneider M, Dittmer U. Stormwater Management in Germany: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective. Water; 2019.

2. Philadelphia Water Department. Green City, Clean Waters: The City of Philadelphia’s Program for Managing Stormwater. Retrieved from Philadelphia Water; 2016.

3. Seattle Public Utilities. Stormwater Management: Overview. Retrieved from Seattle Public Utilities; 2020.

4. Environment Agency. Managing Surface Water: A Guide for Local Authorities. Retrieved from Environment Agency; 2021.

5. Van Rijswick H, Bergh J, Wesselink A. The Integration of Stormwater Management in Urban Planning in the Netherlands: Lessons from Amsterdam. Water Policy; 2014.

6. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Stormwater Management in Urban Areas. Retrieved from Swedish EPA; 2018.

7. Niazi M, Nietch C, Maghrebi M, et al. Storm water management model: Performance review and gap analysis. Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment. 2017; 3(2): 04017002.

8. Kundan H. Sustainability in the City of Mississauga: Feasibility of a Bike Share Program. University of Toronto’s Journal of Scientific Innovation. 2023.

9. Vallianatos H, Friese K, Perez JM, et al. ACCESS Open Minds at the University of Alberta: Transforming student mental health services in a large Canadian post‐secondary educational institution. Early Intervention in Psychiatry. 2019; 13(S1): 56-64. doi: 10.1111/eip.12819

10. Indonesia WRI. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Benefits; 2021.

11. Pretti TJ, McRae N. Preparing Gen Y and Z for the future of work through co-operative education: A case study on the University of Waterloo. In: Applications of work integrated learning among Gen Z and Y students. IGI Global; 2021.

12. Youngerman ZZR. Social marketing, financial, and regulatory mechanisms for adoption of water conservation and stormwater management practices by single-family households [PhD thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2013.

13. Daniell KA, Coombes PJ, White I. Politics of innovation in multi-level water governance systems. Journal of Hydrology. 2014; 519: 2415-2435. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.058

14. Sarzynski A. Public participation, civic capacity, and climate change adaptation in cities. Urban Climate. 2015; 14: 52-67. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.08.002

15. Roberts KA. Perceptions Influencing Confidence in Federal Tax Compliance of Small Businesses: A Qualitative Exploratory Case Study [PhD thesis]. University of Phoenix; 2020.

16. Haris H, Chow MF, Usman F, et al. Urban stormwater management model and tools for designing stormwater management of green infrastructure practices. In IOP conference series: earth and environmental science. 2016; 32(1): 012022).

17. Weaver DA, Bimber B. Finding News Stories: A Comparison of Searches Using Lexisnexis and Google News. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2008; 85(3): 515-530. doi: 10.1177/107769900808500303

18. Yousuf MI. Using expertsopinions through Delphi technique. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation; 2007.

19. Williams PL, Webb C. The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1994; 19(1): 180-186. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01066.x

20. Linstone HA. The delphi technique. In: Environmental impact assessment, technology assessment, and risk analysis: contributions from the psychological and decision sciences. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1985.

21. Arik AD. Disambiguating Concepts of Fairness in Stormwater Management: A Review of Economic Efficiency and Equity. Water Resources Research. 2024; 60(5). doi: 10.1029/2023wr035743

22. Porse E, Kerner M, Shinneman J, et al. Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services. Water Policy. 2022; 24(6): 998-1013. doi: 10.2166/wp.2022.024

23. Siegrist J, Anderson D, et al. Assessing SWMM 5 Hydrologic Parameter Benefits for Model Calibration. Journal of Water Management Modeling. 2016.

24. Cousins JJ, Hill DT. Green infrastructure, stormwater, and the financialization of municipal environmental governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 2021; 23(5): 581-598. doi: 10.1080/1523908x.2021.1893164

25. Lyster O, Ashley S. The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an award. IISD; 2022.

26. Chow MF, Yusop Z, & Toriman, ME. Modelling runoff quantity and quality in tropical urban catchments using Storm Water Management Model. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2012; 9: 737-748.

27. Mguni P, Herslund L, Jensen MB. Sustainable urban drainage systems: examining the potential for green infrastructure-based stormwater management for Sub-Saharan cities. Natural Hazards. 2016; 82(S2): 241-257. doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2309-x

28. Liu J. Innovative strategies to involve Canadian communities in Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) International Programs; Uvicspace; 2015.

29. Axelsson C, van Sebille E. Prevention through policy: Urban macroplastic leakages to the marine environment during extreme rainfall events. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2017; 124(1): 211-227. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.024

30. Waters D, Watt We, Marsalek J, et al. Adaptation of a Storm Drainage System to Accommodate Increased Rainfall Resulting from Climate Change. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2003; 46(5): 755-770. doi: 10.1080/0964056032000138472

31. Henstra D, Thistlethwaite J, Vanhooren S. The governance of climate change adaptation: stormwater management policy and practice. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2019; 63(6): 1077-1096.

32. Bird RM. Why We Should But Don’t Pay the Right Prices for Urban Infrastructure. Rotman School of Management; 2017.

33. Hobbie SE, Grimm NB. Nature-based approaches to managing climate change impacts in cities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2020; 375(1794): 20190124. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0124

34. Pelley J. Canadians vote “Yes” for climate action. ESA Journals; 2019.

35. Brandt O. News Media Framing of Climate Change in Canada: A Provincial Analysis of 2015-2018 [Master’s thesis] University of Toronto; 2021.

36. Madeley J. Big business, poor peoples: How transnational corporations damage the world’s poor. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2009.

37. Potter C, Godshall L. Renting at the Edge of the World: Climate Change Protections Failing Renters. Wash. UJL & Pol’y; 2024.

38. Bazel P, Mintz J. The free ride is over: Why cities, and citizens, must start paying for much-needed infrastructure. SPP Research Paper. 2014; 7-14.

39. Azizi MM. The user-pays system in the provision of urban infrastructure: Effectiveness and equity criteria. Urban Studies. 2000; 37(8): 1345-1357.

40. Puzyreva M, Roy D, Stanley M. Case study research on offsets for water quality management. International Institute for Sustainable Development; 2019.

41. Sousa MR, Rudolph DL, Frind EO. Threats to groundwater resources in urbanizing watersheds: The Waterloo Moraine and beyond. Canadian Water Resources Journal/Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques. 2014; 39(2): 193-208. doi: 10.1080/07011784.2014.914801

42. Bailey SJ. Charges for local infrastructure. Town Planning Review. 1990; 61(4): 427.

43. Sandink D, Robinson B. Wastewater System Inflow/Infiltration and Residential Pluvial Flood Damage Mitigation in Canada. Water. 2022; 14(11): 1716. doi: 10.3390/w14111716

44. Liu S, Qi W, Zhang A. Toward Stormwater-Resilient Cities: Robust Planning Against Extreme Rainfalls. Rotman School of Management Working Paper; 2022.

45. Canteiro M, Cotler H, Mazari-Hiriart M, et al. Natural dynamics and watershed approach incorporation in urban water management: A scoping review. PLOS ONE. 2024; 19(8): e0309239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309239

46. Zerbe J. Paying for Urban Infrastructure Adaptation in Canada. Action on Climate Team; 2019.

47. Levmore S. Taxes as Ballots. The University of Chicago Law Review; 1998.

48. Emery H. A Brief History of Infrastructure in Canada, 1870-2015. Canadian Federalism and Infrastructure. 2018; 17-26.

49. Bassi A, Cuéllar A, Pallaske G, Wuennenberg L. Stormwater markets: Concepts and applications. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development; 2017.

50. Cettner A, Ashley R, Viklander M, et al. Stormwater management and urban planning: Lessons from 40 years of innovation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2013; 56(6): 786-801. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2012.706216

51. Fabiani CA, Pisello L. Urban heat mitigation and adaptation: the state of the art. Mitigation and Adaptation of Urban Overheating: The Impact of Warmer Cities on Climate, Energy, Health, Environmental Quality, Economy, and Quality of Life; 2024.

52. Hettiarachchi S, Wasko C, Sharma A. Increase in flood risk resulting from climate change in a developed urban watershed – the role of storm temporal patterns. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2018; 22(3): 2041-2056. doi: 10.5194/hess-22-2041-2018

53. Lamoureux S, Forbes DL, Bell T, et al. The impact of climate change on infrastructure in the western and central Canadian Arctic. From Science to Policy in the Western and Central Canadian Arctic; 2015.

54. Dávila Aquije D. Paying for stormwater management: what are the options? Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance; 2016

55. Walker H. Jr., Hansen PL. Local Government and Rainfall: The Problem of Local Government in the Northern Great Plains. American Political Science Review. 1946; 40(6), 1113-1123.

56. Filatova T. Market-based instruments for flood risk management: A review of theory, practice and perspectives for climate adaptation policy. Environmental Science & Policy. 2014; 37: 227-242. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.09.005

57. Marriott, A. Clean, Resilient Flood Technology Options in Canada. Adaptation to Climate Change Team, Simon Fraser University; 2020.

58. Lieberherr E, Green OO. Green Infrastructure through Citizen Stormwater Management: Policy Instruments, Participation and Engagement. Sustainability. 2018; 10(6): 2099. doi: 10.3390/su10062099

59. Dhakal KP, Chevalier LR. Managing urban stormwater for urban sustainability: Barriers and policy solutions for green infrastructure application. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017; 203: 171-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.065

60. Ghadge K. Institutional Barriers and Enablers for Green Infrastructure Implementation: A Case-Study of the City of Brampton, Ontario, using the Institutional Analysis and Development framework [Master’s thesis]. University of Waterloo; 2019.

61. Scharff EA. Green Fees: The Challenge of Pricing Externalities Under State Law. Law, Environmental Science, Economics; 2018.

62. Diggle A. Exploring the Capacity of the Extended Producer Responsibility Principle to Incentivize the Collection and Recycling of Plastic Food Packaging Waste [Master’s thesis]. Dalhousie University; 2022.

63. Doern GB, Stoney C, Hilton R. Keeping Canada Running: Infrastructure and the Future of Governance in a Pandemic World. McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP; 2021.

64. O’brien P, O’Neill P, Pike A. Funding, financing and governing urban infrastructures. Urban Studies. 2019; 56(7): 1291-1303.

65. Novaes C, Marques R. Stormwater Utilities: A Sustainable Answer to Many Questions. Sustainability. 2022; 14(10): 6179. doi: 10.3390/su14106179

66. Young D, Keil R. Locating the Urban In‐between: Tracking the Urban Politics of Infrastructure in Toronto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2014; 38(5): 1589-1608.

67. Kotak C. Sustainable infrastructure planning: using development charges for stormwater management. Mspace; 2015.

68. Kollman K. Outside lobbying: Public opinion and interest group strategies. Princeton University Press; 1998.

69. Tovilla E. Value of a made-in-Ontario management system standard for municipal wastewater and stormwater utilities. Water Quality Research Journal. 2020; 56(1): 1-18. doi: 10.2166/wqrj.2020.124

70. Moudrak N, Feltmate B, Venema H, Osman H. Combating Canada’s Rising Flood Costs: Natural infrastructure is an underutilized option. Prepared for Insurance Bureau of Canada. Intact Centre on Climate Adaptation, University of Waterloo; 2018.

71. Potoglou D, Kanaroglou PS. Modelling car ownership in urban areas: a case study of Hamilton, Canada. Journal of Transport Geography. 2008; 16(1): 42-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.01.006

72. Heaman EA, Tough D. Who Pays for Canada? McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP; 2020.

73. Swanson D, Murphy D, Temmer J, Scaletta T. Advancing the Climate Resilience of Canadian Infrastructure. IISD; 2021.

74. Helms MM, Nixon J. Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now? Journal of Strategy and Management. 2010; 3(3): 215-251. doi: 10.1108/17554251011064837

75. Gürel E. swot analysis: A theoretical review. Journal of International Social Research. 2017; 10(51): 994-1006. doi: 10.17719/jisr.2017.1832

76. Sanoh ALY. Rainfall shocks, local revenues, and intergovernmental transfer in Mali. World Development. 2015; 66: 359-370.

77. Piontek W. Legal, economic, and environmental conditions for the application of “fee for discharging rainwater and snowmelt into waters” in Poland. Economics and Environment. 2022; 82(3): 235-256.

78. Rautio, J. Social media monitoring in small and medium sized organizations in Finland. Business, Computer Science; 2013.

79. Conservation CV. Economic Instruments to Facilitate Stormwater Management on Private Property. The Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program; 2018.

80. Tyrrell J. “Collecting spring water reminds us how to be human”: in search of an ethic of care for the springs of southern Cape Town. OpenUCT; 2021.

81. Panagiotou G. Bringing SWOT into Focus. Business Strategy Review. 2003; 14(2): 8-10. doi: 10.1111/1467-8616.00253

82. McDonald M, Hill R. Marketing plans: How to prepare them, how to use them. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2005.

Published
2024-12-31
How to Cite
Joshi, A., & Alhassan, S. (2024). SWOT analysis of rain tax in Canada. Sustainable Economies, 3(1), 554. https://doi.org/10.62617/se554
Section
Article