Determinants of enterprise green innovation performance: Examining the role of environmental orientation, green practices, and organizational commitment

  • Michael Provide Fumey School of Public Policy and Administration, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
  • Frank Agyemang Karikari School of Public Policy and Administration, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
  • Seth Acquah Boateng School of Public Policy and Administration, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
  • John Wiredu School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
  • Josephine Annan School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
  • Alexander Opoku School of Public Policy and Administration, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62617/se1363
Keywords: organizational commitment; technological capability; environmental orientations; green practices; and green innovation performance
Article ID: 1363

Abstract

This study examines the links between environmental orientation (EO), green innovation performance (GNP), and green innovation practices (GIP), with technological capabilities (TEC) acting as a moderator. It offers a framework that combines the Resource-Based View (RBV) and the Dynamic Capabilities View (DCV), wherein dynamic capabilities (technological agility) and static resources (organizational commitment, strategic focus) work together to promote sustainable innovation. PLS-SEM, or partial least squares structural equation modeling, was used to analyze data from 535 SMEs in Ghana. The findings indicate that green organizational commitment (GOC) and EO incorporating sustainability into internal operations and culture and external stakeholder collaboration significantly increase GNP. By facilitating the effective deployment of green technologies, TEC strengthens the GOC-GNP relationship. The study emphasizes the difficulties SMEs face in developing nations such as Ghana and suggests solutions according to local limitations (such as a lack of resources or regulatory gaps) and stakeholder requirements. Combining RBV and DCV into a multi-level framework that addresses firm- and industry-level factors (e.g., market demand, regulation) theoretically fills in the gaps in the sustainability literature. It provides managers with practical guidance on how to link TEC, GOC, and EO for eco-competitive results. Validated context-sensitive EO, GOC, and TEC measurement scales provide instruments for cross-regional study and enhance knowledge of green innovation in under-researched areas such as sub-Saharan Africa.

References

1. Aboelmaged M. Direct and indirect effects of eco-innovation, environmental orientation and supplier collaboration on hotel performance: An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; 184: 537-549. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.192

2. Aboelmaged M, Hashem G. Absorptive capacity and green innovation adoption in SMEs: The mediating effects of sustainable organisational capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 220: 853-863. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.150

3. Afzal CM, Khan SN, Baig FJ, et al. Impact of Green Human Resource Management on Environmental Performance: the Mediating Role of Green Innovation and Environmental Strategy in Pakistan. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences. 2023; 6(2): 227-242. doi: 10.47067/ramss.v6i2.311

4. Ahmad Zaidi MF, Othman SN. Understanding the concept of dynamic capabilities by dismantling Teece, Pisano, and Shuen’s (1997) definition. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2012; 2(8): 367-378.

5. Ahmed RR, Akbar W, Aijaz M, et al. The role of green innovation on environmental and organizational performance: Moderation of human resource practices and management commitment. Heliyon. 2023; 9(1): e12679. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12679

6. Albort-Morant G, Leal-Millán A, Cepeda-Carrión G. The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities. Journal of Business Research. 2016; 69(11): 4912-4917. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.052

7. Alraja MN, Imran R, Khashab BM, et al. Technological Innovation, Sustainable Green Practices and SMEs Sustainable Performance in Times of Crisis (COVID-19 pandemic). Information Systems Frontiers. 2022; 24(4): 1081-1105. doi: 10.1007/s10796-022-10250-z

8. Momayez A, Rasouli N, Alimohammadirokni M, et al. Green entrepreneurship orientation, green innovation and hotel performance: the moderating role of managerial environmental concern. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management. 2023; 32(8): 981-1004. doi: 10.1080/19368623.2023.2225495

9. Bai X, Lyu C. Environmental Information Disclosure and Corporate Green Innovation: The Moderating Effect of Formal and Informal Institutions. Sustainability. 2023; 15(7): 6169. doi: 10.3390/su15076169

10. Banerjee SB. Corporate environmentalism: the construct and its measurement. Journal of Business Research. 2002; 55(3): 177-191. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00135-1

11. Barney J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. 1991; 17(1): 99-120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108

12. Barreto I. Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future. Journal of Management. 2009; 36(1): 256-280. doi: 10.1177/0149206309350776

13. Becker B. Green Innovation Strategies, Innovation Success, and Firm Performance—Evidence from a Panel of Spanish Firms. Sustainability. 2023; 15(2): 1656. doi: 10.3390/su15021656

14. Cepeda G, Vera D. Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Business Research. 2007; 60(5): 426-437. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.013

15. Chan RYK. Corporate environmentalism pursuit by foreign firms competing in China. Journal of World Business. 2010; 45(1): 80-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2009.04.010

16. Chang CH. The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation. Journal of Business Ethics. 2011; 104(3): 361-370. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0914-x

17. Chen L, Yuan M, Lin H, et al. Organizational improvisation and corporate green innovation: A dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2023; 32(8): 5686-5701. doi: 10.1002/bse.3443

18. Chen M, Liu H, Wei S, et al. Top managers’ managerial ties, supply chain integration, and firm performance in China: A social capital perspective. Industrial Marketing Management. 2018; 74: 205-214. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.04.013

19. Chen S, Wang J, Zhang Z. Enterprise Green Innovation Mechanism under the “Target-Resource-Network” System—An Empirical Study Based on Data of Listed Companies in China’s Construction Industry. Sustainability. 2023; 15(4): 3687. doi: 10.3390/su15043687

20. Chen Y, Lin S, Lin C, et al. Improving green product development performance from green vision and organizational culture perspectives. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2019; 27(1): 222-231. doi: 10.1002/csr.1794

21. Cheng Z, Wu B, Deng X, et al. Corrigendum: The impact of employees’ pro-environmental behaviors on corporate green innovation performance: The mediating effect of green organizational identity. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130314

22. Dragomir VD. Corporate Environmental Strategy. Springer International Publishing; 2020.

23. Fahad S, Alnori F, Su F, et al. Adoption of green innovation practices in SMEs sector: evidence from an emerging economy. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2022; 35(1): 5486-5501. doi: 10.1080/1331677x.2022.2029713

24. Fatoki O. Environmental Orientation and Green Competitive Advantage of Hospitality Firms in South Africa: Mediating Effect of Green Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2021; 7(4): 223. doi: 10.3390/joitmc7040223

25. Fraj-Andrés E, Martinez-Salinas E, Matute-Vallejo J. A Multidimensional Approach to the Influence of Environmental Marketing and Orientation on the Firm’s Organizational Performance. Journal of Business Ethics. 2008; 88(2): 263-286. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9962-2

26. Fumey MP, Wiredu J, Essuman AN. Evaluating taxation’s dual impact on business and social development: A case study of the Cape Coast metropolis in Ghana. Financial Statistical Journal. 2024; 7(1). doi: 10.24294/fsj.v6i2.3833

27. Grindley PC, Teece DJ. Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics. California Management Review. 1997; 39(2): 8-41. doi: 10.2307/41165885

28. Gull M, Rashid M, Hassan S, et al. Role of top management green commitment, adaptability culture and green product innovation in boosting organizational green performance in Pakistan. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel. 2023; 28(4): 1066-1090. doi: 10.1108/rjta-12-2022-0159

29. Guo Y, Wang L, Yang Q. Do corporate environmental ethics influence firms’ green practice? The mediating role of green innovation and the moderating role of personal ties. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020; 266: 122054. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122054

30. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 2011; 19(2): 139-152. doi: 10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202

31. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. Editorial - Partial Least Squares: The Better Approach to Structural Equation Modeling?. Long Range Planning. 2012; 45(5-6): 312-319.

32. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. Editorial - Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Planning. 2013; 46(1-2): 1-12.

33. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Pieper TM, et al. The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Past Practices and Recommendations for Future Applications. Long Range Planning. 2012; 45(5-6): 320-340. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008

34. Hamann R, Smith J, Tashman P, et al. Why Do SMEs Go Green? An Analysis of Wine Firms in South Africa. Business & Society. 2016; 56(1): 23-56. doi: 10.1177/0007650315575106

35. Hameed Z, Naeem RM, Misra P, et al. Ethical leadership and environmental performance: The role of green IT capital, green technology innovation, and technological orientation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2023; 194: 122739. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122739

36. Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Camp SM, et al. Strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal. 2001; 22(6-7): 479-491. doi: 10.1002/smj.196

37. Iqbal S, Akhtar S, Anwar F, et al. Linking green innovation performance and green innovative human resource practices in SMEs; a moderation and mediation analysis using PLS-SEM. Current Psychology. 2021; 42(13): 11250-11267. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02403-1

38. Khan MAS, Du J, Malik HA, et al. Green innovation practices and consumer resistance to green innovation products: Moderating role of environmental knowledge and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2022; 7(4): 100280. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100280

39. Khan MT, Idrees MD, Rauf M, et al. Green Supply Chain Management Practices’ Impact on Operational Performance with the Mediation of Technological Innovation. Sustainability. 2022; 14(6): 3362. doi: 10.3390/su14063362

40. Lee H, Peirsman Y, Chang A, et al. Stanford’s Multi-Pass Sieve Coreference Resolution System at the CoNLL-2011 Shared Task. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task; 23-24 June 2011; Portland, Oregon.

41. Lestari ER, Sunyoto NMS. Fostering green innovation in achieving sustainable performance. Natural Resources Forum. 2023; 47(3): 413-434. doi: 10.1111/1477-8947.12293

42. Li B, Lei Y, Hu M, et al. The Impact of Policy Orientation on Green Innovative Performance: The Role of Green Innovative Capacity and Absorptive Capacity. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2022; 10. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.842133

43. Li C, Zhang Z, De Sisto M, et al. Environmental Practices, Digitalization, and Green Innovation in Multinational Firms. Journal of Global Information Management. 2023; 31(1): 1-16. doi: 10.4018/jgim.323183

44. Li D, Zheng M, Cao C, et al. The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: Evidence from China top 100. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017; 141: 41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.123

45. Li H. Green Innovation, Green Dynamic Capability, and Enterprise Performance: Evidence from Heavy Polluting Manufacturing Enterprises in China. Zhang W, ed. Complexity. 2022; 2022(1). doi: 10.1155/2022/7755964

46. Li X, Yang J, Liu H, et al. Entrepreneurial orientation and green management in an emerging economy: The moderating effects of social legitimacy and ownership type. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 316: 128293. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128293

47. Li X, Zeng W, Xu M. The Moderating Role of IT Capability on Green Innovation and Ambidexterity: Towards a Corporate Sustainable Development. Sustainability. 2022; 14(24): 16767. doi: 10.3390/su142416767

48. Liao Y, Deschamps F, Loures E de FR, et al. Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research. 2017; 55(12): 3609-3629. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576

49. Lin H, Zeng SX, Ma HY, et al. Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2014; 64: 63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046

50. Luo X, Abbas A, Wattoo MU, et al. Organizational Behavior in Green Supply Chain Integration: Nexus Between Information Technology Capability, Green Innovation, and Organizational Performance. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874639

51. Mady K, Abdul Halim MAS, Omar K, et al. Institutional pressure and eco-innovation: The mediating role of green absorptive capacity and strategically environmental orientation among manufacturing SMEs in Egypt. Cogent Business & Management. 2022; 9(1). doi: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2064259

52. Menguc B, Ozanne LK. Challenges of the “green imperative”: a natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation–business performance relationship. Journal of Business Research. 2005; 58(4): 430-438. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.09.002

53. Mitchell S, Dimache A, O’Dowd P. Environmental challenges for European manufacturing SMEs. In: Proceedings of the International Manufacturing Conference IMC27; 2010.

54. Mondéjar-Jiménez J, Segarra-Oña M, Peiró-Signes Á, et al. Segmentation of the Spanish automotive industry with respect to the environmental orientation of firms: towards an ad-hoc vertical policy to promote eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015; 86: 238-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.034

55. Mose N, Fumey M, Kipchirchir E. Drivers of Carbon Emissions in Kenya: The Perspective of Technology. Asian Journal of Geographical Research. 2024; 7(2): 1-10. doi: 10.9734/ajgr/2024/v7i2226

56. Mukhtar B, Shad MK, Woon LF. Predicting the Effect of Environment, Social and Governance Practices on Green Innovation: An Artificial Neural Network Approach. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems and Intelligent Applications; 2022.

57. Ogiemwonyi O, Alam MN, Hago IE, et al. Green innovation behaviour: Impact of industry 4.0 and open innovation. Heliyon. 2023; 9(6): e16524. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16524

58. Pacheco DA de J, ten Caten CS, Jung CF, et al. Eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs: Systematic review and research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017; 142: 2277-2287. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.049

59. Pandithasekara D. Green Innovation Practices and Its Impact on Organizational Performance: Evidence from Apparel Industry of Sri Lanka. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews; 2022.

60. Peng YS, Lin SS. Local Responsiveness Pressure, Subsidiary Resources, Green Management Adoption and Subsidiary’s Performance: Evidence from Taiwanese Manufactures. Journal of Business Ethics. 2007; 79(1-2): 199-212. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9382-8

61. Rehan M, Hussain Y, Khan J, et al. Top management green commitment, green process innovation and green intellectual capital as enablers of hotel environmental performance: The mediating role of green human resource management. Research square; 2023.

62. Rehman SU, Elrehail H, Poulin M, et al. Green managerial practices and green performance: A serial mediation model. International Journal of Innovation Studies. 2023; 7(3): 196-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijis.2022.12.004

63. Xiao R, Ding J, Qian L. Review on the Green Innovation Performance Evaluation. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics. 2017; 35(02): 100.

64. Riani AL, Subanti S, Islamiyah. Improving green innovation performance by smes in indonesia. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. 2022; 57(6): 167-181. doi: 10.35741/issn.0258-2724.57.6.15

65. Richter NF, Hauff S, Ringle CM, et al. The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling and Complementary Methods in International Management Research. Management International Review. 2022; 62(4): 449-470. doi: 10.1007/s11575-022-00475-0

66. Ruan R, Chen W, Zhu Z. Linking Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility with Green Innovation Performance: The Mediating Role of Shared Vision Capability and the Moderating Role of Resource Slack. Sustainability. 2022; 14(24): 16943. doi: 10.3390/su142416943

67. Boateng SA, Karikari FA, Fumey MP, et al. Understanding Global Commodity Price Shocks on Exchange Rates and Inflation in Emerging Economies: ARDL Perspective. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade. 2024; 30(5): 33-47. doi: 10.9734/jemt/2024/v30i51208

68. Shahriari M, Tajmir Riahi M, Azizan O, et al. The effect of green organizational culture on organizational commitment: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. 2022; 33(2): 180-197. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2022.2029789

69. Shuwaikh F, Benkraiem R, Dubocage E. Investment in Green Innovation: How does It Contribute to Environmental and Financial Performance? Journal of Innovation Economics & Management. 2023; N° 41(2): 107-149. doi: 10.3917/jie.pr1.0137

70. Singh D, Pandey A. Green HRM: An organizational commitment. JIMS8M: The Journal of Indian Management & Strategy. 2020; 25(1): 14. doi: 10.5958/0973-9343.2020.00002.2

71. Soewarno N, Tjahjadi B, Fithrianti F. Green innovation strategy and green innovation. Management Decision. 2019; 57(11): 3061-3078. doi: 10.1108/md-05-2018-0563

72. Song W, Yu H. Green Innovation Strategy and Green Innovation: The Roles of Green Creativity and Green Organizational Identity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2017; 25(2): 135-150. doi: 10.1002/csr.1445

73. Su J, He J. Does Giving Lead to Getting? Evidence from Chinese Private Enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics. 2009; 93(1): 73-90. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0183-0

74. Tahir R, Athar MR, Faisal F, et al. Green Organizational Culture: A Review of Literature and Future Research Agenda. Annals of Contemporary Developments in Management & HR. 2019; 1(1): 23-38. doi: 10.33166/acdmhr.2019.01.004

75. Tseng ML, Wang R, Chiu ASF, et al. Improving performance of green innovation practices under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2013; 40: 71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.009

76. Vargas-Hernández JG, Maillard CAR, Vargas-González OC. Green Organizational Culture, Green Innovation, and Green Performance for Achieving Environmental Sustainability. In: Handbook of Research on Promoting an Inclusive Organizational Culture for Entrepreneurial Sustainability. IGI Global; 2022.

77. Vargas-Hernández JG, Vargas-González OC. Organizational Innovation Approach to Green Technological Innovation. In: Intellectual Capital as a Precursor to Sustainable Corporate Social Responsibility. IGI Global; 2023.

78. Vargas-Hernandez JG, Higuera-Cota MF, Vargas-González OC. Organizational Socio-Ecology and Green Technological Innovation. In: Intersecting Health, Livability, and Human Behavior in Urban Environments. IGI Global; 2023.

79. Wang H, Khan MAS, Anwar F, et al. Green Innovation Practices and Its Impacts on Environmental and Organizational Performance. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.553625

80. Wang H, Qian C. Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Financial Performance: The Roles of Stakeholder Response and Political Access. Academy of Management Journal. 2011; 54(6): 1159-1181. doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.0548

81. Wang N, Zhang J, Zhang X, et al. How to Improve Green Innovation Performance: A Conditional Process Analysis. Sustainability. 2022; 14(5): 2938. doi: 10.3390/su14052938

82. Wang S, Abbas J, Sial MS, et al. Achieving green innovation and sustainable development goals through green knowledge management: Moderating role of organizational green culture. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2022; 7(4): 100272. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100272

83. Wang Y, Ozturk I. Role of green innovation, green internal, and external supply chain management practices: a gateway to environmental sustainability. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2023; 36(3). doi: 10.1080/1331677x.2023.2192769

84. Weaver DC, Workman C, Stormo GD. Modeling regulatory networks with weight matrices. World Scientific; 1998.

85. Wei F, Abbas J, Alarifi G, et al. Role of green intellectual capital and top management commitment in organizational environmental performance and reputation: Moderating role of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023; 405: 136847. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136847

86. Wiredu J, Yang Q, Sampene AK, et al. Key Barriers for Bioenergy Projects Implementation: A fresh insight from Ghana. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research. 2022; 05(04): 237-256. doi: 10.37502/ijsmr.2022.5418

87. Wiredu J, Yang Q, Saljoughipour S, et al. Stimulating environmental performance through green human resource practice: Does green transformational leadership matter? Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 2023; 7(1): 2127. doi: 10.24294/jipd.v7i1.2127

88. Wiredu J, Yang Q, Lu T, et al. Delving into environmental pollution mitigation: does green finance, economic development, renewable energy resource, life expectancy, and urbanization matter? In: Environment, Development and Sustainability. Open University Press; 2025.

89. Wiredu J, Yang Q, Sampene AK, et al. Economic Advancement and Renewable Energy Transition: Exploring the Integral Role of Trade Openness, Digital Transition, and Urbanization Among the NAFTA Economies. Springer Nature; 2024.

90. Xing X, Wang J, Tou L. The Relationship between Green Organization Identity and Corporate Environmental Performance: The Mediating Role of Sustainability Exploration and Exploitation Innovation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(6): 921. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060921

91. Xu N, Fan X, Hu R. Adoption of Green Industrial Internet of Things to Improve Organizational Performance: The Role of Institutional Isomorphism and Green Innovation Practices. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917533

92. Xu X, Cheng M, Zhang K. Driving mechanism of low-carbon innovation: based on the perspective of green entrepreneurship orientation and innovation flexibility. Advances in Economics and Management Research. 2023; 3(1): 106. doi: 10.56028/aemr.3.1.106

93. Yang H, Zhu X. Research on Green Innovation Performance of Manufacturing Industry and Its Improvement Path in China. Sustainability. 2022; 14(13): 8000. doi: 10.3390/su14138000

94. Yin J, Li C. Data governance and green technological innovation performance: A curvilinear relationship. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022; 379: 134441. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134441

95. Zahra SA, Sapienza HJ, Davidsson P. Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda*. Journal of Management Studies. 2006; 43(4): 917-955. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x

96. Zehir C, Ozgul B. Environmental orientation and firm performance. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478). 2020; 9(5): 13-25. doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i5.883

97. Zhang JA, Walton S. Eco‐innovation and business performance: the moderating effects of environmental orientation and resource commitment in green‐oriented SMEs. R&D Management. 2016; 47(5). doi: 10.1111/radm.12241

98. Zhang X, Song Y, Zhang M. Exploring the relationship of green investment and green innovation: Evidence from Chinese corporate performance. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023; 412: 137444. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137444

Published
2025-03-06
How to Cite
Fumey, M. P., Karikari, F. A., Boateng, S. A., Wiredu, J., Annan, J., & Opoku, A. (2025). Determinants of enterprise green innovation performance: Examining the role of environmental orientation, green practices, and organizational commitment. Sustainable Economies, 3(1), 1363. https://doi.org/10.62617/se1363
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Section
Article

Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.