Attitudes of consumers towards ethical buying and fair trade in Slovakia
Abstract
Nowadays, more and more consumers have an increased interest in the field of ethics and social responsibility, which they present in connection with the companies they buy from. The attitude towards ethical shopping becomes particularly important in the context of sustainable development and environmental protection. Slovakia, as a member of the European Union, is not left out of this trend. In the contribution, we focus on the attitude of consumers in Slovakia towards ethical shopping through an applied questionnaire inquiry. Ethical shopping is the way consumers think when choosing products, considering the conditions under which products are produced, distributed, and disposed. When choosing products, consumers consider not only the impact of these products on the environment but also whether adequate working conditions were observed during their production. We obtained data on the attitudes of consumers in Slovakia through a survey, using the questionnaire method. The survey focused on selected areas of ethical shopping, with a special focus on fair trade and its knowledge among consumers in Slovakia. Based on the results of the survey, we suggest ways to educate as well as motivate consumers in Slovakia to realize ethical buying to a greater extent.
References
1. Hiller A, Goworek H. Ethical Consumption. Routledge; 2023. doi: 10.4324/9781003246954
2. Xing C, Zhang Y, Tripe D. Ethical Consumers and Low-Income Sellers on China’s Reward-Based Crowdfunding Platforms: Are Poverty Alleviation Campaigns More Successful? Journal of Business Ethics. 2024; 191(4): 793-810. doi: 10.1007/s10551-024-05666-3
3. Gupta R, Chandrasekaran D, Sen S, et al. Marketing to Bottom-of-the-Pyramid Consumers in an Emerging Market: The Responses of Mainstream Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics. 2024; 191(4): 739-755. doi: 10.1007/s10551-024-05664-5
4. Osburg VS, Yoganathan V, Bartsch F, et al. How Sustainable Luxury Influences Product Value Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions: A Comparative Study of Emerging vs. Developed Markets. Journal of Business Ethics. 2024; 191(4): 713-738. doi: 10.1007/s10551-024-05661-8
5. Chan RYK, Sharma P, Alqahtani A, et al. Mediating Role of Cultural Values in the Impact of Ethical Ideologies on Chinese Consumers’ Ethical Judgments. Journal of Business Ethics. 2024; 191(4): 865-884. doi: 10.1007/s10551-024-05669-0
6. García-de-Frutos N, Ortega-Egea JM, Martínez-del-Río J. Anti-consumption for Environmental Sustainability: Conceptualization, Review, and Multilevel Research Directions. Journal of Business Ethics. 2016; 148(2): 411-435. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3023-z
7. Jamal A, Yaccob A, Bartikowski B, et al. Motivations to donate: Exploring the role of religiousness in charitable donations. Journal of Business Research. 2019; 103: 319-327. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.064
8. Bengtsson M, Alfredsson E, Cohen M, et al. Transforming systems of consumption and production for achieving the sustainable development goals: moving beyond efficiency. Sustainability Science. 2018; 13(6): 1533-1547. doi: 10.1007/s11625-018-0582-1
9. Willis MM, Schor JB. Does Changing a Light Bulb Lead to Changing the World? Political Action and the Conscious Consumer. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2012; 644(1): 160-190. doi: 10.1177/0002716212454831
10. Papaoikonomou E, Ginieis M, Alarcón AA. The Problematics of Being an Ethical Consumer in the Marketplace: Unpacking the Concept of Ethical Consumer Literacy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. 2023; 43(2): 133-150. doi: 10.1177/07439156231202746
11. Oskamp S. Psychology of Promoting Environmentalism: Psychological Contributions toAchieving an Ecologically Sustainable Future for Humanity. Journal of Social Issues. 2000; 56(3): 373-390. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00173
12. Shove E. Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 2010; 42(6): 1273-1285. doi: 10.1068/a42282
13. McFarlane B L, Boxall PC. The role of social psychological and social structural variables in environmental activism: An example of the forest sector. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2003; 23(1): 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00080-4
14. Dolan AM, Galvin P. Partnerships for transformation, making connections beyond the classroom (SDG 17). In: Teaching the Sustainable Development Goals to Young Citizens (10-16 years). Taylor & Francis Group; 2024. pp. 435-462. doi: 10.4324/9781003232001-23
15. Śliwińska M. Fair Trade and Sustainable Development. Taylor & Francis Group; 2023. doi: 10.4324/9781003333845
16. Kim E. Sustainable New Product Development for Ten Thousand Villages, a Fair-Trade Social Enterprise: Empowering Women and Economic Development through Problem-Based Service Learning. Sustainability. 2023; 15(8): 6452. doi: 10.3390/su15086452
17. Freestone OM, McGoldrick PJ. Motivations of the Ethical Consumer. Journal of Business Ethics. 2007; 79(4): 445-467. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9409-1
18. Granda, RFR., Radwan, ARA, Ramirez, PLV. Fair Trade as a global movement: a systematic review of literature. Revista inclusiones 2020; 7: 399-429.
19. Wiederhold M, Martinez LF. Ethical consumer behaviour in Germany: The attitude‐behaviour gap in the green apparel industry. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2018; 42(4): 419-429. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12435
20. Elbeshbishi AN, A’ali EAA. Fair Trade and Ethical Consumerism. In: Ethical Consumerism and Comparative Studies Across Different Cultures. 2020. pp. 101-125. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-0272-3.ch007
21. Hommerová D, Krylová M. Fairtrade Town Certification in the Czech Republic. Liberec Economic Forum; 2023. doi: 10.15240/tul/009/lef-2023-14
22. Sattler, K. Creating Change with Marketing, How sustainable marketing in the food industry can lead the way. Available online: https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/857713 (accessed on 5 May 2024).
23. Raynolds LT. Fair Trade. Routledge; 2007. doi: 10.4324/9780203933534
24. Nicholls A, Opal C. Fair Trade: Market-Driven Ethical Consumption. SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781446211526
25. Olearova M, Gavurova B, Bacik R. Consumer Shopping Motive Identification: Study of Webrooming vs. Showrooming. Marketing and Management of Innovations. 2022; 2(1): 231-243. doi: 10.21272/mmi.2022.2-21
26. Srbová A, Sagapova N. Fairtrade products in retail chains: Case study in the Czech Republic. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues. 2023; 10(4): 105.
27. Bhavsar A, Diallo C, Ülkü MA. Towards sustainable development: Optimal pricing and sales strategies for retailing fair trade products. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 286: 124990. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124990
28. Gavurova B, Schonfeld J, Bilan Y, et al. Study of the Differences in the Perception of the Use of the Principles of Corporate Social Responsibility in Micro, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the V4 Countries. Journal of Competitiveness. 2022; 14(2): 23-40. doi: 10.7441/joc.2022.02.02
29. Kuzmenko O, Bilan Y, Bondarenko E, et al. Dynamic stability of the financial monitoring system: Intellectual analysis. Vasa L, ed. PLOS ONE. 2023; 18(1): e0276533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276533
30. Baake, P., Friedrichsen, J., Naegele, H. Social sustainability labels: promises and reality using the example of Fairtrade coffee (German). DIW Wochenbericht. 2018; 85(48): 1031-1037.
31. Hellwig R, Atasoy AT, Madlener R. The Impact of Social Preferences and Information on the Willingness to Pay for Fairtrade Products. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2020. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3686521
32. Gendron M, Feldman Barrett L. Reconstructing the Past: A Century of Ideas About Emotion in Psychology. Emotion Review. 2009; 1(4): 316-339. doi: 10.1177/1754073909338877
33. Wang X, Xu Z, Qin Y, et al. Innovation, the knowledge economy, and green growth: Is knowledge-intensive growth really environmentally friendly? Energy Economics. 2022; 115: 106331. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106331
34. Pan L, Xu Z, Skare M. Sustainable business model innovation literature: a bibliometrics analysis. Review of Managerial Science. 2022; 17(3): 757-785. doi: 10.1007/s11846-022-00548-2
35. Qin Y, Xu Z, Wang X, et al. Green energy adoption and its determinants: A bibliometric analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022; 153: 111780. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111780
36. Martiskova P, Waldhauserova T, Skibinski A. Corporate social responsibility activities as a way of creating value for consumers. Polish Journal of Management Studies. 2022; 26(1): 189-201. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2022.26.1.12
37. Zeng J, Škare M, Lafont J. The co-integration identification of green innovation efficiency in Yangtze River Delta region. Journal of Business Research. 2021; 134: 252-262. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.023
38. Chen Z, Ji X, Li M, et al. How corporate social responsibility auditing interacts with supply chain information transparency. Annals of Operations Research. 2022; 329(1-2): 1221-1240. doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04601-x
39. Tao R, Wu J, Zhao H. Do Corporate Customers Prefer Socially Responsible Suppliers? An Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022; 185(3): 689-712. doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05171-5
40. Sathish AS, Jain N, Choubey S, et al. Role of Customer Relationship Management in Marketing Decision Making: Predictive Analytics Approach. In: Advancements in Business for Integrating Diversity, and Sustainability. Taylor & Francis Group; 2024. pp. 68-74. doi: 10.4324/9781032708294-13
41. Ferrer-Estévez M, Chalmeta R. Sustainable customer relationship management. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 2022; 41(2): 244-262. doi: 10.1108/mip-06-2022-0266
42. Gil-Gomez H, Guerola-Navarro V, Oltra-Badenes R, et al. Customer relationship management: digital transformation and sustainable business model innovation. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2020; 33(1): 2733-2750. doi: 10.1080/1331677x.2019.1676283
43. Bennett EA. Fair trade consumers and knowledge about fair trade.In: Research Handbook on Ethical Consumption. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2023. pp. 287-310. doi: 10.4337/9781802202021.00025
44. Canova L, Bobbio A, Manganelli AM. Sustainable purchase intentions: The role of moral norm and social dominance orientation in the theory of planned behavior applied to the case of fair trade products. Sustainable Development. 2022; 31(2): 1069-1083. doi: 10.1002/sd.2441
45. Haj-Salem N. Determinants of Consumer Intention to Purchase Fair Trade Products in the Middle East: Does Gender Matter? Social Marketing Quarterly. 2024; 30(1): 19-42. doi: 10.1177/15245004241233837
46. Fernández-Ferrín P, Castro-González S, Bande B, et al. Drivers of consumer’s willingness to pay for fair trade food products: the role of positive and negative emotions. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing. 2023; 21(1): 131-154. doi: 10.1007/s12208-023-00366-6
47. Phan TA, Nguyen PNQ, Pham NA, et al. A Cross-Cultural Study on the Role of Message Framing in the Promotion of Fair-Trade Buying Behavior. SAGE Open. 2023; 13(4). doi: 10.1177/21582440231213686
48. Zollo L. Ethical identity, social image and sustainable fashion: still an impossible deal? A sociopsychological framework of ethical consumers’ attitude-behavior gaps. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2024; 41(5): 564-582. doi: 10.1108/jcm-08-2023-6213
49. Ho YH, Alam SS, Ahsan MstN, et al. Consumers’ intention toward buying ethically produced products in Bangladesh. International Journal of Emerging Markets. 2022; 18(12): 5798-5817. doi: 10.1108/ijoem-02-2021-0216
50. Zajíček, T. Determinants of ethical shopping (Czech). [Doctoral thesis]. Masaryk University; 2023.
51. Cendelínová, P. The gap between intention and behaviour in ethical food purchasing (Czech). [Doctoral thesis]. Masarykova univerzita; 2024.
52. Horská E, Janšto, E, Šedík, P. The role of iGeneration and Silver generation in shaping sustainable food markets: a cross-generational analysis in Slovakia. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2023; 7. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1240750
53. Pásztorová, J., Danišová, S. K. Corporate Social Responsibility and Application of its Principles in Chosen Transnational Corporations Based in Slovakia and its Impact on their International Marketing Management. Grant Journal 2023; 12 (2): 19-28.
54. Štarchoň P, Fedushko S, Gubíniová K, et al. Data-Centric Business and Applications. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-59131-0
55. Vankov D, Ingrid S, Vankov B, Jankovszky D. Impact of European youth strategy awareness and participation in EU activities on youth European citizenship: case studies of Bulgaria, Romania and Slovakia. Insights into Regional Development. 2024; 6(2). doi: 10.9770/ird.2024.6.2
56. Tiurbe M. At Odds with NATO: Hungary, Slovakia, and Poland. Valentin naumescu raluca moldovan anamaria florina caloianu. 2023; 126–135.
57. Gajdová D. Perspectives of agricultural cooperatives re-development after Covid 19 pandemic in Slovakia. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 2023; 29(2).
58. Sample size calculation. Available online: https://fmk.sk/vzorka (accessed on 5 May 2024).
59. Chráska M. Fundamentals of research in pedagogy (Czech). Olomouc: VUP; 2000.
60. Šálková D, Čábelková I, Hommerová D. Ethical Consumption: What Makes People Buy “Ethical” Products. Central European Business Review. 2024; 13(2): 27-52. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.346
61. Zhang J, Qi S, Lyu B. A Receiver Perspective on Knowledge Sharing Impact on Consumer–Brand Relationship in Virtual Communities. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685959
62. Zhang J, Yang L, Lyu B. Social capital and knowledge sharing among consumers in virtual communities: psychological ownership’s mediating effect. Electronic Commerce Research; 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10660-022-09625-w
63. Xu P, Cui B, Lyu B. Influence of Streamer’s Social Capital on Purchase Intention in Live Streaming E-Commerce. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748172
64. Liang, WL, Yang, WJ. Study on the influence of virtual brand community information quality on community users’ willingness to participate. Intellig Journal 2016; 35: 195-201. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1965.2016.11.035
65. Wei HL, Hai CY, Zhu SY, et al. The Impact of Consumers’ Choice Deferral Behavior on Their Intertemporal Choice Preference. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.555150
66. Zhang J, Tang B, Lyu B, et al. The impact of marketing appeals on consumer willingness to participate in virtual CSR co-creation. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 2024; 42(5): 771-789. doi: 10.1108/mip-04-2023-0177
67. Martins CC, Silva SC, Radomska J, et al. Consumer guilt proneness scale—Assessing individual differences in responses to transgressive consumption situations. Psychology & Marketing. 2023; 41(4): 838-859. doi: 10.1002/mar.21954
68. Deng X. Understanding Chinese consumers’ ethical purchasing decision-making process: A combination of qualitative and quantitative study. Geoforum. 2015; 67: 204-213. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.018
69. Rabeson L, Paraschiv C, Bertrandias L, et al. Couple Ethical Purchase Behavior and Joint Decision Making: Understanding the Interaction Process and the Dynamics of Influence. Sustainability. 2022; 14(13): 8105. doi: 10.3390/su14138105
70. Nayak S, Pereira V, Kazmi BA, et al. To Buy or Not to Buy? Exploring Ethical Consumerism in an Emerging Market—India. Journal of Business Ethics. 2024; 191(4): 811-835. doi: 10.1007/s10551-024-05670-7
71. Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Song J, et al. Research on the influence mechanism of environmental protection concept on consumption in the context of climate neutrality. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2023; 36(1). doi: 10.1080/1331677x.2023.2171456
72. Duarte P, e Silva SC, Mangei I, et al. Exploring ethical consumer behavior: a comprehensive study using the ethically minded consumer behavior-scale (EMCB) among adult consumers. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing; 2024. doi: 10.1007/s12208-024-00404-x
Copyright (c) 2024 Miriam Olšiaková, Erika Loučanová
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submit a Paper
