Challenges in evaluation standards for public investment projects (PIP) in Lao PDR: Evaluation of quality of life by a combination of OECD, ADB, and PCAP evaluation approaches

  • Bounthasin Xayalath Economic Service Department, Economic Technology and Environment Committee, National Assembly of the Laos PDR, Vientiane 01000, Lao PDR
  • Souvikane Hanpasith Department of Planning and Finance, Ministry of Public Works and Transport, Vientiane 01000, Lao PDR
  • Phothasin Saleumsack Judgement Enforcement Agencies, Attapeu Provincial Justice Department, Ministry of Justice, Attapeu 7000, Lao PDR
  • Soulivanh Chansombuth Department of Evaluation, Ministry of Planning and Investment, Vientiane 01010, Lao PDR; Economics Studies, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu 525-0058, Japan
Keywords: GFSDI; SDGs; minority people; non-monetary variables; economic evaluation
Ariticle ID: 15

Abstract

Minority people are living in society in Laos, and the Lao government is struggling to promote their lives. In rural areas, minority people are having difficulties accessing good food and safe drink intake (GFSDI). In this survey, the author 1) investigated the GFSDI of minority people by using logistic regression and to find the effectiveness and efficiency of the PIP projects via the result of GFSDI; 2) used an evaluation approach modified from OECD, ADB, and PCAP, which is called the mixed economic evaluation ‘ECEVA’, to find the effectiveness and efficiency of the PIP projects by employing ECEVA and AECEVA. The author used the primary set of data collected from the field survey by interviewing 518 villagers who were minority people and worked with the PIP projects in 11 provinces. As a result, the AECEVA showed that PIP projects were quite effective and efficient in supporting the quality of life of minority people in rural areas. Interestingly, the result of logistic regression also showed that the GFSDI of minorities could demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the PIP projects in Laos.

References

ADB. Indigenous peoples planning framework ethnic group development plan—Lao PDR: Health sector governance program, health sector governance program (RRP LAO 47137-003) Available online: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/linked-documents/47137-003-ippfab.pdf (accessed on 4 March 2023).

OECD. Rural wellbeing: Geography of opportunities: Policy Highlights. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/regional/rural-development/PH_Rural-Well-Being.pdf (accessed on 10 March 2022).

Lao PDR. Voluntary national review on the implementation of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/19385Lao_Final_VNR_19_June_2018_web.pdf (accessed on 11 March 2022).

Veterans Affairs. An introduction to finding food and drink for whole health. Available online: https://www.va.gov/WHOLEHEALTH/veteran-handouts/docs/IntroFoodDrink-508Final-9-4-2018.pdf (accessed on 14 March 2022).

MPI. Foreign Aid Implementation Report (FAIR). Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI), Department of International Cooperation (DIC); 2017.

Péneau S, Mekhmoukh A, Chapelot D, et al. Influence of environmental factors on food intake and choice of beverage during meals in teenagers: A laboratory study. British Journal of Nutrition. 2009; 102(12): 1854-1859. doi: 10.1017/s0007114509991280

Saygi YB, Shipman ZD. Factors affecting food selection and new trends in consumer food behavior. EURAS Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Volume 1 Issue 1 - February - 2021 (37-52). Available online: https://ejeas.euras-edu.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/ejeas_v01i1004.pdf (accessed on 8 March 2022).

Mental Health Foundation. Food for thought: mental health and nutrition briefing. Available online: https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-04/food-for-thought-mental-health-nutrition-briefing-march-2017.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2022).

Nalin S, Daisuke S, Prabhakar KRVS. Food safety in the Asia-Pacific region: Current status, policy perspectives, and a way forward. Institute for Strategies Environmental Global, Hayama, Japan. Strategies Environmental Global for Institute. White Paper III, pp. 238-215. Available online: https://www.iges.or.jp/en/publication_documents/pub/bookchapter/en/1842/reprint+of+chapter+10+food+safety_final.pdf (accessed on 4 January 2022).

Muhammad A, D’Souza A, Meade B. The influence of income and prices on global dietary patterns by country, age, and gender. Available online: https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/82545/err-225.pdf (accessed on 3 November 2021).

Schnettler B, Lobos G, Orellana L, et al. Analyzing Food-Related Life Satisfaction and Other Predictors of Life Satisfaction in Central Chile. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 2015; 18. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2015.32

Schnettler B, Miranda-Zapata E, Orellana L, et al. Relationships Between Work-to-Family Conflict and the Food Domain for Dual-Earner Parents With Adolescent Children. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752209

Shukri M, Jones F, Conner M. Relationship between work-family conflict and unhealthy eating: Does eating style matter? Appetite. 2018; 123: 225-232. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.12.027

Griep RH, Silva-Costa A, Chor D, et al. Gender, work-family conflict, and weight gain: four-year follow-up of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2022; 38(4). doi: 10.1590/0102-311xen066321

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The state of food security and nutrition in the world. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/cc3017en/cc3017en.pdf (accessed on 4 March 2023).

ADB. Guidelines for the evaluation of public sector operations. Independent Evaluation Department. Asian Development Bank. Available online: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/32516/guidelines-evaluation-public-sector.pdf (accessed on 2 November 2021).

OECD DAC. Better Criteria for Better Evaluation, Revised Evaluation Criteria, Definitions and Principles for Use. OECD/DAC Network on Development Evaluation. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/revised-evaluation-criteria-dec-2019.pdf (accessed on 3 December 2021).

PCAP/JICA. Manual For Public Investment Program (PIP) Program Management (Version 3.0) Ministry of Planning and Investment, Lao PDR. The Public Investment Project Management Manual. Available online: https://www.jica.go.jp/project/english/laos/0700667/materials/pdf/manual/manual_program_e1.pdf (accessed on 24 May 2022).

Lao National Socio-Economic Development Plan “NSEDP”, (1985–2021), Ministry of Planning and Investment Laos, Series 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th. Available online: https://planning.mpi.gov.la/ (accessed on 3 January 2023).

Park HA. An Introduction to Logistic Regression: From Basic Concepts to Interpretation with Particular Attention to Nursing Domain. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013; 43(2): 154. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2013.43.2.154

Published
2024-02-19
Section
Article