Climate change and economic growth: Some critical reflections
Abstract
Global warming may affect the economic development and, thus, the welfare of people around the world. Therefore, the economic effects of a changing climate should be known in order to be able to design appropriate policy responses. In the economics literature, one research field empirically analyzes the growth effects of global warming. But often those studies do not account for economic variables that have turned out to be significant in explaining economic growth. In addition, they frequently fail to check for the robustness of their outcomes. This can give rise to biased results regarding the growth process and, therefore, does not necessarily reflect the true data-generating process. Hence, the question comes up: how valid and reliable the results are. Therefore, economic analyses should be undertaken that study the robustness of the results as regards the integration of fundamental economic variables. When policy recommendations are made on how to deal with global warming, we argue that they should be based on robust results only. If that does not hold, economic policy risks being inadequate, giving rise to substantial welfare losses.
References
1. Greiner A. Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth. Ashgate Publishing Company; 1996.
2. Solow RM. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1957; 39(3): 312. doi: 10.2307/1926047
3. Tinbergen, Jan. " On the theory of long-term economic development (German)." Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 1942; 55: 511-549.
4. Leamer, E.E. "Sensitivity Analyses Would Help." American Economic Review. 1985; 75(3): 308-313.
5. Levine, R., Renelt, D. "A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions." American Economic Review. 1992; 82(4): 942-963.
6. Leamer, E.E. "Let's Take the Con Out of Econometrics." American Economic Review. 1983; 73(1): 31-43.
7. Sala-i-Martin X. I Just Ran Four Million Regressions. National Bureau of Economic Research; 1997. doi: 10.3386/w6252
8. Bruns SB, Ioannidis JPA. Determinants of economic growth: Different time different answer? Journal of Macroeconomics. 2020; 63: 103185. doi: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2019.103185
9. Arias PA. "Technical Summary." In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 2021.
10. Meinshausen M, Meinshausen N, Hare W, et al. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature. 2009; 458(7242): 1158-1162. doi: 10.1038/nature08017
11. Sherwood SC, Webb MJ, Annan JD, et al. An Assessment of Earth’s Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence. Reviews of Geophysics. 2020; 58(4). doi: 10.1029/2019rg000678
12. Greiner A, Semmler W. Economic growth and global warming: A model of multiple equilibria and thresholds. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2005; 57(4): 430-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2005.04.007
13. Nocera S, Tonin S, Cavallaro F. The economic impact of greenhouse gas abatement through a meta-analysis: Valuation, consequences and implications in terms of transport policy. Transport Policy. 2015; 37: 31-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.10.004
14. Neumann JE, Willwerth J, Martinich J, et al. Climate Damage Functions for Estimating the Economic Impacts of Climate Change in the United States. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 2020; 14(1): 25-43. doi: 10.1093/reep/rez021
15. Keller, K., Nicholas, R. "Improving Climate Projections to Better Inform Cli- mate Risk Management." The Oxford Handbook of the Macroeconomics of Global Warming. Oxford University Press: Oxford; 2015. pp. 9-18.
16. Nordhaus W, Moffat A. A Survey of Global Impacts of Climate Change: Replication, Survey Methods, and a Statistical Analysis. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2017. doi: 10.3386/w23646
17. Botzen WJW, Deschenes O, Sanders M. The Economic Impacts of Natural Disasters: A Review of Models and Empirical Studies. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 2019; 13(2): 167-188. doi: 10.1093/reep/rez004
18. Newell RG, Prest BC, Sexton SE. The GDP-Temperature relationship: Implications for climate change damages. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2021; 108: 102445. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102445
19. Barker, D. "Temperature and U.S. Economic Growth: Comment on Colacito, Hoffmannn, and Phan." Econ Journal Watch. 2022; 19(2): 176-189.
20. Colacito R, Hoffmann B, Phan T. Temperature and Growth: A Panel Analysis of the United States. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 2018; 51(2-3): 313-368. doi: 10.1111/jmcb.12574
21. Rosen RA. Temperature impact on GDP growth is overestimated. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019; 116(33): 16170-16170. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908081116
22. Dell M, Jones BF, Olken BA. Temperature Shocks and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Last Half Century. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. 2012; 4(3): 66-95. doi: 10.1257/mac.4.3.66
23. Burke M, Hsiang SM, Miguel E. Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production. Nature. 2015; 527(7577): 235-239. doi: 10.1038/nature15725
24. Barker, D. "Temperature Shocks and Economic Growth: Comment on Dell, Jones, and Olken." Econ Journal Watch. 2023; 20(2): 234-253.
25. Barker, D. "Global Non-Linear Effect of Temperature on Economic Production: Comment on Burke, Hsiang, and Miguel." Econ Journal Watch. 2024; 21(1): 35-68.
26. Greiner A, Bökemeier B, Owusu B. Climate change and economic growth: Evidence for European countries. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2024; 00: 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12605
27. Jacob D, Kotova L, Teichmann C, et al. Climate Impacts in Europe Under +1.5°C Global Warming. Earth’s Future. 2018; 6(2): 264-285. doi: 10.1002/2017ef000710
28. Pala A. The relation between climate change and economic growth: the in-vestigation the regional differences with rcm model in eu-28 countries. International Journal of Economic Sciences. 2020; IX(1). doi: 10.20472/es.2020.9.1.008
29. Owusu B, Bökemeier B, Greiner A. Regime-based debt sustainability analysis: Evidence from euro area economies. European Journal of Political Economy. 2023: 102458. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102458
30. Arasu, S. ''Group of 20 countries agree to increase clean energy but reach no deal on phasing out fossil fuels.'' Available online: https://apnews.com/article/india-climate-change-g20-cop28-c25dd753a2f8f520261ec4858b921a1a (accessed on 2 June 2024).
31. AEC. ''We will not Sell-Out by Phasing Out: African Negotiations Urged to Fight for Africa.'' Available online: https://energychamber.org/we-will-not-sell-out-by-phasing-out-african-negotiations-urged-to-fight-for-africa/ (accessed on 2 June 2024).
32. An J, Mikhaylov A, Jung SU. The Strategy of South Korea in the Global Oil Market. Energies. 2020; 13(10): 2491. doi: 10.3390/en13102491
33. Mutalimov V, Kovaleva I, Mikhaylov A, et al. Assessing regional growth of small business in Russia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review. 2021; 9(3): 119-133. doi: 10.15678/eber.2021.090308
34. Kant I. Kritik Der reinen Vernunft. De Gruyter; 1923 (first print: 1787). doi: 10.1515/9783111496580
Copyright (c) 2024 Alfred Greiner
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submit a Paper
